DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Birth cohort effects on maternal and child environmental health: a systematic review

모아의 환경적 건강에 대한 출산 코호트 효과: 체계적 고찰

  • Chae, JungMi (Review & Assessment Research Department, HIRA Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Kyoung (Department of Nursing, Kongju National University)
  • 채정미 (건강보험심사평가원 심사평가연구실) ;
  • 김현경 (국립공주대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2020.11.16
  • Accepted : 2021.03.12
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to review recent findings from birth cohort studies on maternal and child environmental health. Methods: Birth cohort studies regarding environmental health outcomes for mothers and their children were investigated through a systematic review. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and RISS to identify published studies using the keywords using a combination of the following keywords: maternal exposure, environmental exposure, health, cohort, and birth cohort. Articles were searched and a quality appraisal using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies was done. Results: A review of the 14 selected studies revealed that prenatal and early life exposure to environmental pollutants had negative impacts on physical, cognitive, and behavioral development among mothers and children up to 12 years later. Environmental pollutants included endocrine disruptors, air pollution (e.g., particulate matter), and heavy metals. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that exposure to environmental pollutants negatively influences maternal and children's environmental health outcomes from pregnancy to the early years of life. Therefore, maternal health care professionals should take steps to reduce mothers' and children's exposure to environmental pollutants.

