DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Review of WFME 2020 Compared to WFME 2015 and KAS2021

WFME 2020 개정 3판의 기준과 WFME 2015, KAS 2021 기준 비교

  • Park, Haemo (Dept. of Preventive Korean Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Sang-Ji University) ;
  • Sun, Seung Ho (Dept. of Korean Internal Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Sang-Ji University & Institute of Korean Medicine Education and Evaluation)
  • 박해모 (상지대학교 한의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 선승호 (상지대학교 한의과대학 한방내과학교실 및 한국한의학교육평가원)
  • Received : 2021.04.26
  • Accepted : 2021.04.29
  • Published : 2021.04.30

Abstract

Objective : We reviewed WFME2020 and compare it with WFME 2015 and KAS2021 to find similarities and differences. It will be used as basic data for future evaluation and certification criteria development. Method : WFME 2020 and WFME 2015 were translated and summarized around the core content. The structure of each standard was analyzed and organized, and then, based on the WFME 2020 standard items corresponding to each item were arranged in the items of WFME 2015 and KAS2021. Two authors translated and compared them separately, and if the content was different or the intention of the translation was different, the final revision was made after sufficient discussion. Results: The WFME 2020 standard consists of 8 major areas and 21 sub-areas. The WFME 2020 has a structural change compared to the 9 major and 35 sub-areas of WFME 2015. The importance of the mission is being emphasized, the curriculum and student selection have been changed so that they can be adjusted according to the local situation, and the areas of evaluation and program evaluation have been strengthened. Conclusion : Overall, the increased autonomy of schools and institutions seems positive from the standpoint of Korean Medicine education evaluation certification, but additional research and education are needed for the strengthened areas. In order to develop the WFME 2020 standard to the certification criteria in the future, in-depth discussion and consensus will be required in consideration of the characteristics of Korean Medicine.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2019년도 상지대학교 교내연구비 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. World Federation for Medical Education. New edition of WFME Standards for Basic Medical Education. WFME. [cited in 2021.04.05. Available from: https://wfme.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WFME-BME-Standards-2020-1.pdf]
  2. Lee J, Kim B. Study of Korean medicine's Education In Accordance With Curriculum Part of World Federation Medical Education Global Standards. Journal of Korean Medicine. 2018;39(3):28-40. https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.18022
  3. Ahn DS. Current Status and Direction of Improvements in Accreditation of Medical Schools, Research Institute for Healthcare Policy Korean Medical Association 2015;13(2):38-44.
  4. World Federation for Medical Education. The updated second edition of the WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement: Basic Medical Education [http://wfme.org/standards/bme]
  5. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Korean Law Information Center. [https://law.go.kr]
  6. Institute of Korean Medicine Education & Evaluation. Korean Medicine Education Accreditation Standards 2021: KAS2021. Korea. [cited 2021.04.05.: Available from: http://ikmee.or.kr/board5/bbs/board.php?bo_table=02_06&wr_id=7]
  7. The history of Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation [http://www.kimee.or.kr/kimee/history/]
  8. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation: Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019 (ASK2019). 2018. [http://kimee.or.kr/medical-education/criteria/]
  9. Sun SH. A Comparative study among 2nd cycle of Evaluation and Accreditation system on Korean Medicine Education, Global Standards of WFME for Basic Medical Education and WHO guidelines for quality assurance of Traditional Medicine Education in the Western Pacific Region. Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine. 2019;23(3):41-57
  10. Seo DJ. Comparison between Accreditation Board for Medical Education in Korea and Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea. Korean Medical Education Review. 2000 ; 2(1) : 57-69.
  11. Lee YM, Yoon TY, Kim SY, Roh HR, Park SY, Park JY et al. Development of Outcome Measurement Toolkits in Basic Medical Education Program Evaluation and Accreditation. Korean Medical Association Report. 2018:1-185.
  12. Shin S, Park Jongbae J: A Study on Implications for Korean Medicine Education by Comparing International Competence Frameworks in Medical Education. Journal of physiology & pathology in Korean Medicine. 2017;31(1):36-45. https://doi.org/10.15188/kjopp.2017.02.31.1.36