Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of University Students' Learning flow, Self-Directed Learning, and Learning Outcomes on Uncontacted Online Class Satisfaction

대학생의 학습몰입, 자기주도학습, 학습성과가 비대면 온라인 수업만족도 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2021.01.07
  • Accepted : 2021.04.20
  • Published : 2021.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a descriptive research study to verify the relationship between university students' learning flow, self-directed learning, learning outcomes, and online class satisfaction, and to identify factors that influence online class satisfaction. There was a significant positive correlation between university students' learning flow, self-directed learning, learning outcomes, and online class satisfaction. Online class satisfaction had a positive effect on learning flow and learning outcomes, but self-directed learning had no direct effect. The explanatory power of online class satisfaction was 49%. Based on the above results, in order to increase online class satisfaction, a plan is needed to improve university students' learning flow and learning outcomes for online classes. In addition, instructor and university are required to actively endeavor and support to improve the quality of online classes.

본 연구는 대학생의 학습몰입, 자기주도학습, 학습성과가 온라인 수업만족도에 미치는 영향요인을 파악하여 비대면 온라인 수업의 효과를 극대화하고, 활성화할 방안의 기초자료를 제공하고자 시도된 서술적 조사연구이다. 대학생의 학습몰입, 자기주도학습, 학습성과, 온라인 수업만족도는 유의한 정적인 상관관계를 보였고, 온라인 수업만족도에 학습몰입, 학습성과는 정적인 영향이 있었으나 자기주도학습은 직접적인 영향은 없었다. 온라인 수업만족도에 대한 설명력은 49%였다. 본 연구결과에 따라 온라인 수업만족도를 높이기 위해서 온라인 수업에 대한 대학생의 학습몰입, 학습성과를 향상시킬 방안이 필요하다. 또한 교수자와 대학은 온라인 수업의 질적인 향상을 위한 적극적인 노력과 지원이 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. C. B. Aslanian & D. L. Clinefelter. (2013). Online College Students 2013. Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. The Learning House. Inc, Louisville, KY.
  2. P. Witkowski & T. Cornell. (2015). An Investigation into Student Engagement in Higher ducation Classrooms. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10. 56-67. https://doi.org/10.46504/10201505wi
  3. R. A. Croxton. (2014). The Role of Interactivity in Student Satisfaction and Persistence in Online Learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2). 314-325.
  4. R. Ali & E. M. Leeds. (2009). The Impact of Face-to-Face Orientation on Online Retention: A Pilot Study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(4). 1-10.
  5. J. Y. Park. (2017). The Effects of University Students' Self-Directed Learning Ability and Perceived Online Task Value on Learning Satisfaction and Academic Achievement. English Language Teaching, 29(3). 165-185. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17936/pkelt.2017.29.3.8
  6. S. J. Lee, S. Srinivasan, T. Trail, D. Lewis & S. Lopez. (2011). Examining the Relationship among Student Perception of Support, Course Satisfaction, and Learning Outcomes in Online Learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3). 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
  7. Y. Cao & S. Sakchutchawan. (2011). Online vs. Traditional MBA: an Empirical Study of Students' Characteristics, Course Satisfaction, and Overall Success'. Journal of Human Resources and Adult Learning, 7(2). 1-12.
  8. J. H. Lee. (2010). Analysis of the Structural Relationships among Self-Determination Motivation to Learn, Metacognition, Self-Directed Learning Ability, Learning Flow, and School Achievement. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 48(2). 67-92.
  9. Y. J. Joo, A. K. Chung & E. G. Lim. (2012). The Prediction of Academic Self-Efficacy, Learning Flow, Academic Stress, and Emotional Exhaustion on Course Satisfaction of Cyber University Students. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 15(3). 61-69. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2015.15.4.169
  10. E. J. Kim. (2015). Examining Structural Relationships Among College Students' Internal and External Factors for Learning Engagement and Satisfaction. Asian Journal of Education, 16(3), 107-129. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2015.09.16.3.107
  11. Chou, P. N. (2012). Effect of Students' Self-directed Learning Abilities on Online Learning Outcomes: Two Exploratory Experiments in Electronic Engineering. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(6). 172-179.
  12. N. S. Seo, S. J. Woo & Y. J. Ha. (2015). The Effects of Self-Directed Learning Ability and Motivation on Learning Satisfaction of Nursing Students in Convergence Blended Learning Environment. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(9). 11-19. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.9.11
  13. G. J. Lee & J. M. Lee. (2015). A Study on the Factors Associated with Students Satisfaction with and Outcomes of Higher Education. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 33(1). 105-127.