Keywords

References

  1. Hojo S, Mizukoshi A, Azuma K, Okumura J, Ishikawa S, Miyata M, et al. Survey on changes in subjective symptoms, onset/trigger factors, allergic diseases, and chemical exposures in the past decade of Japanese patients with multiple chemical sensitivity. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(8):1085-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.08.001
  2. Edokpolo B, Allaz-Barnett N, Irwin C, Issa J, Curtis P, Green B, et al. Developing a conceptual framework for environmental health tracking in Victoria, Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101748
  3. Larranaga I, Santa-Marina L, Molinuevo A, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Fernandez-Somoano A, Jimenez-Zabala A, et al. Poor mothers, unhealthy children: the transmission of health inequalities in the INMA study, Spain. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29(3):568-574. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky239
  4. Pell T, Eliot M, Chen A, Lanphear BP, Yolton K, Sathyanarayana S, et al. Parental concern about environmental chemical exposures and children's urinary concentrations of phthalates and phenols. J Pediatr. 2017;186:138-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.064
  5. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, et al. EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1-E150. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1010
  6. Vabre P, Gatimel N, Moreau J, Gayrard V, Picard-Hagen N, Parinaud J, et al. Environmental pollutants, a possible etiology for premature ovarian insufficiency: a narrative review of animal and human data. Environ Health. 2017;16(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0242-4
  7. Albouy-Llaty M, Limousi F, Carles C, Dupuis A, Rabouan S, Migeot V. Association between exposure to endocrine disruptors in drinking water and preterm birth, taking neighborhood deprivation into account: a historic cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(796):2-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080796
  8. Doherty BT, Engel SM, Buckley JP, Silva MJ, Calafat AM, Wolff MS. Prenatal phthalate biomarker concentrations and performance on the Bayley Scale of Infant Development-II in a population of young urban children. Environ Res. 2017;152:51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.09.021
  9. Botton J, Philippat C, Calafat AM, Carles S, Charles MA, Slama R, et al. Phthalate pregnancy exposure and male offspring growth from the intra-uterine period to five years of age. Environ Res. 2016;151:601-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.08.033
  10. Marsillach J, Costa LG, Furlong CE. Paraoxonase-1 and early-life environmental exposure. Ann Glob Health. 2016; 82(1):100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2016.01.009
  11. Abad M, Malekafzali CH, Simbar M, Mosaavi HS, Khoei EM. Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran. Iranian J Reprod Med. 2016;14(5):347-354. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijrm.14.5.347
  12. Rahman A, Kumarathasan P, Gomes J. Infant and mother related outcomes from exposure to metals with endocrine disrupting properties during pregnancy. Sci Total Environ. 2016;569-570:1022-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.134
  13. Guo LQ, Chen Y, Mi BB, Dang SN, Zhao DD, Liu R, et al. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2019;20(3):238-252. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1800122
  14. Pansieri C, Pandolfini C, Clavenna A, Choonara I, Bonati M. An inventory of European birth cohorts. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093071
  15. Kim SY, Park JE, Seo HJ, Lee YJ, Jang BH, Son HJ, et al. NECA's guidance for understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Collaborating Agency; 2011.
  16. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [Internet]. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 [cited 2019 Dec 3]. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org
  17. Bidwell S, Jensen MF. Etext on Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information resources. Chapter 3: using a search protocol to identify sources of information: the COSI model [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2003 [updated 2003 Jun 14; cited 2019 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20060905/nichsr/ehta/chapter3.html#COSI
  18. Morgan RL, Thayer KA, Bero L, Bruce N, Falck-Ytter Y, Ghersi D, et al. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ Int. 2016;92-93:611-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004
  19. Ma LL, Wang YY, Yang ZH, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng XT. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Mil Med Res. 2020;7(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
  20. Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; c2021 [cited 2020 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
  21. Hong YC, Kulkarni SS, Lim YH, Kim E, Ha M, Park H, et al. Postnatal growth following prenatal lead exposure and calcium intake. Pediatrics. 2014;134(6):1151-1159. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1658
  22. Vafeiadi M, Agramunt S, Pedersen M, Besselink H, Chatzi L, Fthenou E, et al. In utero exposure to compounds with dioxin-like activity and birth outcomes. Epidemiol. 2014;25(2):215-224. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000046
  23. Jiang M, Qiu J, Zhou M, He X, Cui H, Lerro C, et al. Exposure to cooking fuels and birth weight in Lanzhou, China: a birth cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:712. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2038-1
  24. Aker AM, Watkins DJ, Johns LE, Ferguson KK, Soldin OP, Anzalota Del Toro LV, et al. Phenols and parabens in relation to reproductive and thyroid hormones in pregnant women. Environ Res. 2016;151:30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.002
  25. Jusko TA, De Roos AJ, Lee SY, Thevenet-Morrison K, Schwartz SM, Verner MA, et al. A birth cohort study of maternal and infant serum PCB-153 and DDE concentrations and responses to infant tuberculosis vaccination. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(6):813-821. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510101
  26. Bougas N, Ranciere F, Beydon N, Viola M, Perrot X, Gabet S, et al. Traffic-related air Pollution, lung function, and host vulnerability. New insights from the PARIS birth cohort. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(5):599-607. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201711-900OC
  27. Fioravanti S, Cesaroni G, Badaloni C, Michelozzi P, Forastiere F, Porta D. Traffic-related air pollution and childhood obesity in an Italian birth cohort. Environ Res. 2018;160:479-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.003
  28. Haug LS, Sakhi AK, Cequier E, Casas M, Maitre L, Basagana X, et al. In-utero and childhood chemical exposome in six European mother-child cohorts. Environ Int. 2018;121(1):751-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.056
  29. Impinen A, Nygaard UC, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Mowinckel P, Carlsen KH, Haug LS, et al. Prenatal exposure to perfluoralkyl substances (PFASs) associated with respiratory tract infections but not allergy- and asthma-related health outcomes in childhood. Environ Res. 2018;160:518-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.012
  30. Kampouri M, Kyriklaki A, Roumeliotaki T, Koutra K, Anousaki D, Sarri K, et al. Patterns of early-life social and environmental exposures and child cognitive development, Rhea birth cohort, Crete, Greece. Child Develop. 2018;89(4):1063-1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12782
  31. Clemente D, Vrijheid M, Martens DS, Bustamante M, Chatzi L, Danileviciute A, et al. Prenatal and childhood traffic-related air pollution exposure and telomere length in European children: the HELIX project. Environ Health Perspect. 2019; 127(8):87001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4148
  32. Madhloum N, Nawrot TS, Gyselaers W, Roels HA, Bijnens E, Vanpoucke C, et al. Neonatal blood pressure in association with prenatal air pollution exposure, traffic, and land use indicators: An ENVIRONAGE birth cohort study. Environ Int. 2019;130:104853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.047
  33. Philippat C, Heude B, Botton J, Alfaidy N, Calafat AM, Slama R, et al. Prenatal exposure to select phthalates and phenols and associations with fetal and placental weight among male births in the EDEN cohort (France). Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(1):17002. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3523
  34. Shah S, Jeong KS, Park H, Hong YC, Kim Y, Kim B, et al. Environmental pollutants affecting children's growth and development: collective results from the MOCEH study, a multi-centric prospective birth cohort in Korea. Environ Int. 2020;137: 105547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105547
  35. Mallozzi M, Bordi G, Garo C, Caserta D. The effect of maternal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals on fetal and neonatal development: a review on the major concerns. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2016;108(3):224-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.21137
  36. Lee YM, Hong YC, Ha MN, Kim YH, Park HS, Kim HS, et al. Prenatal bisphenol-A exposure affects fetal length growth by maternal glutathione transferase polymorphisms, and neonatal exposure affects child volume growth by sex: from multi-regional prospective birth cohort MOCEH study. Sci Total Environ. 2018;612:1433-1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.317
  37. Brandstetter S, Toncheva AA, Niggel J, Wolff C, Gran S, Seelbach-Gobel B, et al. KUNO-Kids birth cohort study: rationale, design, and cohort description. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2019;6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-018-0088-z

Cited by

  1. 카툰 코믹스를 이용한 환경적 건강행위 산전교육 개발과 평가 vol.51, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.21083