DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tributary Activity in Diplomacy Relations between Vietnam and Mainland Southeast Asian Countries from 938 to 1885

  • 투고 : 2021.02.03
  • 심사 : 2021.07.17
  • 발행 : 2021.07.31

초록

Based on research of documents left by Vietnamese feudal dynasties, the current article reports how it initially reconstructed the process of Vietnamese tribute activity of Southeast Asia from the 10th to 19th century and demonstrates the significance of these activities to how Vietnam is considered central rather than peripheral as a nation. Tribute activity took place during a period when Vietnam was an independent country; feudal dynasties of Vietnam were independent and autonomous dynasties. Vietnam had just escaped from the 1,000-year invasion of China and more recently gotten out from the control of the French colonialists. From the demonstration of the tribute activity, otherwise called requesting investiture, the current article places it in relation to the contemporary Chinese "tributary system" to draw out the characteristics and its essence. At the time the current article explores the underlying causes that contributed to shaping the core characteristics of this "tributary system" and its significance to power relationships.

키워드

과제정보

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 601.01-2019.01

참고문헌

  1. Cabinet of the Nguyen Dynasty. 1993. Kham dinh Dai Nam hoi dien su le [Imperially commissioned collected statues and precedents of Dai Nam], Vol. 8, Hue: Thuan Hoa Publishing House.
  2. Cranmer-Byng, J. L. 1973. The Chinese View of Their Place in the World: An Historical Perspective. The China Quarterly, 53: 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741000500034
  3. Di Cosmo N. 2003. Kirghiz Nomads on the Qing Frontier: Tribute, Trade, or Gift-Exchange? Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries, and Human Geographies in Chinese History. Nicola Di Cosmo and Don J. Wyatt, eds. 351-72. London: Curzon Press.
  4. Documents diplomatiques. 1885. Affaires de Chine et du Tonkin 1884-1885. Paris: Imprimerie nationale, M DCCC LXXXV.
  5. Fairbank J. K. 1942. Tributary Trade and China's Relations with the West. The Far Eastern Quarterly, 1(2): 129-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2049617
  6. Fairbank J. K. 1953. Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast: The Opening of the Treaty Ports, 1842-1854, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, esp. chapter 2.
  7. Fairbank J. K., ed. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, Cambridge. Mass.: Harvard University Press, esp. chapter 1.
  8. Fairbank J. K. and S. Y. Teng. 1941. On the Ch'ing Tributary System. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6(2): 135-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/2718006
  9. Fitzgerald, C. P. 1964. The Chinese View of Their Place in the World. London: Oxford University Press.
  10. Goodby, James E. 2014. The Survival Strategies of Small Nations. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 56(5): 31-39.
  11. John E. Wills, Jr. 1988. Tribute, Defensiveness, and Dependency: Uses and Limits of Some Basic Ideas About Mid-Qing Dynasty Foreign Relations. American Neptune, 48: 225-229.
  12. Joseph F. Fletcher. 1968. China and Central Asia, 1368-1884. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations. J. K. Fairbank, ed. 206-224. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  13. Le Quy Don. 1978. Dai Viet thong su [Annals of Dai Viet], Vol. 2. Hanoi: Social Science Publishing House.
  14. Le Quy Don. 2018. Bac su thong luc [Complete history of the North], Hanoi National Universiy of Education Publishing house, Hanoi.
  15. Morris Rossabi, ed. 1983. China among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th-14th Centuries, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  16. Michael H. Hunt. 1984. Chinese Foreign Relations in Historical Perspective. China's Foreign Relations in the 1980s. Harry Harding, ed. 1-42. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  17. Millward, James A. 1998. Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759-1864. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  18. Ngo Si Lien et al. 1993a. Dai Viet su ky toan thu [Complete annals of Dai Viet], translated by Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Vol. 1. Hanoi: Social Science Publishing House.
  19. Ngo Si Lien et al. 1993b. Dai Viet su ky toan thu [Complete annals of Dai Viet], translated by Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Vol. 2. Hanoi: Social Science Publishing House.
  20. Ngo Si Lien et al. 1993c. Dai Viet su ky toan thu [Complete annals of Dai Viet], translated by Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Vol. 3. Hanoi: Social Science Publishing House.
  21. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office.1998. Kham dinh Viet su thong giam cuong muc [The Imperially Ordered Annotated Text Completely Reflecting the History of Viet], Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  22. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 1998. Kham dinh Viet su thong giam cuong muc [The Imperially Ordered Annotated Text Completely Reflecting the History of Viet]. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  23. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2002. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. I. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  24. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2004. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. II. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  25. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2007a. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. III. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  26. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2007b. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. IV. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  27. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2007c. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. V. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  28. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2007d. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. VI. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  29. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2007e. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. VII. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  30. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2007f. Dai Nam thuc luc [True records of Dai Nam], Vol. VIII. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
  31. Nguyen Dynasty's National Historian Office. 2009. Minh Menh chinh yeu [MinhMenh's principal policies], translated by Translation Committee of Vietnamese Historical Documents, Vol. 3. Hue: Thuan Hoa Publishing House.
  32. Nguyen Thi My Hanh. 2019. Application of Center-Periphery Theory to the Study of Vietnam-China Relations in the Middle Ages. Southeast Asian Studies, 8(1): 53-79.
  33. Phan Huy Chu. 2007. Lich trieu hien chuong loai chi [Records on administrative systems of successive dynasties], translated by Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Educational Publishing House.
  34. Pham Van Son.1960. Viet su toan thu [The Complete annals of the Histoty of Viet], Sai Gon publishing house.
  35. Shils, E. 1961. Centre and periphery. The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyo. 117-130. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  36. Shils, E. 1975. Center and periphery: Essays in macro sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  37. Winthrop, R H. 1991. Dictionary of Concepts in Cultural Anthropology. New York: Greenwood Press.
  38. Womack, B. 2004. Asymmetry theory and China's concept of multipolarity. Journal of Contemporary China, 13(39): 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067056042000211942
  39. Womack, B. 2012. Asymmetry and China's Tributary System. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5(1): 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pos003
  40. Yoshiharu, Tsuboi. 1992. Nuoc Dai Nam doi dien voi Phap va Trung Hoa 1847-1885 [Dai Nam faces with France and China from 1847 to 1885]. Hanoi: Vietnam History Association.
  41. Yu, Insun. 2009. Vietnam-China Relations in the 19th Century: Myth and Reality of the Tributary System. Journal of Northeast Asian History, 6(1): 81-117.
  42. Zhang, F. 2009. Rethinking the 'Tribute System': Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2: 545-574. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop010