한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구 (The Journal of Information Systems)

  • 제30권1호
  • /
  • Pages.105-121
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-8476(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8770(eISSN)
한국정보시스템학회 (Korea Association of Information Systems)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털그림자노동의 분류와 동태성 및 연구 방향

Classification, Dynamics, and Research Direction in Digital Shadow Work

  • 투고 : 2021.03.02
  • 심사 : 2021.03.30
  • 발행 : 2021.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose Today, through digital services, many people enjoy a conveient and comfortable life. Nevertheless, it is easy to find people in our daily lives who are buried in work without any payment that we did not do before digital services. Such un-payed works under digital environment are called digital shadow works. The purpose of this study is to classification and dynamics of digital shadow works and to suggest research direction. Design/methodology/approach Based on two dimension, voluntary participation ('should' type and 'want' type) and work orientation (management-operation), digital shadow works were classified into four categories - chore, makeup, routine, and quest. Findings In digital shadow work there are four types of dynamics - routine and quest, makeup and chore, makeup and quest, and quest and actions in offline. According to the classification and analysis of dynamics, three research directions in digital shadow work are suggested and discussed- digital shadow works operation mechanism considering dynamics, expansion of existing user theories based on survey method by digital shadow works and social influences by digital shadow works.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박상철, 류성열, "맥도날디제이션 관점에서 본 SST 사용자의 그림자 노동", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 제20권, 제1호, 2020, pp. 99-115.
  2. 박상철, 이웅규, 고준, 류성열, "디지털 기술 환경에서의 그림자 노동 메커니즘 규명연구", 경영학연구, 제49권, 제1호, 2020, pp, 31-50.
  3. 박상철, 이웅규, "근거이론을 활용한 멀티채널 사용자의 크로스오버 쇼핑행동이해," Information Systems Review, 제19권, 제3호, 2017, pp.179-199. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2017.19.3.179
  4. 류성열, 박상철, "'정보시스템연구'의 연구주제와 서베이 방법론 동향분석", 정보시스템연구, 제27권, 제4호, 2018, pp. 1-33.
  5. 이웅규, "우리나라 정보시스템 연구에서 근거이론방법론 현황 분석 적용 지침 제시", 정보시스템연구, 제29권, 제1호, 2020, pp, 181-199.
  6. 이웅규, "일시적 비사용과 사용 간의 동태적 상태 변화에 대한 연구: 근거이론방법론에 의한 접근", 정보시스템연구, 제28권, 제4호, 2019, pp. 359-375,
  7. 이웅규, "정보기술 비사용의 결정요인과 동태적 성격의 규명: 근거이론방법론에 의한 질적연구," 정보시스템연구, 제27권, 제1호, 2018, pp.1-20.
  8. 이웅규, "정보기술 사용에서의 전유가 내재적/외재적 동기 및 사용용이성에 미치는 영향: 블로그 사용자들을 중심으로", 한국경영과학회지, 제33권, 제1호, 2008, pp. 131-148.
  9. 이웅규, 김효정, "사용 습관이 새로운 정보기술수용에 미치는 두 가지 상반되는 효과: 전문성과 고착현상", 지식경영연구, 제12권, 제5호, 2011, pp. 11-23.
  10. Birk, D. F., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., and Nasirin, S., "Grounded Theory Method in Information Systems Research: its Nature, Diversity and Opportunities", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 22, 2013, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.48
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Flow - the Psychology of Optimal Expereience, Harper Perennial, 2008.
  12. Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology", MIS Quarterly, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  13. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R., "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: a Comparison of two Theoretical Models", Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 903-1028. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.903
  14. DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M. S., "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory", Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1994, pp. 121-287. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  15. de Guinea, A. O. and Markus, M. L., "Why Break the Habit of a Lifetime? Rethinking the Roles of Intention, Habit, and Emotion in Continuing Information Technology Use", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2009, pp. 433-444. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650303
  16. Ivan, I., Shadow Work. Salem, New Hampshire and London: Marion Boyars, 1981.
  17. Lambert, C., Shadow Work, the Unpaid, Unseen Jobs that Fills your Day, Counterpoint, Berkeley, 2015.
  18. Lee, W-K, "An Analysis of the Roles of Experience in Information System Continuance", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2011a, pp. 45-62.
  19. Limayemm M., Hirt, S. G., and Cheung, C. M. K., "How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: the Case of Information Systems Continuance", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2007, pp. 705-737. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817
  20. Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., nd Myers, M. D., "Putting the 'Theory' Back into Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Grounded Theory Studies in Information Systems", Information Systems Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 4, 2010, pp. 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
  21. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  22. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., and Bala, H., "Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2013, pp. 21-54. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02