Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Simulation Program using Immersive Virtual Reality: Meta-analysis

몰입형 가상현실 시뮬레이션 프로그램의 효과: 메타분석

  • Received : 2021.01.06
  • Accepted : 2021.03.20
  • Published : 2021.03.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of simulation program using virtual reality (VR). Examination of databases resulted in identification of 1,415 studies of which 3 satisfied the inclusion data. Data analysis was performed using R version 4.0.2 to calculate the effect sizes, explore possible causes of heterogeneity, and check for publication bias, using a funnel plot. The mean effect size of the simulation program was medium (g=0.35), along with the skill performance (g=0.59), satisfaction (g=0.38), knowledge (g=0.21). Finally a funnel plot was produced to check for publication bias, but no significant bias was detected. Based on these findings, the simulation program using VR affects nursing education.

본 연구는 몰입형 가상현실 시뮬레이션 프로그램의 효과를 파악하기 위해 가상현실 시뮬레이션을 적용한 논문의 결과를 대상으로 실시한 메타분석 연구이다. 2020년 11월까지 국내·외 가상현실 시뮬레이션을 적용한 학술지 논문의 전수를 '몰입형', '가상현실', '시뮬레이션' 등의 검색어를 조합하여 총 1,415편의 논문이 검색되었으며, 비중재연구, 초록이나 단행본, 효과크기 산출이 불가능한 연구를 배제하여 총 3편의 논문이 선정되었다. 자료는 R version 4.0.2 program 효과크기 산출, 이질성 및 출간오류분석을 시행하였다. 몰입형 가상현실 시뮬레이션 프로그램의 평균 효과크기는 0.35로 중간정도의 효과크기를 나타냈으며, 결과변수에서 지식의 효과크기는 0.21, 수행능력의 효과크기는 0.59, 만족도 영역에서는 0.38로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 몰입형 가상현실 시뮬레이션은 흥미를 높이고 수행능력을 높이는데 효과가 있으며, 시뮬레이션 효과를 측정하기 위해 다양한 변수를 활용한 추후 연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. E. G. Oh. (2020). Perspectives on Nursing Profession for a Post-COVID-19 New Normal. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 32(3), 221-222. DOI : 10.7475/kjan.2020.32.3.221
  2. M. K. Kim. S. H. Kim & W. S. Lee. (2019). Effects of a Virtual Reality Simulation and a Blended Simulation of Care for Pediatric Patient with Asthma. Child Health Nursing Research, 25(4), 496-506. DOI : 10.4094/chnr2019.25.4.496
  3. K. A. Kim & D. W. Choi. (2018). The Effect of Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education : An Application of Care for Acute Heart Disease Patients. Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing, 6(2), 1-13. DOI : 10.17333/JKSSN.2018.6.2.1
  4. P. R. Jeffries. (2005). A Framework for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Simulations used as Teaching Strategies in Nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26(2), 96-103.
  5. Y. J. Kim. W. J. Kim & H. Y. Min. (2020). Nursing Students' Experiences in Virtual Simulation Practice. Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 26(2), 198-207. DOI : 10.5977/jkasne.2020.26.2.198
  6. E. K. Jung. S. S. Choi & J. Y. Jung. (2018). Comparison of Educational Interest, Satisfaction, and Achievements of Educational Virtual Reality and Videos Education before Simulation Training. The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services, 22(2), 93-102. DOI : 10.14408/KJEMS.2018.22.2.093
  7. F. P. Mariana et al. (2018). Comparative Study of a Simulated Incident with Multiple Victims and Immersive Virtual Reality. Nurse Education Today, 71, 48-53. DOI : 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.006
  8. S. J. Smith. S. L. Farra. D. L. Ulrich, E. Hodgson. S & Nicely. A. (2018). Effectiveness of Two Varying Levels of Virtual Reality Simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 39(6), E10-15. DOI : 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000369
  9. M. H. Yoo. J. H. Kim. Y. H. Koo & J. H. Song. (2018). A meta-analysis on effects of VR, AR, MR-based learning k Korea. The Journal of Educational Information and Media. 24(3), 459-488. DOI : 10.15833/KAFEIAM.24.3.459
  10. J. Higgins. D. Altman & S. Green. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions. Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochran-handbook. Org
  11. S. Y. Kim, J. E. Park, Y. J. Lee, H. J. Seo, S. S. Sheen, S. K. Hahn, B. H. Jang & H. J. Son. (2013). Testing a Tool for Assessing the Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies Showed Moderate Reliability and Promising Validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(4), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016
  12. S. D. Hwang. (2015). Meta-analysis using R, Seoul : Hakjisa.
  13. Z. Merchant. E. T. Goetz. L. Cifuentes. W. Keeney-Kennicutt & T. J. Davis. (2014). Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-based Instruction on Students' Learning Outcomes in K-12 and Higher Education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
  14. M. Yoo, J. Kim, Y. Koo & J. H. Song (2018). A meta-analysis on effects of VR, AR, MR-based learning in Korea. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 24(3), 459-488.
  15. A. B Samosorn, G. E. Gilbert, E. B. Bauman, J. Khine & D. MecGonigle. (2019). Teaching airway insertion skills to nursing faculty and students using virtual reality: a pilot study; Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 39, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.10.004
  16. J. S. Hyun, E. J. Kim, J. H. Han & N. H. Kim. (2019). Effects of simulation-based education for emergency patient nursing care in Korea: meta analysis. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 21(1), 1-11. DOI : 10.7586/jkbns.2019.21.1.1
  17. Y. H. So. (2016). The impact of academic achievement by presence and flow-mediated variables in s simulation program based on immersive virtual reality. Journal of Communication Design. 57, 57-68.
  18. G. Makransky, G. B. Petersen & Klingenberg, S. (2020). Can an immersive virtual reality simulation increase students' interest and career aspirations in science?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 1-42.