  14. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
  15. S. H. Lee. (2015). Analysis of the structural relationships among fun, learning flow, team learning activities and learning satisfaction in PBL environment : focused on the social service personnel job training education. Master's Thesis, Seoul: The Graduate School of Graduate Konkuk University.
  16. L. Guglielmino & J. Paul. (1977). Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS). Boca Raton, Florida: Guglielmino and Associates.
  17. K. H. Kim & G. H. Lee. (2020). Analysis of the Structural Relations among Self-directed Learning, Learning Flow, Academic Self-efficacy, Career Decision Self-efficacy, and Key Competencies of University Students. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 28(4). 117-143. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.18230/tjye.2020.28.4.117
  18. E. J. Bae (2018). The effect of hotel educational service's quality on perceived value and learning transfer: with focus on online and offline education. doctoral Thesis, Kyonggido: The Graduate School of Kyonggi University.
  19. J. R. Han & J. M. Kim. (2017). The Mediating Effects of Self-efficacy between Metacognition and Learning Flow in College Students in Healthcare Field. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(6). 273-282. DOI : https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.6.273
  20. E. Y. Chin & C. H. Jung. (2020). The Effect of Mental Well-being, Professor Trust, and Learning Flow on Adaptation to College Life Adjustment in Nursing Students. Health & Welfa, 22(1). 151-176. DOI : https://doi.org/10.23948/kshw.2020.03.22.1.151
  21. S. J. Jeon & H. H. Yoo. (2020). Relationship between General Characteristics, Learning Flow, Self-Directedness and Learner Satisfaction of Medical Students in Online Learning Environment. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association , 20(8), 65-74. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.08.065
  22. Y. Lee & D. Shin. (2020). An Investigation of the Implementation of Online Classes in the Untact Era Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 23(4), 39-57. DOI : https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2020.23.4.39
  23. N. Dabbagh. (2007). The Online Learner: Characteristics and Pedagogical Implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3). 217-226.
  24. K. S. Jang, N. Y. Kim & H. Park. (2014). Effects of an Action Learning Based Creative Problem-solving Course for Nursing Students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 20(5). 587-598. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.5.587
  25. J. H. Yang, B. R. Cho & I. S. Hwang. (2020). Effects of CELL Curriculum Participation on College Students' Learning Flow, Learning Motivation, Academic Self-efficacy, and Self-directed Learning Ability. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(8), 55-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.8.055
  26. S. G. Lee, S. B. Choi & H. W. Kim. (2019). An Exploratory Study of E-learning Satisfaction : a Mixed Methods of Text Mining and Interview Approaches. Information Systems Review, 21(1). 39-59. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.14329/isr.2019.21.1.039
  27. S. Cuschieri & J. Calleja Agius. (2020). Spotlight on the Shift to Remote Anatomical Teaching During Covid 19 Pandemic: Perspectives and Experiences from the University of Malta. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(6), 671-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2020
  28. M. N. Choi & H. R. Rho. (2016). The Analysis of Learner Characters, E-learning Academic Achievement, E-learning Satisfaction and Motive to Take Mobile Learning Courses According to a Student's Learning Style in University. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(1). 555-570.
  29. M. G. Lee, E. Cho & H. Lim. (2021). Exploring the Online Learning Experience of College Students Majoring Physical Education in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(1), 421-430. DOI: http://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.1.421
  30. S. Y. Kim, M. J. Kang & S. H. Yoon. (2017). The Predictability of Academic Self-regulation, Self-determination, and Flow on the Satisfaction of Flipped Learning in Uiversity. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(5). 91-109. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.5.91
  31. J. W. Lee & J. E. Lee. (2018). The Effects of Factors Affecting Computer Accounting Class in Universities on Satisfaction with Class and Learning Outcomes. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 31(11). 2063-2078. DOI : https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2018.31.11.2063
  32. S. B. Merriam. (2001). Andragogy and Self-directed: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3
  33. J. Y. Choi & S. H. Sok. (2016). Investigating Determinants of Institutional Commitment during College and Its Effect on Academic Performance. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 34(2). 1-22.
  34. H. S. Kim & Y. L. Yu. (2016). The Effects of Fidelity of Implementation in Classes on Undergraduates' Learning Outcome. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 29(1). 147-175.
  35. B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, & K. Jones. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
  36. H. F. Lin. (2007). "Measuring Online Learning Systems Success: Applying the Updated DeLone and McLean Model". Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(6). 817-820. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9948