DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of the suitability of new developed epoxy based-phantom for child's tissue equivalency in paediatric radiology

  • Yucel, Haluk (Ankara University, Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Besevler 10.Yil Campus) ;
  • Safi, Aziz (Ankara University, Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Besevler 10.Yil Campus)
  • Received : 2020.04.11
  • Accepted : 2021.07.03
  • Published : 2021.12.25

Abstract

In this study, tissue equivalency (TE) of a newly developed epoxy-based phantom to 3-5 years child's tissue was investigated in paediatric energy range. Epoxy-based TE-phantoms were produced at different glandular/adipose (G/A) ratios of 17/83%, 31/69%, 36/64% and 10/90%. A procedure was developed in which specific amounts of boron, calcium, magnesium, sulphur compounds are mixed with epoxy resin, together with other minor substitutes. In paediatric energy range of 40-60 kVp half-value layer (HVL) values were measured and then Hounsfield Units (HU) were determined from Computed Tomography(CT) scans taken in the X-ray energy range of 80-120kVp. It is found that radiation absorption properties of these phantoms in terms of the measured HVL values related to linear attenuation coefficients (µ) are very well mimicking a 3 years child's soft tissue in case a ratio of 10/90%G/A. Additionally, the HU values of phantoms were determined from the CT scans. The HU = 47.8 ± 4.8 value was found for the epoxy-based phantom produced at a ratio of 10/90%G/A. The obtained HVL and HU values also support the suitability of the new epoxy based-phantom produced at a ratio of 10/90%G/A for a satisfactory mimicking a 3 years child's soft tissue by 5%. Thus they can have a potential use to perform the quality controls of medical X-ray systems and dose optimization studies.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Authors are gratefully thankful to Prof. Dr. Durmus Etiz who gave a permission to use Siemens CT system in Eskisehir Osmangazi University Oncology Department. Authors are also thankful to Mr. Ibrahim Demirel, Mr. R. Bora Nartturk, Ms. Gizem Gedik and Ms. Solen Yuksel who helped to perform some experimental works conducted at Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Ankara University.

References

  1. A.M. Ali, P. Hogg, S. Johansen, A. England, Construction and validation of a low cost paediatric pelvis phantom, Eur. J. Radiol. 108 (2018) 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.015
  2. A.F.F. Alves, J.R.A. Miranda, F.A.B. Neto, S.B. Duarte, D.R. Pina, Construction of pediatric homogeneous phantoms for optimization of chest and skull radiographs, Eur. J. Radiol. 84 (8) (2015) 1579-1585, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.015.
  3. Amptek Inc., XR-100CdTe X-ray ve gamma ray detector. http://amptek.com/products/xr-100cdte-x-ray-and-gamma-ray-detector/. Access Date: 28.04.2019.
  4. J.L. Rodriguez-Ibarra, P.L. Hernandez-Adame, H.R. Vega-Carrillo, T. Rivera, X-ray spectra and doses, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 117 (2016) 32-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.04.001.
  5. S. Cubukcu, H. Yucel, Characterization of paraffin based breast tissue equivalent phantom using a CdTe detector pulse height analysis, APESM (Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med.) 39 (4) (2016) 877-884, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0487-1.
  6. M. Freed, J.A. Zwart, J.T. Loud, R.H. El Khouli, K.J. Myers, M.H. Greene, J.H. Duyn, A. Badano, An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI, Med. Phys. 38 (2) (2011) 743-753. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3533899
  7. G.N. Hounsfield, Computed medical imaging, Science 210 (1980) 22-28, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6997993.
  8. ICRU 44, International comission on radiation units and measurements. ICRU report 44: tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement, J. Int. Comm. Radiat. Units Meas. os-23 (1) (1989).
  9. EN IEC 61267, Standard for Medical Diagnostic X-Ray Equipment -Radiation Conditions for Use in the Determination of Characteristics, International Electrotechnical Commission(IEC), Switzerland, 2006, 3, rue de Varembe, PO Box 131, CH-1211 Geneva 20.
  10. ISO 4037-1, Standard for Radiological Protection-X and Gamma Reference Radiation for Calibrating Dosemeters and Doserate Meters and for Determining Their Response as a Function of Photon Energy- Part 1: Radiation Characteristics and Production Methods, 2019. CP401 Ch de Blandonnet 8, CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland.
  11. N. Kasraie, A. Robinson, S. Chan, Construction of an anthropomorphic phantom for use in evaluating pediatric airway digital tomosynthesis protocols, Radiol. Res. Pract. 3835810 (2018) 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3835810.
  12. B. Martinez-Tellez, G. Sanchez-Delgado, M.R. Boon, P.C.N. Rensen, J.M. Llamas-Elvira, Distribution of Brown adipose tissue radiodensity in young adults: implications for cold [18F]FDG-PET/CT analyses, Mol. Imag. Biol. 22 (2) (2020) 425-433, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01381-y.
  13. NIST XCOM, X-ray mass attenuation coefficients. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/ComTab/air.html. Acces date: 05.05.2019.
  14. P.D. Price, A.P. Gibson, L.T. Tan, G.J. Royle, An elastically compressible phantom material with mechanical and x-ray attenuation properties equivalent to breast tissue, Phys. Med. Biol. 55 (4) (2010) 1177-1188. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/4/018
  15. PTW, Freiburg, PTW farmer ionization chambers. https://www.ptw.de/farmer_chambers0.html. Acces Date: 05.05.2019.
  16. T. Shimonobo, Y. Funama, D. Utsunomiya, T. Nakaura, S. Oda, M. Kiguchi, T. Masuda, D. Sakabe, Y. Yamashita, K. Awai, Low-tube-voltage selection for non-contrast-enhanced CT: comparison of the radiation dose in pediatric and adult phantoms, Phys. Med. 32 (2016) 197-201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.12.005.
  17. B.W. Ullrich, P. Schenk, U.J. Spiegl, T. Mendel, G.O. Hofmann, Hounsfield units as predictor for cage subsidence and loss of reduction: following posterior-anterior stabilization in thoracolumbar spine fractures, Eur. Spine J. 27 (12) (2018) 3034-3042, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5792-9.
  18. D.R. White, R.J. Martin, R. Darlison, Epoxy resin based tissue substitutes, Br. J. Radiol. 50 (599) (1977) 814-821, https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-50-599-814.
  19. H. Yucel, E. Gulluoglu, S. Cubukcu, Y.A. uncu, Measurement of the attenuation properties of the protective materials used as a thyroid guard and apron for personnel protection against diagnostic medical X-rays, J. Phys. Sci. 27 (1) (2016) 111-128.
  20. H. Yucel, Development of a Tissue Equivalent Phantom Used for Quality Control Tests of Mammography Systems and its Characterization by Using X-Ray Spectroscopy, 2017 (in Turkish), Final Project Report, 1003TuB_ITAK, Project No:115S108.
  21. A.K. Jones, D.E. Hintenlang, W.E. Bolch, Tissue-equivelant materials for construction of tomographic dosimetry phantoms in pediatric radiology, Med. Phys. 30 (8) (2003) 2072-2081. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1592641