East Asian mathematical journal

  • 제37권2호
  • /
  • Pages.245-262
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-6973(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-2833(eISSN)
영남수학회 (The Youngnam Mathematical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Elementary Teacher's Journey Through Action Research for Improving Student Responses

  • Noh, Jihwa (Department of Mathematics Education Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.15
  • 심사 : 2021.02.22
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study describes a sixth-grade teacher's professional development journey through action research for improving students' responses in a mathematics class. In the action research, the influence a teacher's questioning tactics would have on students' ability to determine answer reasonability to mathematics problems was investigated. Drawing on qualitative analysis of the teacher's lessons, reflection journal and interviews as well as the classroom students' questionnaires and interviews, this study examines how action research can affect the teacher and the classroom students. The results suggest the popularization of action research among teachers by teacher training and development programs showing the positive changes in the teacher's performance leading to improved student responses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research for English language teachers. A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
  2. Burns, A., & Rochsantiningsih, D. (2006). Conducting action research in indonesia: Illustrations and implications. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 21-35.
  3. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1990). Research Methods in Education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  4. Common Core State Standards Initiative [CCSSM]. (2010). The common core state standards for mathematics. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers.
  5. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  6. Farrell, T. S. C. (2004). Reflective practice in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  7. Fraivillig, J., Murphy, L., & Fuson, K. (1999). Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 148- 170. https://doi.org/10.2307/749608
  8. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C., Dutka, S., & Katzaroff, M. (1996). The relation between student ability and the quality and effectiveness of explanations. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 631-664. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033003631
  9. Goldman, S. (1989). Strategy instruction in mathematics. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 43- 55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510251
  10. Good, T., Slavings, R., Harel, K., & Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: a study of question asking in k-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181-199. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112275
  11. Guskey, T. R (2002). Does it make a difference?: Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.
  12. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1992). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Victoria: Deakin University Press.
  13. Krebs, A. (2005). Analyzing student work as a professional development activity. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18060.x
  14. Marks, D. F. & Yardley, L. (2004). Observation and action research. In Marks, D. F., & Yardley, L. (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 102-121). SAGE Publications, Ltd.
  15. Mills, G. (2007). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
  17. Nicol, C. (1999). Learning to teach mathematics: questioning, listening, and responding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003451423219
  18. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Pape, S., Bell, C., & Yetkin, I. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: a teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026062121857
  20. Peterson, P., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_1
  21. Pine, G. J. (2008). Teacher Action Research: Building Knowledge Democracies. Sage Publications.
  22. Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. New york: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Uysal, H. H. (2012). Evaluation of an In-service training program for primary-school teachers in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n7.4
  24. Young, M. R., Rapp, E., & Murphy, J. W. (2010). Action research: Enhancing classroom practice and fulfilling educational responsibilities. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1), 1-10.