과제정보
三人の査読者の方々のコメントに感謝いたします。
참고문헌
- 衛藤幹子. (2017). 政治学の批判的構想:ジェンダーからの接近. 法政大学出版会.
- 大海篤子. (2007). 女性議員の有効性に関する一考察-女性議員研究の現状と展望から見えたもの. 川人貞史, 山元一編, 政治参画とジェンダー. 東北大学出版会, 211-243.
- 大山礼子. (2018). 政治を再建する,いくつかの方法. 日本経済新聞出版会.
- 大山七穂. (2016). 女性議員と男性議員は何が違うのか. 三浦まり編著, 日本の女性議員:どうすれば増えるのか. 朝日新聞出版, 217-270.
- 竹安栄子. (2016). 地方の女性議員たち, 三浦まり編著, 日本の女性議員: どうすれば増えるのか. 朝日新聞出版, 271-315.
- 田畑真一. (2017). 代表関係の複数性:代表論における構築主義的転回の意義. 年報政治学, I, 181-202.
- 辻由希. (2010). ジェンダーと代表/表象(representation)-「月刊自由民主」と衆議院選挙公報にみる女性の政治的代表. 年報政治学, 61(2): 127-150.
- 辻由希. (2015). 第二次安倍内閣における女性活躍推進政策. 季刊家計経済研究, 107: 17-25.
- 堀江考司. (2016a). 労働供給と家族主義の間-安倍政権の女性政策における経済の論理と家族の論理. 人文学報, 32: 23-48.
- 堀江孝司. (2016b). 成長戦略としての「女性」-安倍政権の女性政策を読み解く. SYNODOS. https://synodos.jp/politics/17400
- 堀江考司. (2017). 安倍政権の女性政策. 大原社会問題研究所雑誌, 700: 38-44.
- 三浦まり. (2014). 女性「活躍」推進の罠:女性が「輝かされる」社会に抗して. 世界, 862: 52-58.
- 三浦まり. (2015). 新自由主義的母性-「女性の活躍」政策の矛盾. ジェンダー研究, 18: 53-68.
- 皆川満寿美. (2016). 女性活躍推進法の成立-「成長戦略」から「ポジティブ・アクション」へ. 国際ジェンダー学会誌, 14: 8-31.
- 武蔵勝宏. (2020). 与党による閣法事前審査制の見直しに関する考察. 同志社政策科学研究. 21(2): 157-170.
- Celis, K. (2006). Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women's Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1990-1979). Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(2): 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n02_04
- Celis, K. (2009). Substantive Representation of women (and improving it): What it is and should be About? Comparative European Politics 7:95-113. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.35
- Celis, K. (2012). On Substantive Representation, Diversity, and Responsiveness. Politics & Gender, 8(4): 524-529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X12000542
- Celis, K. (2013). Representatives in Times of Diversity: The Political Representation of Women. Women's Studies International Forum 41: 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.007
- Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2012). The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims? Political Studies, 60(1): 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00904.x
- Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2014). Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation. Colchester, United Kingdom: ECPR Press.
- Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2018a). Conservatism and Women's Political Representation. Politics & Gender, 14(1): 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000575
- Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2018b). Good Representatives and Good Representation. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(2): 314-317. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096517002426
- Celis, K. and Childs, S. (2020). Feminist Democratic Representation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., and Krook, M. L. (2014). Constituting Women's Interests through Representative Claims. Politics & Gender, 10(2): 149-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000026
- Celis, K. and Erzeel, S. (2015). Beyond the Usual Suspects: Non-Left, Male and Non-Feminist MPs and the Substantive Representation of Women. Government and Opposition, 50(1): 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.42
- Childs, S. and Webb, P. (2012). Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Childs, S., Webb, P., and Marthaler, S. (2010). Constituting and Substantively Representing Women: Applying New Approaches to a UK Case Study. Politics & Gender, 6(2): 199-223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000048
- Curtin, J. (2014). Conservative Women and Executive Office in Australia and New Zealand. In K. Celis and S. Childs, Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation. Colchester, United Kingdom: ECPR Press, 141-160.
- Dalton, E. (2017). Womenomics, 'Equality' and Abe's Neo-liberal Strategy to Make Japanese Women Shine. Social Science Japan Journal, 20(1): 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1093/ssjj/jyw043
- Diaz, M. M. (2005). Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. Colchester, United Kingdom: ECPR Press.
- Erzeel, S. and Celis, K. (2016). Political Parties, Ideology and the Substantive Representation of Women. Party Politics, 22(5): 576-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816655561
- Franceschet, S. (2011). Gendered Institutions and Women's Substantive Representation: Female legislators in Argentina and Chile. In M. L. Krook and F. Mackay (Eds.), Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 58-78.
- Franceschet, S. and Piscopo, J. M. (2008). Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender, 4(3): 393-425.
- Gwiazda, A. (2019). The Substantive Representation of Women in Poland. Politics & Gender, 15(2): 262-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000909
- Kantola, J. and Saari, M. (2014). Conservative Women MPs' Construction of Gender Equality in Finland. In K. Celis and S. Childs, Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation. Colchester, United Kingdom: ECPR Press, 183-208.
- Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent 'Yes,' The Journal of Politics, 61(3): 628-657. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821
- O'Brien, D. Z. (2018). Righting' Conventional Wisdom: Women and Right Parties in Established Democracies. Politics & Gender, 14(1): 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000514
- Osawa, K. and Yoon, J. (2019). Who represents women and why in the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 25(3): 437-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2019.1648742
- Osborn, T. L. (2012). How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender, and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Phillips, A. (1998). The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Piscopo, J. M. (2011). Rethinking Descriptive Representation: Rendering Women in Legislative Debates. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(3): 448-472. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq061
- Piscopo, J. M. (2014). Feminist Proposals and Conservative Voices: The Substantive Representation of Women in Argentina. In K. Celis and S. Childs, Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation. Colchester, United Kingdom: ECPR Press, 209-230.
- Plumb, A. (2016). The Substantive Representation of Women on 'Morality Politics' Issues in Australia and the UK: How Does the Substantive Representation of Women Occur in Conservative Parties? Political Science, 68(1): 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318716647208
- Reingold, B. and Swers, M. (2011). An Endogenous Approach to Women's Interests: When Interests Are Interesting in and of Themselves. Politics & Gender, 7(3): 429-435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000201
- Swers, M. L. (2002). The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Yoon, J. and Osawa, K. (2017). Advocating Policy Interests in Local Politics: Women's Substantive Representation in Japan and South Korea. Asian Women, 33(2): 43-67. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2017.06.33.2.43
- Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.