Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

The Korean Association for Radiation Protection (대한방사선방어학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Dose Rates from Four Surveys around the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant for Location Factor Evaluation

  • Received : 2021.04.19
  • Accepted : 2021.07.21
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The radionuclides released by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident 9 years ago are still being monitored by various research teams and the Japanese government. Comparison of different surveys' results could help evaluate the exposure doses and the mechanism of radiocesium behavior in the urban environment in the area. In this study, we clarified the relationship between land use and temporal changes in the ambient dose rates (air dose rates) using big data. Materials and Methods: We set a series of 1 × 1 km2 meshes within the 80 km zone of the FDNPP to compare the different survey results. We then prepared an analysis dataset from all survey meshes to analyze the temporal change in the air dose rate. The selected meshes included data from all survey types (airborne, fixed point, backpack, and carborne) obtained through the all-time survey campaigns. Results and Discussion: The characteristics of each survey's results were then evaluated using this dataset, as they depended on the measurement object. The dataset analysis revealed that, for example, the results of the carborne survey were smaller than those of the other surveys because the field of view of the carborne survey was limited to paved roads. The location factor of different land uses was also evaluated considering the characteristics of the four survey methods. Nine years after the FDNPP accident, the location factor ranged from 0.26 to 0.49, while the half-life of the air dose rate ranged from 1.2 to 1.6. Conclusion: We found that the decreasing trend in the air dose rate of the FDNPP accident was similar to the results obtained after the Chernobyl accident. These parameters will be useful for the prediction of the future exposure dose at the post-accident.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was performed as part of the mapping project and the airborne survey project funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) and the NRA, Japan.

References

  1. Sanada Y, Urabe Y, Sasaki M, Ochi K, Torii T. Evaluation of ecological half-life of dose rate based on airborne radiation monitoring following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident. J Environ Radioact. 2018;192:417-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.07.016
  2. Andoh M, Mikami S, Tsuda S, Yoshida T, Matsuda N, Saito K. Decreasing trend of ambient dose equivalent rates over a wide area in eastern Japan until 2016 evaluated by car-borne surveys using KURAMA systems. J Environ Radioact. 2019;210:105813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.09.011
  3. Mikami S, Tanaka H, Matsuda H, Sato S, Hoshide Y, Okuda N, et al. The deposition densities of radiocesium and the air dose rates in undisturbed fields around the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant; their temporal changes for five years after the accident. J Environ Radioact. 2019;210:105941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.03.017
  4. Saito K, Mikami S, Andoh M, Matsuda N, Kinase S, Tsuda S, et al. Summary of temporal changes in air dose rates and radionuclide deposition densities in the 80 km zone over five years after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident. J Environ Radioact. 2019;210:105878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.12.020
  5. Yoshimura K, Saegusa J, Sanada Y. Initial decrease in the ambient dose equivalent rate after the Fukushima accident and its difference from Chernobyl. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3859. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60847-0
  6. Golikov VY, Balonov MI, Jacob P. External exposure of the population living in areas of Russia contaminated due to the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2002;41(3):185-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-002-0167-2
  7. Nuclear Regulatory Authority. Monitoring information of environmental radioactivity level [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Nuclear Regulatory Authority; c2021 [cited 2021 Dec 1]. Available from: https://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/en/.
  8. Sanada Y, Sugita T, Nishizawa Y, Kondo A, Torii T. The aerial radiation monitoring in Japan after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. Prog Nucl Sci Technol. 2014;4(7):76-80.
  9. Futemma A, Sanada Y, Ishizaki A, Komiya T, Shimada K, Mori A, et al. Radiation monitoring using manned helicopter around the Nuclear Power Station in the fiscal year 2018 (Contract research) (No. JAEA-TECHNOLOGY-2019-016). Tokaimura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2019.
  10. Nuclear Regulatory Authority. Results of airborne monitoring in Fukushima Prefecture and neighboring prefectures and the Fourteenth Airborne Monitoring in the 80km zone from the Fukushima Daiichi NPP [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Nuclear Regulatory Authority; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 1]. Available from: https://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/en/contents/14000/13990/24/14th_Airborne_eng.pdf.
  11. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. Maps & Geospatial Information [Internet]. Tsukuba, Japan: Geospatial Information Authority of Japan; 2015 [cited 2021 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.gsi.go.jp/ENGLISH/page_e30031.html.
  12. Andoh M, Yamamoto H, Kanno T, Saito K. Measurement of ambient dose equivalent rates by walk survey around Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant using KURAMA-II until 2016. J Environ Radioact. 2019;210:105812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.09.010
  13. Tsuda S, Yoshida T, Tsutsumi M, Saito K. Characteristics and verification of a car-borne survey system for dose rates in air: KURAMA-II. J Environ Radioact. 2015;139:260-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.02.028
  14. Sanada Y, Yoshimura K, Urabe Y, Iwai T, Katengeza EW. Distribution map of natural gamma-ray dose rates for studies of the additional exposure dose after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station accident. J Environ Radioact. 2020;223-224:106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106397
  15. Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Database for radioactive substance monitoring data [Internet]. Tokaimura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 1]. Available from: https://emdb.jaea.go.jp/emdb.
  16. Tyler AN, Sanderson DC, Scott EM, Allyson JD. Accounting for spatial variability and fields of view in environmental gamma ray spectrometry. J Environ Radioact. 1996;33(3):213-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(95)00097-T
  17. Andersson KG, Roed J, Fogh CL. Weathering of radiocaesium contamination on urban streets, walls and roofs. J Environ Radioact. 2002;62(1):49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(01)00150-3
  18. Yoshimura K, Saito K, Fujiwara K. Distribution of 137Cs on components in urban area four years after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. J Environ Radioact. 2017;178-179:48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.07.021
  19. Onda Y, Taniguchi K, Yoshimura K, Kato H, Takahashi J, Wakiyama Y, et al. Radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in terrestrial systems. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2020;1(12):644-660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0099-x