DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preliminary Study on Rapid Measurement of Gross Alpha/Beta and 90Sr Activities in Surface Soil by Mobile ZnS(Ag)/PTV Array and Handheld PVT Rod with Gated Energy Channels

  • Lee, Chanki (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Hee Reyoung (Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2021.04.20
  • Accepted : 2021.07.09
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Background: Surface soil radiation monitoring around nuclear facilities is important to classify and characterize the contaminated areas. A scanning and direct measurement technique can survey the sites rapidly before starting sampling analysis. Materials and Methods: Regarding this, we test and suggest a measurement technique for gross alpha/beta and 90Sr activities in surface soil based on a mobile ZnS(Ag)/PVT (polyvinyltoluene) array and a handheld PVT rod, respectively. To detect 90Sr selectively in soil mixed with naturally occurring radioactive materials, chosen energy channel counts from the multichannel analyzers were used instead of whole channel counts. Soil samples contaminated with exempt liquid 90Sr with 1 Bq·g-1, 3 Bq·g-1, and 10 Bq·g-1 were prepared and hardened by flocculation. Results and Discussion: The mobile ZnS(Ag)/PVT array could discriminate gross alpha, gross beta, and gamma radiation by the different pulse-shaped signal features of each sensor material. If the array is deployed on a vehicle, the scan minimum detectable concentration (MDC) range will be about 0.11-0.17 Bq·g-1 at 18 km·h-1 speed, highly sensitive to actual sites. The handheld PVT rod with 12 mm (Φ) × 20 mm (H) size can directly measure 90Sr selectively if channels on which energies are from 1,470 and 2,279 keV are gated, minimizing crossdetection of other radionuclides. These methods were verified by measuring soil samples fabricated with homogeneous 90Sr concentrations, showing static MDC of 2.16 Bq·g-1 at a measurement time of 300 seconds. Conclusion: Based on the results, comprehensive procedures using these detectors are suggested to optimize soil sites survey.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (No. NRF-2018-Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program).

References

  1. Sahoo SK, Kavasi N, Sorimachi A, Arae H, Tokonami S, Mietelski JW, et al. Strontium-90 activity concentration in soil samples from the exclusion zone of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23925. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23925
  2. Kashparov VA, Lundin SM, Khomutinin YV, Kaminsky SP, Levchuk SE, Protsak VP, et al. Soil contamination with 90Sr in the near zone of the Chernobyl accident. J Environ Radioact. 2001;56(3):285-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(00)00207-1
  3. Le Roux G, Duffa C, Vray F, Renaud P. Deposition of artificial radionuclides from atmospheric Nuclear Weapon Tests estimated by soil inventories in French areas low-impacted by Chernobyl. J Environ Radioact. 2010;101(3):211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.10.010
  4. Kabdyrakova AM, Lukashenko SN, Mendubaev AT, Kunduzbayeva AY, Panitskiy AV, Larionova NV. Distribution of artificial radionuclides in particle-size fractions of soil on fallout plumes of nuclear explosions. J Environ Radioact. 2018;186:45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.09.022
  5. Knoll GF. Radiation detection and measurement. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
  6. International Atomic Energy Agency. Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM IV): proceedings of an international conference held in Szczyrk, Poland, 17-21 May 2004. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2005.
  7. Hartnell J; SNO+ Collaboration. Neutrinoless double beta decay with SNO+. J Phys Conf Ser. 2012;375(4):042015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/375/1/042015
  8. Matsuda N, Mikami S, Shimoura S, Takahashi J, Nakano M, Shimada K, et al. Depth profiles of radioactive cesium in soil using a scraper plate over a wide area surrounding the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear PowerPlant, Japan. J Environ Radioact. 2015;139:427-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.10.001
  9. Nishizawa Y, Yoshida M, Sanada Y, Torii T. Distribution of the 134Cs/137Cs ratio around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant using an unmanned helicopter radiation monitoring system. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53(4):468-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1071721
  10. Shikaze Y, Nishizawa Y, Sanada Y, Torii T, Jiang J, Shimazoe K, et al. Field test around Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant site using improved Ce:Gd3(Al,Ga)5O12 scintillator Compton camera mounted on an unmanned helicopter. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53(12):1907-1918. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2016.1185980
  11. Almgren S, Isaksson M. Vertical migration studies of 137Cs from nuclear weapons fallout and the Chernobyl accident. J Environ Radioact. 2006;91(1-2):90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.08.008
  12. Lee C, Park SW, Kim HR. Development of mobile scanning system for effective in-situ spatial prediction of radioactive contamination at decommissioning sites. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2020;966:163833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.163833
  13. Bae JW, Kim HR. Plastic scintillator beta ray scanner for in-situ discrimination of beta ray and gamma ray radioactivity in soil. Nucl Eng Technol. 2020;52(6):1259-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.013
  14. Byon J, Park S, Ahn S. Derivation of preliminary derived concentration guideline levels for surface soil at Kori Unit 1 by RESRAD probabilistic analysis. Nucl Eng Technol. 2018:50(8):1289-1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.07.018
  15. Kalb PD, Luckett L, Watters D, Gogolak C, Milian L. Deployment of in situ measurement techniques and the MARSSIM process for characterization of the Brookhaven Graphite Research Reactor. Proceedings of Waste Management 2000 Conference; 2000 Feb 27-Mar 2; Tucson, AZ.
  16. Mann B. Plum Brook Reactor Facility: Final status survey report, attachment 6: Waste handling building (building 1133) [Internet]. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2010 [cited 2021 Oct 28]. Available from: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1030/ML103060328.pdf.
  17. Abelquist EW. Decommissioning health physics: a handbook for MARSSIM users. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001.
  18. US Environmental Protection Agency. Multi-agency radiation survey and site investigation manual (MARSSIM). Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2000.
  19. Kumar A, Singhal RK, Preetha J, Rupali K, Narayanan U, Suresh S, et al. Impact of tropical ecosystem on the migrational behavior of K-40, Cs-137, Th-232 U-238 in perennial plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008;192(1):293-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9656-5
  20. Lee B, Kim Y, L'yi W, Kim J, Seo B, Hong S. Radiological analysis for radioactivity depth distribution in activated concrete using gamma-ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot. 2021;169:109558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109558
  21. Keyser RM. Deconvolution of gamma-ray peak doublets as a function of peak separation and relative amplitude. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 1990;286(3):403-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(90)90887-C
  22. Koskelo MJ, Mercier MT. Verification of gamma spectroscopy programs: a standardized approach. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 1990;299(1-3):318-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(90)90799-C
  23. Mitchell DJ, Brusseau C. Neutron counting and gamma spectroscopy with PVT detectors (Sandia Report SAND2011-4361). Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, Sandia National Laboratories; 2011.
  24. Los Alamos National Laboratory. MCNP6 users manual: code version 6.1 (LA-CP-13-00634). Los Alamos, CA: Los Alamos National Laboratory; 2013.
  25. Vajda N, Kim CK. Determination of radiostrontium isotopes: a review of analytical methodology. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010;68(12):2306-2326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.05.013