Nutrition Research and Practice

  • 제15권2호
  • /
  • Pages.235-247
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1976-1457(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-6168(eISSN)
한국영양학회 (The Korean Nutrition Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the effect of a school garden as an educational didactic tool in vegetable and fruit consumption in teenagers

  • 투고 : 2019.08.18
  • 심사 : 2020.06.19
  • 발행 : 2021.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Increasing the consumption of vegetables and fruits in Mexico remains a challenge. Promoting sustainable food production systems through schools may be an effective way to educate young people about food and nutrition issues. A study of nutritional education in adolescents, based on the school garden, is necessary in order to evaluate its effects on the consumption of fruits and vegetables among middle- and upper-income segments of the population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an educational intervention, accompanied by a school garden as an educational teaching tool, to improve vegetable and fruit consumption by Mexican teenagers attending a private middle/high school. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Teenagers between 12 and 18 years of age (n = 126) attending a private middle/high school in Queretaro, Mexico participated in a 3-arm, controlled, comparative impact study using a vegetable and fruit consumption frequency questionnaire, food consumption diaries, a psychosocial factor assessment questionnaire of vegetable and fruit consumption, and structured interviews. The participants were randomized into 3 experimental groups: 1) food education + school garden (FE + SG), 2) FE only, and 3) control group (CG). RESULTS: The FE + SG and FE groups significantly increased the frequency and daily intake of vegetables and fruits compared to the CG. The FE + SG group showed greater understanding of, reflection upon, and analysis of the information they received about vegetable and fruit consumption, as well as a greater willingness to include these in their daily diet. CONCLUSIONS: FE accompanied by a SG as a teaching tool is more effective at promoting vegetable and fruit consumption than either education alone or control in teenagers in middle-upper income segments of the population.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series: 916. Geneva: WHO; 2003. p.1-30.
  2. Gao Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Liu F, Feng CX, Liu T, Li C, Ling DD, Mu Y, Tarver SL, Wang M, Sun W. Evaluation of fast food behavior in pre-school children and parents following a one-year intervention with nutrition education. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:6780-90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110706780
  3. Ramirez-Silva I, Rivera JA, Ponce X, Hernandez-Avila M. Fruit and vegetable intake in the Mexican population: results from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2006. Salud Publica Mex 2009;51 Suppl 4:S574-85.
  4. Bai Y, Kim YH, Han YH, Hyun T. Impact of a school-based culinary nutrition education program on vegetable consumption behavior, intention, and personal factors among Korean second-graders. Nutr Res Pract 2018;12:527-34. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2018.12.6.527
  5. Choi EB, Lee JE, Hwang JY. Fruit and vegetable intakes in relation to behavioral outcomes associated with a nutrition education intervention in preschoolers. Nutr Res Pract 2018;12:521-6. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2018.12.6.521
  6. Gibbs L, Staiger PK, Johnson B, Block K, Macfarlane S, Gold L, Kulas J, Townsend M, Long C, Ukoumunne O. Expanding children's food experiences: the impact of a school-based kitchen garden program. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45:137-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2012.09.004
  7. Morgan PJ, Warren JM, Lubans DR, Saunders KL, Quick GI, Collins CE. The impact of nutrition education with and without a school garden on knowledge, vegetable intake and preferences and quality of school life among primary-school students. Public Health Nutr 2010;13:1931-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980010000959
  8. Hazzard EL, Moreno E, Beall DL, Zidenberg-Cherr S. Factors contributing to a school's decision to apply for the California Instructional School Garden Program. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012;44:379-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2011.08.001
  9. Graham H, Zidenberg-Cherr S. California teachers perceive school gardens as an effective nutritional tool to promote healthful eating habits. J Am Diet Assoc 2005;105:1797-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2005.08.034
  10. Barale K, Gaolach B, Wells NM, Myers BM, Ferenz G, Aitken M, Gao JC. Healthy Gardens, Healthy Youth. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014;46:S137-8.
  11. Garcia Retana JÁ. Educational model based in competenciy: importance and necessity. Actual Investig Educ 2011;11:1-24.
  12. Rychen DS, Salganik LH. Las Competencias Clave Para el Bienestar Personal, Social y Economico. 1st ed. Granada: Ensenanza Abierta de Andalucia, Consorcio Fernando de los Rios; 2006.
  13. Pimienta J. Metodologia Constructivista Guia Para la Planeacion Docente. 2nd ed. Naucalpan de Juarez: Pearson Education; 2007.
  14. Serrano JM, Parra RM. Constructivism today: constructivist approaches in education. Rev Actual Investig Educ 2011;13:1-27.
