디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권4호
  • /
  • Pages.241-249
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

영어 듣기와 읽기 수업을 위한 블렌디드 러닝 사례 연구

A Case Study of a Blended Learning for English Listening and Reading Class

  • 최미양 (숭실대학교 베어드 교양대학)
  • Choi, Mi Yang (Baird Liberal Arts College, Soongsil University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.22
  • 심사 : 2021.04.20
  • 발행 : 2021.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 영어 듣기와 읽기 수업을 위한 블렌디드 러닝에서 학생들의 학습행태를 파악함으로써 그 교육적 효과를 진단하는 사례연구이다. 연구대상은 Academic English Listening and Reading 과목을 수강했던 75명의 학생이며 연구도구는 2차례 실시한 설문이다. 연구 결과 영어듣기를 위한 온라인 수업에서 학생들은 스크립트를 보거나 교수 동영상 강의를 보고 듣기 퀴즈를 풀고 있었으며, 예습의 역할을 하고 있는 스크립트 요약 과제의 경우 번역본을 찾아보는 등의 바람직하지 않은 학습행태를 형성했음을 알 수 있었다. 반면 오프라인 수업에서 학생들은 조별활동에 성실하게 참여했으며 교수 해설 강의에 잘 집중하는 모습을 보여주었다. 따라서 학생들의 바람직하지 않은 온라인 수업의 학습행태를 감안할 때 이 블렌디드 러닝은 면대면 수업에 비하여 교육적 효과가 떨어진다고 판단되었다. 이에 이러한 부정적인 학습행태를 개선하기 위한 해결책들을 논의하였다.

This study is investigating the effectiveness of a blended learning for English listening and reading class by analyzing students' learning behavior. To this end, two surveys were conducted on a total of 75 students from the two different classes of Academic English Listening and Reading course. The research results showed that in the online class, the students built undesirable learning behavior such as solving listening quizzes by reading listening scripts or watching the instructor's lectures about the scripts and completing the assignment of summary of the scripts by referring to the Korean versions. In the offline class, the students' participation in group activities and attention to lectures was good. Therefore, it can be concluded that because of the students' poor online learning behavior, this blended learning was rather not effective. So the suggestions are discussed to enhance the effectiveness of the blended learning for English listening and reading.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. Kwon, E. Moon, & I. Park. (2015). A meta-analysis on effects of blended learning in Korea. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(3), 333-359.
  2. S. K. Jung. (2010). A study on the effective blended learning model for cyber English classes at the college level. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 13(3), 253-278. https://doi.org/10.15702/MALL.2010.13.3.253
  3. K. J. Lee. (2011). The development and valuation of the blended learning system using interactive feedback. Korean Business Education Review, 26(1), 513-533.
  4. M. Y. Choi. (2017). A study on the use of ICT for students' active class participation: focused on college English reading class. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(10), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.419
  5. J. H. Park. (2005). A study on teaching English through movies: on the basis of the cultural context. STEM Journal, 6(1), 45-69.
  6. J. S. Ok. (2012). An effective screen English teaching model: with an emphasis on teaching English pronunciations and American cultures in Prime. STEM Journal, 13(1), 105-127.
  7. M. Y. Choi. (2017) A study on the usage of smartphones for English listening activity. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(4), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.4.451
  8. T. I. Han & M. Y. Choi. (2014). A study on the influence of a blended TOEIC class on its student achievement in a university. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 16(1), 231-240.
  9. S. I. Park, S. E. Lee, & J. E. Song. (2007). Major factors influencing effective on/offline learning on the blended learning in higher education. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 5(1), 17-45.
  10. J. Woo, B. Kim, & O. Lee. (2009). A study on the blended learning as an alternative of face-to-face learning in university. The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 7(2), 219-225.
  11. Y. Cha & H. Kim. (2011). Implementation of instructional methods and learners' views in online/offline business English classes. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 14(3), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2011.14.3.11
  12. H. M. Kim & J. R. Kim. (2019). A meta-analysis of English education researches using blended learning and flipped Learning. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(21), 241-258.
  13. J. Kim & H. Kim. (2012). Developing a blended instructional learning model optimized for English teaching at off-line universities. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2012.15.1.135
  14. C. Dziuban, J. Hartman, F. Juge, P. Moskal, & S. Sorg. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
  15. M. S. Han. (2006). The effects of e-learning, b-learning and classroom learning on the acquisition of content knowledge and the improvement of English proficiency. English Education Research, 18(2), 323-339.
  16. O. Lee. (2008). A study on achievement of blended learning and face-to-face learning. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 15(1), 1-27.
  17. J. Utts, B. Sommer, C. Acredolo, M. W. Maher, & H. R. Matthews. (2003). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory Statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education, 11(3), 1-19.
  18. D. K. Larson & C. Sung. (2009). Comparing student performance: online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31-42.
  19. O. H. Lee. (2007). A study on the satisfaction of learner's instruction of blended learning and traditional face-to-face learning in university. Educational Research, 41, 1-24.
  20. N. Vernadakis, M. Giannousi, E. Tsitskari, P. Antoniou, & E. Kioumourtzoglou. (2012). A comparison of student satisfaction between traditional and blended technology course offerings in physical education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 137-147.
  21. C. C. Chen & K. T. Jones. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: assessing effectiveness and students perceptions in an MBA Accounting course. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1-15.
  22. D. H. Han & B. Chun. (2015). Analysis of learning type factors that affect e-learning performance: centering on the comparison analysis of whole learners log and excellent learners. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 17(2), 897-912.
  23. J. Kang. (2007). Evaluating learners' behaviors in a web-based instructional program. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 19(2), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2007.19.2.123
  24. E. Lee. (2019). Analysis of learning behavior and effect factors on the completion of Open High School learners through learning analytic approach. The Journal of Research in Education, 32(4), 29-54.
  25. S. Lee, K. Choi, M. Park, & J. Han. (2020). Investigating learning type in online problem-based learning: applying learning analysis techniques. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 23(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2020.23.1.007
  26. Y. J. Joo, J. Lee, & S. Cho. (2012). Moderating effects of academic self-efficacy and task-value between academic stress and achievement in cyber university. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 8(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.26857/JLLS.2012.04.8.1.73