대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제59권1호
  • /
  • Pages.43-54
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 기술을 활용한 전악 고정성 보철 수복 증례

Application of various digital technique on full mouth rehabilitation: A case report

  • 배민수 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 송광엽 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 안승근 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박주미 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이정진 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 서재민 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Bae, Min-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Jae-Min (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Jeonbuk National University, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.07.01
  • 심사 : 2020.11.03
  • 발행 : 2021.01.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

디지털기술의 급격한 발전으로 보철 수복치료에 있어서도 많은 기술들이 활용되고 있다. 특히 최근에는 구강스캐너와 3D printing 기술이 광범위하게 사용되고, 더 나아가 안면스캔 기술 또한 접목되어 활용되고 있다. 본 증례는 37세 여성환자에서 전통적인 방식으로 제작되고 장착되어 충분히 평가된 전악 고정성 임시수복상태를 구강스캐너와 안면스캐너, 3D printing 등의 다양한 디지털 기술을 활용하여 안모와 조화를 이루는 최종보철물로 이행하는 과정을 거쳤다. 이를 통해 안정적인 교합을 회복하고 기능적, 심미적으로 만족할만한 결과를 얻었기에 보고하는 바이다.

Based on rapid improvement in digital fields, many advanced digital technologies are utilized in prosthodontic treatment. Especially, intraoral scanners and 3D printing technology are commonly used, and facial scanning technology is recently being attempted to be part of these digital routines. This case report aims to introduce a digital procedure using the intraoral scanner, facial scanner, and 3D printing technology to create definitive restorations, which are esthetic and harmonious with patient's face. From thoroughly evaluated full-mouth provisional restoration which was manufactured and fitted conventionally, definitive prostheses were fabricated using various digital technique. Stable occlusion with functionally and aesthetically satisfying results were achieved.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park JM, Koak JY, Kwon HB, Kim MJ, Kim SK, Kim SH, Yeo IS, Lim YJ, Han JS, Heo SJ. Implant-supported restoration cases fabricated from digital impression data with the help of intraoral scanner and virtual articulator. Implantology 2017;21:14-23. https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20170002
  2. Sakornwimon N, Leevailoj C. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:386-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.019
  3. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
  4. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
  5. Muallah J, Wesemann C, Nowak R, Robben J, Mah J, Pospiech P, Bumann A. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: an in vitro study using a new method of evaluation. Int J Comput Dent 2017;20:151-64.
  6. Sim JY, Jang Y, Kim WC, Kim HY, Lee DH, Kim JH. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.02.002
  7. Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: From TMJ to smile design. 1st ed. New York; Elsevier; 2007. p. 160-71.
  8. Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:4043-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02840-0
  9. Souza RO, Ozcan M, Pavanelli CA, Buso L, Lombardo GH, Michida SM, Mesquita AM, Bottino MA. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthodont 2012;21:94-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00793.x
  10. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  11. Vaz I, Carracho J. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:223.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.011
  12. Kim SS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, Cho HW. Effect of digital scans on marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:461-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.027
  13. Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardo A, Camps I. Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions. PLoS One 2018;13:e0202916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202916
  14. Brown GB, Currier GF, Kadioglu O, Kierl JP. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154:733-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.009
  15. Jang Y, Sim JY, Park JK, Kim WC, Kim HY, Kim JH. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:135-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.004
  16. Osman RB, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Build Angle: Does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology? Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:182-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5117
  17. Shin SJ, Noh KT, Kwon KR, Kim HS. Use of digital smile design in esthetic restoration in anteri- or teeth: A case report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2017;55:164-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.2.164
  18. Germec-Cakan D, Canter HI, Nur B, Arun T. Comparison of facial soft tissue measurements on three-dimensional images and models obtained with different methods. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1393-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ec6976
  19. Park JM, Oh KC, Shim JS. Integration of intraoral digital scans with a 3D facial scan for anterior tooth rehabilitation. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:394-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.018