  15. Narvaez E. Una mirada a la escuela nueva. Educere 2006;10:629-36.
  16. Jaimez CR, Miranda KS, Moranchel M, Vazquez E, Vazquez F. Innovacion Educativa y Apropiacion Tecnologica: Experiencias Docentes con el Uso de las TIC. 3rd ed. Mexico: Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana; 2015.
  17. Sancho Gil JM. Tecnologias Para Transformar la Educacion. 1st ed. Madrid: Akal Ediciones; 2006.
  18. Jeavons J, Cox C, Jeavons J. The Sustainable Vegetable Garden: a Backyard Guide to Healthy Soil and Higher Yields. 1st ed. Willits: Ten Speed Press; 1999.
  19. Denckla T, Alcorn S. The Gardener's A-Z Guide to Growing Organic Food. 2nd ed. North Adams: Storey Publishing; 2003.
  20. Sherman J, Muehlhoff E. Setting Up and Running a School Garden. 1st ed. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009.
  21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. El Huerto Escolar como Recurso de EnsenanzaAprendizaje de las Asignaturas del curriculo de Educion Basica [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2009 [cited 2018 May 3]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/am042s/am042s00.htm.
  22. Mercon J, Escalona-Aguila MA, Noriega Armella MI, Figueroa Nune II, Atenco Sanchez A, Gonzalez Mendez ED. Cultivando la educacion agroecologica. Rev Mex Investig Educ 2012;17:1201-24.
  23. Diaz Barriga A. El enfoque de competencias en la educacion: ¿Una alternativa o un disfraz de cambio? Perf Educ 2006;28:7-36.
  24. Rodriguez IT, Ballart JF, Pastor GC, Jorda EB, Val VA. Validation of a short questionnaire on frequency of dietary intake: reproducibility and validity. Nutr Hosp 2008;23:242-52.
  25. Palenzuela Paniagua SM, Perez Milena A, Perula de Torres LA, Fernandez Garcia JA, Maldonado Alconada J. Food consumption patterns among adolescents. An Sist Sanit Navar 2014;37:47-58. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272014000100006
  26. Ferrari MA. Intake estimation by means of a 24-hour reminder. Diaeta (B Aires) 2013;31:20-5.
  27. INCMNSZ. Tables of Composition of Mexican Foods and Food Products. Ciudad de Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran; 2016.
  28. Ochoa-Meza G, Sierra JC, Perez-Rodrigo C, Aranceta Bartrina J, Esparza-Del Villar OA. Reliability and validity of a Mexican version of the Pro Children Project questionnaire. Nutr Hosp 2014;30:293-300.
  29. Mertens DM. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.
  30. Hernandez Sampieri R, Fernandez Collado C, Baptista Lucio P. Metodologia de la Investigacion. Ciudad de Mexico: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
  31. McAleese JD, Rankin LL. Garden-based nutrition education affects fruit and vegetable consumption in sixth-grade adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:662-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.015
  32. Loso J, Staub D, Colby SE, Olfert MD, Kattelmann K, Vilaro M, Colee J, Zhou W, Franzen-Castle L, Mathews AE. Gardening experience is associated with increased fruit and vegetable intake among firstyear college students: a cross-sectional examination. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018;118:275-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.005
  33. Zacarias I, Keller I, Muzzo S. Programes 5 a day for the promotion of consumption of vegetables and fruits. Rev Chil Nutr 2006;33:222-3.
  34. Bontrager Yoder AB, Liebhart JL, McCarty DJ, Meinen A, Schoeller D, Vargas C, LaRowe T. Farm to elementary school programming increases access to fruits and vegetables and increases their consumption among those with low intake. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014;46:341-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.04.297
  35. Greer AE, Davis S, Sandolo C, Gaudet N, Castrogivanni B. Agricultural experiences are positively associated with high school students' fruit and vegetable perceptions and consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav 2018;50:133-140.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.08.009
  36. Bell S. Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future. Clearing House 2010;83:39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
  37. Huesca Reynoso L, Lopez Salazar R, Palacios Esquer MR. The food support program and the comprehensive social policy in the crusade against hunger in Mexico. Rev Mex Cienc Polit Soc 2016;61:379-407.
  38. Bucher K. Opening garden gates: teachers making meaning of school gardens in Havana and Philadelphia. Teach Teach Educ 2017;63:12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.003
  39. Pena Fernandez E, Maria Reidl Martinez L. Las emociones y la conducta alimentaria. Acta Investig Psicol 2015;5:2182-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-4719(16)30008-4
  40. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. The Science of Adolescent Risk-Taking. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2011.
  41. National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics. National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure (ENIGH). 2018 New Series [Internet]. Aguascalientes City: INEGI; 2018 [cited 2020 March 22]. Available from: https://en.www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enigh/nc/2018/.