Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Secondary nipple reconstruction using two surgical techniques

  • Chung, Jae-Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Da-Som (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Yeo, Hyun-Dong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Seung-Pil (Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Park, Seung-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Eul-Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital)
  • Received : 2021.02.07
  • Accepted : 2021.07.07
  • Published : 2021.11.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Although the initial projection after primary nipple reconstruction is excellent, nipple projection gradually flattens in most cases due to multiple causes. Although various methods have been reported to rebuild the nipple after nipple flattening, the most effective method of secondary nipple reconstruction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to review our institution's experiences with secondary nipple reconstruction. Methods We conducted a retrospective review from March 2012 to January 2019. We performed secondary nipple reconstruction if the primary reconstructed nipple height differed by more than 6 mm from the normal nipple height. We chose the method of nipple revision according to the degree of tissue scarring and the remaining nipple projection. Results We performed secondary nipple reconstruction on a total of 27 nipples, using purse-string sutures for 19 nipples and star flaps in eight nipples. The median follow-up period was 8 months (range, 6-19 months) after the final nipple reconstruction. Among the 19 nipples reconstructed using purse-string sutures, 10 (53%) demonstrated acceptable projection of more than 5 mm. Among the eight nipples reconstructed using star flaps, six (75%) showed acceptable projection of more than 5 mm. Most of the patients (73%) were satisfied (scores of 4 or 5) with the nipple reconstruction overall. Conclusions Few studies have presented favorable outcomes of secondary nipple reconstruction. When the star flap and purse-string suture methods were used depending on the remaining nipple height and scarring, appropriate projection could be achieved.

Keywords

References

  1. Goh SC, Martin NA, Pandya AN, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and tattooing. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:360-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.05.010
  2. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, et al. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:699-704. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198711000-00007
  3. Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C, et al. The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:389-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318246e572
  4. Farhadi J, Maksvytyte GK, Schaefer DJ, et al. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex: an update. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.08.006
  5. Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick J 3rd. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:361-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200108000-00013
  6. Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, et al. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:780-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200209010-00010
  7. Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA, et al. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1321-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199910000-00012
  8. Chia HL, Wong M, Tan BK. Nipple reconstruction with rolled dermal graft support. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:158-62. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.158
  9. Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, et al. Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1602-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199705010-00020
  10. Kim JH, Ahn HC. A revision restoring projection after nipple reconstruction by burying four triangular dermal flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2016;43:339-43. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.339
  11. Nahabedian MY. Secondary nipple reconstruction using local flaps and AlloDerm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:2056-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000164490.99581.F9
  12. Bernard RW, Beran SJ. Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:964-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000076245.12249.BE
  13. Tanabe HY, Tai Y, Kiyokawa K, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:431-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199708000-00025
  14. Park IY, Kim MR, Jo HH, et al. Association of the nippleareola complexes with age, parity, and breastfeeding in Korean premenopausal women. J Hum Lact 2014;30:474-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334414549049
  15. Harcourt D, Russell C, Hughes J, et al. Patient satisfaction in relation to nipple reconstruction: the importance of information provision. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:494-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.06.008
  16. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:457-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200208000-00013
  17. Guerra AB, Khoobehi K, Metzinger SE, et al. New technique for nipple areola reconstruction: arrow flap and rib cartilage graft for long-lasting nipple projection. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:31-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200301000-00006
  18. Yanaga H. Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap: technical improvement from rolled auricular cartilage to artificial bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1863-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000091243.42112.32
  19. Caterson SA, Singh M, Talbot SG, et al. Reconstruction of areolar projection using a purse-string suture technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:e453. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000431
  20. Peled IJ. Purse-string suture for nipple projection. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:1480-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199904050-00020
  21. Weinfeld AB, Somia N, Codner MA. Purse-string nipple areolar reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61:364-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31815d898a