Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Online Learners' Motivational Regulation Profiles Affecting Cognitive Learning and Learning Engagement

온라인 학습자의 동기조절전략 사용 군집유형이 인지학습과 학습몰입에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2020.12.28
  • Accepted : 2021.01.19
  • Published : 2021.02.26
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate online learners' clustering profiles according to the use of eight motivational regulation strategies, developed by Schwinger, Steinmayr, and Spinath(2009) and differences in the use of cognitive learning strategies and learning engagement between their clusters. Data were collected from 139 students enrolled in two 4-year public and private universities in a metropolitan city. Through cluster analysis for motivational regulation profiles, three clusters(cluster 1: high profile motivational regulation group, cluster 2: medium profile motivational regulation group, cluster 3: low profile motivational regulation group) were presented. In addition, the results of multivariate analysis of variance(MANOVA) indicated that there were statistically significant differences in the use of cognitive learning strategies(rehearsal, elaboration, organization, and critical thinking) and three types of learning engagement(behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement). The post hoc tests showed that the high profile motivational regulation group most actively used cognitive learning strategies and was most engaged in learning than any other motivational regulation groups. This study provides crucial insight in designing appropriate instruction and learning support for enhancing learners' motivational regulation.

본 연구는 Schwinger, Steinmayr, 그리고 Spinath(2009)가 제시한 8요인 동기조절전략의 사용 정도에 따라 대학생 온라인 학습자들이 어떠한 군집유형을 드러내는지 살펴보고, 각 군집유형 간에 인지학습과 학습몰입에서 어떠한 차이가 나는지 검토하고자 한다. 광역시 소재 4년제 C대학교와 G대학교에 재학 중인 대학생 139명을 대상으로 동기조절전략의 사용 유형 탐색을 위해 군집분석을 실시한 결과, 군집1: '고빈도 동기조절집단', 군집2: '중빈도 동기조절집단', 군집3: '저빈도 동기조절집단'으로 도출되었다. 이러한 군집유형이 인지학습전략(시연, 정교화, 조직화, 비판적 사고)과 학습몰입(행동적 몰입, 정서적 몰입, 인지적 몰입)에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위해 다변량 분산분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 3가지 군집유형에 따른 인지학습전략 사용과 학습몰입에 있어서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 고빈도 동기조절집단은 다른 두 집단에 비해 가장 적극적으로 인지학습전략을 사용하며, 학습몰입의 정도 또한 가장 높게 나타났다. 이 연구를 통해 학습자의 학습동기를 유발, 촉진, 조절하기 위한 교수설계와 동기지원 방안에 대한 시사점을 제언하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York, NY: Springer.
  2. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
  3. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
  4. Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224
  5. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1
  6. Jo, I.-H., & Kim, Y.-H. (2014). An analysis of the structural relationships among undergraduate students' learning motivations, cognitive strategies, and academic achievements. Journal of educational studies, 45(2), 77-98.
  7. Park, S., & Yun, H. (2017). Relationships between motivational strategies and cognitive learning in distance education courses. Distance Education, 38(3), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369007
  8. Lee, J., Kim, N. R., & Jung, H. (2017). Development and validation study of the Korean learning motivational regulation strategies inventory. Korean Journal of Counseling, 18(5), 287-309.
  9. Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 621-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.006
  10. Kang, M. S., & Lim, K. (2013). Structural analyses on the effects of self-regulated learning and learning motivation on learner-instructor interactions and academic performance in college learning environments with e-learning contents. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(11), 1014-1023. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.11.1014
  11. Kim, E. Y. (2008). Women's university students' motivational regulation strategies according to the academic achievements. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(1), 111-127.
  12. Lee, J. (2014). Cluster types based on the use of learning motivational regulation strategies among high school students. The Korean Journal of Counseling, 15(5), 2001-2018. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.15.5.201410.2001
  13. Kim, M. (2011). Web-based e-learning system supporting an effective self-directed learning environment. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(9), 524-535. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.9.524
  14. Park, J., & Lee, Y. (2018). The effect of self-regulated learning strategy and presence on academic achievement in web-based e-learning. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(3), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.03.215
  15. Kim, D., & Yun, H. (2020). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on cognitive learning and academic achievement between online and face-to-face learners in higher education. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 28(5), 347-373.
  16. Park, S., & Yun, H. (2018). The influence of motivational regulation strategies on online students' behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1412738
  17. Schwinger, M., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2012). Effects of motivational regulation on effort and achievement: A mediation model. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.07.005
  18. Bak, B. G., Jung, K. S., Kim, S. M., & Lee, J. U. (2005). Develpment and validation of a complex scale of self-regulated learning: Focused on integrating the subscale of motivation regulation. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(2), 455-476.
  19. Lee, J. (2013). A study for preliminary validation of the learning motivational regulation strategies inventory. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 25(4), 795-812.
  20. Kim, E. Y., & Park, S. H. (2006). The relationship between students' motivational regulation as a component of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 101-130.
  21. Kim, H. J., & Kim, H. J. J. (2011). The path relationships among perception of autonomy, academic emotions, and the use of cognitive self-regulated learning strategies within a course in Korean undergraduates. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(3), 693-716.
  22. Yun, H., & Park, S. (2020). Building a structural model of motivational regulation and learning engagement for undergraduate and graduate students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(2), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1510910
  23. Zhang, S., & Liu, Q. (2019). Investigating the relationships among teachers' motivational beliefs, motivational regulation, and their learning engagement in online professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 134, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.013
  24. Sim, H. (2017). The effect of mentor feedback on self-regulated learning, self-directed learning, and academic achievement in an online learning environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 25(1), 169-189.
  25. Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome - Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006
  26. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Predictive validity and reliability of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  27. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  28. Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
  29. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). London, UK: Pearson.
  30. Park, S., & Lim, J. (2020). Training motivational regulation skills through virtual avatars in online learning. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, A. Tawfik, A. Grincewicz & M. Schmidt (Eds.), A new focus for learning: Educational technology beyond content. New York, NY: Springer.
  31. Yun, H., Park, S., Kim, D., Jung, E., & Yoon, M. (2020). The influence of academic level and course delivery mode on the use of motivational regulation strategies and learning engagement. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5879
  32. Daumiller, M., & Dresel, M. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning with digital media using motivational regulation and metacognitive prompts. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(1), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1448744