DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of a pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) cannery by-product on growth performance and carcass characteristics in finishing Hanwoo steers

  • Choi, Yongjun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Sangrak (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Na, Youngjun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2020.04.14
  • Accepted : 2020.06.26
  • Published : 2021.02.01

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pineapple cannery by-product (PCB) level on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing Hanwoo steers. Methods: The feeding stage was divided into early and late finishing stages. A total of 60 castrated Hanwoo steers (13.9±0.8 months old, 418.8±36.5 kg initial body weight [BW]) were blocked by initial BW and then randomly allotted into 12 pens (five head/pen). The pens were randomly assigned to control (CONT), low PCB (LPCB), or high PCB (HPCB) treatments. These diets contained 0%, 1.5%, or 3.0% of PCB (on a dry matter [DM] basis; as-fed basis was 0%, 10.6%, or 21.2%), respectively. Results: For the early finishing stage, body weight gain (BWG) and average daily gain (ADG) of the CONT and LPCB feeding groups were greater (p<0.05) than those of the HPCB feeding group. In addition, there were linear and quadratic effects on BWG and ADG with increasing dietary PCB level (p<0.05). The gain to feed (G:F) ratio tends to quadratically decrease with an increasing PCB level in the early finishing stage (p = 0.076). Growth performances of late finishing stage were not affected by PCB level. The marbling score of the LPCB feeding group was similar to that of the CONT feeding group. However, there was a linear decrease (p< 0.05) in marbling score and quality grade among treatments as PCB was increased in the diet. In the longissimus muscle free amino acid profile, histidine composition increased linearly (p<0.05) with an increasing level of PCB. Conclusion: The level of PCB 1.5% DM in diet can be used for finishing steers without any adverse effects on growth and carcass performances. However, there were some negative effects on growth and carcass performance in the HPCB feeding group.

