DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Current Status and Challenge of Core Project in Urban Regeneration -Focused on the Type of Central Commercial District-

도시재생사업에서 핵심사업의 추진 현황과 과제 -중심시가지형 사업 추진 사례를 중심으로-

  • Kim, Young-Hwan (Division of Human & Environmental Design, Cheongju University)
  • 김영환 (청주대학교 휴먼환경디자인학부)
  • Received : 2021.01.12
  • Accepted : 2021.02.05
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

In urban regeneration projects, the core projects define the characteristics of the project site and contribute to the highest project cost and drive the project forward. The purpose of this study was to identify the current status and characteristics of the project as a priming project for urban regeneration and to seek desirable alternatives in the future project process. For this purpose, the case of urban regeneration projects in the Chungcheong region was targeted. The results showed that the core projects for each case consisted mainly of projects to develop physical facilities on a relatively large scale. Securing large-scale complex base space and constructing public parking lots are planned as key projects. In addition, based on the cost composition of the priming project, the core project accounted for approximately 80 % of the total project, and the project cost between linked projects does not appear to be relatively well linked in both public and private investment sectors. These findings are expected to help promote substantial urban regeneration projects and enhance efficiency by using them as basic data for urban regeneration projects in the future.

도시재생사업에서 핵심사업은 사업 대상지의 성격을 규정할 뿐 아니라, 사업비가 가장 많이 투입되고 사업 추진을 견인하는 역할을 한다. 본 연구의 목적은 도시재생사업의 마중물 역할로써, 도시재생 핵심사업의 사업추진 현황과 특징을 검토하고, 문제점을 분석하여 향후 원활한 도시재생사업 추진을 위한 방향을 제시하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 연구의 대상은 충청권 지역의 중심시가지형 도시재생사업을 주요 사례로 선정하여 진행하였다. 이에 마중물 사업비를 기준으로 전체 사업비의 약 10% 이상을 차지하는 사업을 도시재생 핵심사업으로 도출하였다. 연구결과, 5개 사례 대상지의 경우 전체 37개 단위사업 중 14개가 핵심사업으로 도출되었다. 해당 사례별 핵심사업은 주로 사업 규모가 큰 물리적 시설 조성 사업 위주로 구성되고 있었는데, 공통적 특징으로 대규모 복합거점공간의 확보와 주차장 조성이 핵심사업을 이루고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 마중물 사업비 기준으로 볼 때, 전체 사업비 대비 핵심사업의 구성비는 약 80% 내외를 차지하였으며, 연계사업간 사업비의 경우 공공투자와 민간투자 부문에서 사례 지역 모두 상대적으로 연계가 미흡한 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. H. Kim, "Design and Management of Complex Anchor Facility in Urban Regeneration - Focused on the Urban Regeneration Project in Chung-buk", Journal of The Korean Cadastre Information Association, Vol.22, No.2, pp.111-123, 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.46416/JKCIA.2020.08.22.2.111
  2. J. J. Kim, D. J. Ryu, "The Public Roles and Implications on Private-invested Projects for Urban Economic Regeneration Projects: Based on the Case Studies of Anchor Projects", The Korea Spatial Planning Review, Vol.86, No.-, pp.89-105, Sept. 2015. DOI: http://dx/doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2015.86..006
  3. K. J. Jung, J. K. Lee, S. S. Lee, "An Empirical Study on Project Type and Funds Supply Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Priority Regions", Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, Vol.28, No.2, pp.19-38, Jun. 2016. https://doi.org/10.22885/KRDA.2016.28.2.19
  4. J. S. Yoo, J. W. Lee, "Visitors' Perceptions, Satisfaction of Urban Regeneration Anchor Tenant: The Case of Jeonju Urban Innovation Center", Journal of the Korea Real Estate Management Review, Vol.20, No.-, pp.319-348, Dec. 2019.
  5. S. E. Park, "A Study on the Efficient Operation Plan through the Diagnosis of the Operation of Urban Regeneration Community Facilities : Focusing on the Busan Community Facilities", Journal of Korea Planning Association, Vol.55, No.3, pp.5-16, Jun. 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2020.06.55.3.5
  6. H. J. Lee, Y. W. Kim, S. H. Lee, "The Analytical Research on Community Centers Used as HUb Spaces of Communities and Their Utilization Status: Focus on the Community Center in Daegu", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol.34, No.9, pp.31-42, Sept. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2018.34.9.31
  7. J. S. Park, "A Study on Urban Regeneration by Community Regeneration: Focussing on Community Regeneration Projects in the U.K", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol.33, No.2, pp.41-51, Feb. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2017.33.2.41
  8. I. Kwon, "A Case Study of Urban Regeneration in Seongseo-dong, Chungju City", Journal of Urban Planners, Vol.5, No.1, pp.17-21, 2018.
  9. Y. S. Hwang, S. K. Kim, K. B. Kim, "A Study on the Problems and Improvements of Incheon City's Urban Renewal New Deal", IDI Urban Research,, Vol.-, No.16, pp.185-208, 2019. DOI: http://doi.org/10.34165/urbanr.2019..16.185
  10. S. Y. Jeon, "Public Role and Support Plan for Urban Regeneration", Planning and Policy, Vol.370, No.8, pp.127-135, 2012.
  11. H. S. Kim, K. S. Kim, C. K. Choi, Y. S. Lee, C. D. Yeo, "New Deal for Urban Regeneration based on Base", Urban Information Service, Vol.-, No..434, pp.4-19, 2018.