Journal of applied mathematics & informatics

한국전산응용수학회 (The Korean Society for Computational and Applied Mathematics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

HIGHER ORDER CLOSE-TO-CONVEX FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH RUSCHEWEYH DERIVATIVE OPERATOR

  • 투고 : 2020.09.05
  • 심사 : 2020.09.23
  • 발행 : 2021.01.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this paper is to introduce and study certain subclasses of analytic functions by using Ruscheweyh derivative operator. We discuss various of interesting properties such as, necessary condition, arc length problem and growth rate of coefficient of newly defined class. Also rate of growth of Hankel determinant will be estimated.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. D.A. Brannan, On functions of bounded boundary rotation, Proc. Edinburg Math. Soc. 16 (1968), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001309150001302X
  2. G.M. Golusin, On distortion theorem and coefficients of univalent functions, Math. Sb. 19 (1946), 183-203.
  3. A.W. Goodman, On close-to-convex functions of higher order, Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest, Eotous Sect. Math. 25 (1972), 17-30.
  4. W.K. Hayman, On the second Hankel determinant of mean univalent functions, Proc. London Math. Soc. 18 (1968), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-18.1.77
  5. W. Janowski, Some extremal problems for certain families of analytic functions, Ann. Polon. Math. 28 (1973), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.4064/ap-28-3-297-326
  6. S. Kanas and A. Wisniowska, Conic domain and starlike functions, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 45 (2000), 647-657.
  7. S. Kanas and A. Wisniowska, Conic regions and k-uniform convexity, J. Comput. Math. 105 (1999), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00018-7
  8. J.W. Noonan and D.K. Thomas, On the Hankel determinant of areally mean p-valent functions, Proc. London Math. Soc. 25 (1972), 503-524.
  9. K.I. Noor, Hankel determinant problem for functions of bounded boundary rotations, Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl. 28 (1983), 731-739.
  10. K.I. Noor, On a generalization of close-to-convexity, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 6 (1983), 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1155/S0161171283000289
  11. K.I. Noor, Some properties of analytic functions with bounded radius rotation, Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 54 (2009), 865-877. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476930902998878
  12. K.I. Noor, On the Hankel determinant of close-to-convex univalent functions, Inter. J. Math. Sci. 3 (1980), 447-481.
  13. K.I. Noor, On the Hankel determinant problem for strongly close-to-convex functions, J. Natu. Geom. 11 (1997), 29-34.
  14. K.I. Noor and M.A. Noor, Higher order close-to-convex functions related with conic domains, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8 (2014), 2455-2463. https://doi.org/10.12785/amis/080541
  15. K.I. Noor, and M.A. Noor, On generalized close-to-convex functions, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 9 (2015), 3147-3152.
  16. K.S. Padmanabhan and R. Parvatham, Properties of a class of functions with bounded boundary rotation, Ann. Polon. Math. 31 (1975), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.4064/ap-31-3-311-323
  17. C. Pommerenke, On starlike and close-to-convex functions, Proc. London Math. Soc. 13 (1963), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-13.1.290
  18. C. Pommerenke, On the coefficients and Hankel determinant of univalent functions, J. London Math. Soc. 41 (1966), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-41.1.111
  19. S. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (1975), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1975-0367176-1