Keywords

References

  1. Muller ZO. Feeding potential of pineapple waste for cattle. World Anim Rev 1978;25:25-9.
  2. Gowda NKS, Vallesha NC, Awachat VB, Anandan S, Pal DT, Prasad CS. Study on evaluation of silage from pineapple (Ananas comosus) fruit residue as livestock feed. Trop Anim Health Prod 2015;47:557-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0762-2
  3. Tran AV. Chemical analysis and pulping study of pineapple crown leaves. Ind Crops Prod 2006;24:66-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.03.003
  4. Sruamsiri S. Agricultural wastes as dairy feed in Chiang Mai. Anim Sci J 2007;78:335-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00445.x
  5. Prado IN, Lallo FH, Zeoula LM, Caldas Neto SF, Nascimento WG, Marques J A. Bulls performance in feedlot with levels of substituting corn silage by pineapple by-products silage. Rev Bras Zootec 2003;32:737-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982003000300026
  6. Park SJ, Beak S-H, Jung DJS, et al. Genetic, management, and nutritional factors affecting intramuscular fat deposition in beef cattle - a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:1043-61. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0310
  7. Rural Development Administration National Institute of Animal Science. Korean feeding standard for Hanwoo. Suwon, Korea: Rural Development Administration National Institute of Animal Science; 2012.
  8. Horwitz W, Latimer GW. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Washington, DC, USA: AOAC International; 2005.
  9. Mertens DR. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2002;85:1217-40.
  10. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  11. Animal Products Grading Service. Report of business for animal products grading. Sejong, Korea: Korea Institute for Animal Productions Quality Evaluation; 1995.
  12. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957;226:497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5
  13. Lepage G, Roy CC. Direct transesterification of all classes of lipids in a one-step reaction. J Lipid Res 1986;27:114-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2275(20)38861-1
  14. Garces R, Mancha M. One-step lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl esters preparation from fresh plant tissues. Anal Biochem 1993;211:139-43. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1993.1244
  15. Henderson JW, Ricker RD, Bidlingmeyer BA, Woodward C. Rapid, accurate, sensitive, and reproducible HPLC analysis of amino acids. Santa Clara, CA, USA: Agilent Technologies; 2000. pp. 1-10.
  16. SAS Institute Inc. Base SAS 9.4 procedures guide. 5th ed. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc; 2015.
  17. Lewis D. Blood-urea concentration in relation to protein utilization in the ruminant. J Agric Sci 1957;48:438-46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600032962
  18. Owens FN, Bergen WG. Nitrogen metabolism of ruminant animals: historical perspective, current understanding and future implications. J Anim Sci 1983;57(Suppl 2):498-518. https://doi.org/10.2527/animalsci1983.57Supplement_2498x
  19. Preston RL, Byers F, Stevens KR. Estrogenic activity and growth stimulation in steers fed varying protein levels. J Anim Sci 1978;46:541-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.462541x
  20. Hof G, Vervoorn MD, Lenaers PJ, Tamminga S. Milk urea nitrogen as a tool to monitor the protein nutrition of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:3333-40. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76309-4
  21. Hammond AC. Update on BUN and MUN as a guide for protein supplementation in cattle. In: Proceedings of the Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium. Gainesville, FL, USA: University of Florida; 1997. pp. 43-52.
  22. Chittenden RH, Joslin EP, Meara FS. On the ferments contained in the juice of the pineapple, ananassa sativa, together with some observations on the composition and proteolytic action of the juice. London, MD, USA: Forgotten Books; 2018.
  23. Lee TT, Chiou WS, Hsu JC, Yu B. Evaluation of protease digestion on various feed proteins by chemical assay. (2) Effects on distribution of polypeptide pattern of hydrolyzed feed proteins. J Chin Soc Anim Sci 2000;29:21-8.
  24. Thornton RF. Factors affecting the urinary excretion of urea nitrogen in cattle. II. The plasma urea nitrogen concentration. Aust J Agric Res 1970;21:145-52. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9700145
  25. Hennessy DW, Nolan JV. Nitrogen kinetics in cattle fed a mature subtropical grass hay with and without protein meal supplementation. Aust J Agric Res 1988;39:1135-50. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9881135
  26. Elrod CC, Van Amburgh M, Butler WR. Alterations of pH in response to increased dietary protein in cattle are unique to the uterus. J Anim Sci 1993;71:702-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.713702x
  27. Elrod CC, Butler WR. Reduction of fertility and alteration of uterine pH in heifers fed excess ruminally degradable protein. J Anim Sci 1993;71:694-701. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.713694x
  28. Ferguson JD, Galligan DT, Blanchard T, Reeves M. Serum urea nitrogen and conception rate: the usefulness of test information. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:3742-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77716-4
  29. Aurousseau B, Bauchart D, Calichon E, Micol D, Priolo A. Effect of grass or concentrate feeding systems and rate of growth on triglyceride and phospholipid and their fatty acids in the M. longissimus thoracis of lambs. Meat Sci 2004;66: 531-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00156-6
  30. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle: eighth revised edition. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2016.
  31. Ferreira ACH, Neiva JNM, Rodriguez NM, Campos WE, Borges I. Nutritional evaluation of pineapple industry by-product as additive on elephant grass silage. Rev Bras Zootec 2009;38:223-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000200002
  32. de Carvalho Correia MX, Costa RG, da Silva JHV, de Carvalho FFR, de Medeiros AN. Use of dehydrated pineapple by-product in diets for growing goats: digestibility and performance. Rev Bras Zootec 2006;35:1822-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982006000600033
  33. Costa RG, Correia MXC, Da Silva JHV, De Medeiros AN, De Carvalho FFR. Effect of different levels of dehydrated pineapple by-products on intake, digestibility and performance of growing goats. Small Rumin Res 2007;71:138-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.05.012
  34. Shamsudin R, Daud WRW, Takriff MS, Hassan O. Physicochemical properties of the josapine variety of pineapple fruit. Int J Food Eng 2007;3:9. https://doi.org/10.2202/1556-3758.1115
  35. Rustomo B, AlZahal O, Odongo NE, Duffield TF, McBride BW. Effects of rumen acid load from feed and forage particle size on ruminal pH and dry matter intake in the lactating dairy cow. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:4758-68. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72525-5
  36. Yamazaki T. Effects of age and fatness on the meat quality and quantity of beef cattle. 1. The growth of various organs and tissues of Japanese Black breed steers. Hiroshima, Japan: Bulletin of the Chugoku National Agricultural Experiment Station; 1977.
  37. San Gabriel A, Uneyama H. Amino acid sensing in the gastrointestinal tract. Animo Acids 2013;45:451-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-012-1371-2
  38. Erickson MC, Hultin HO. Influence of histidine on lipid peroxidation in sarcoplasmic reticulum. Arch Biochem Biophys 1992;292:427-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(92)90012-L
  39. Hipkiss AR, Gaunitz F. Inhibition of tumour cell growth by carnosine: some possible mechanisms. Animo Acids 2014;46:327-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-013-1627-5

Cited by

  1. Determination of in situ degradation parameters and feeding level of pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) cannery by-product to Hanwoo steers vol.34, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0083
  2. The Effects of Using Pineapple Stem Starch as an Alternative Starch Source and Ageing Period on Meat Quality, Texture Profile, Ribonucleotide Content, and Fatty Acid Composition of Longissimus Thoraci vol.10, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102319