Acknowledgement
This study was partially supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant (25463038), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7112060) and A Grant for High-level Talents of Beijing Health Organization (20113075).
References
- Muller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, Vazquez L, Herrmann FR, Schimmel M. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in very old adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res 2013;92:154S-60S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513509630
- Ellis JS, Levine A, Bedos C, Mojon P, Rosberger Z, Feine J, Thomason JM. Refusal of implant supported mandibular overdentures by elderly patients. Gerodontology 2011;28:62-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00348.x
- Marcello-Machado RM, Faot F, Schuster AJ, Nascimento GG, Del Bel Cury AA. Mini-implants and narrow diameter implants as mandibular overdenture retainers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Oral Rehabil 2018;45: 161-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12585
- Papadimitriou DE, Friedland B, Gannam C, Salari S, Gallucci GO. Narrow-diameter versus standard-diameter implants and their effect on the need for guided bone regeneration: a virtual three-dimensional study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1127-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12224
- Ribeiro AB, Della Vecchia MP, Cunha TR, Sorgini DB, Dos Reis AC, Muglia VA, de Albuquerque RF Jr, de Souza RF. Short-term post-operative pain and discomfort following insertion of mini-implants for retaining mandibular overdentures: a randomized controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:605-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12287
- Jawad S, Barclay C, Whittaker W, Tickle M, Walsh T. A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0333-1
- Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:486-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01132.x
- Monje A, Chappuis V, Monje F, Munoz F, Wang HL, Urban IA, Buser D. The critical peri-implant buccal bone wall thickness revisited: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34:1328-36. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7657
- Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Heydecke G, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais JA, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002;19:3-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00003.x
- Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Muller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009;207:185-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728
- Preoteasa E, Imre M, Preoteasa CT. A 3-year follow-up study of overdentures retained by mini-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:1170-6. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3222
- Kanazawa M, Feine J, Esfandiari S. Clinical guidelines and procedures for provision of mandibular overdentures on 4 mini-dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117:22-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.020
- Aunmeungtong W, Kumchai T, Strietzel FP, Reichart PA, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative clinical study of conventional dental implants and mini dental implants for mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19:328-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12461
- Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Success rates of microimplants in edentulous patients with residual ridge resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:270-6.
- Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
- Qian J, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Reasons for marginal bone loss around oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:792-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12014
- Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2012;91:242-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431252
- Saaby M, Karring E, Schou S, Isidor F. Factors influencing severity of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.6_12958
- Spies BC, Bateli M, Ben Rahal G, Christmann M, Vach K, Kohal RJ. Does oral implant design affect marginal bone loss? Results of a parallel-group randomized controlled equivalence trial. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018:8436437. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8436437
- Mundt T, Schwahn C, Biffar R, Heinemann F. Changes in bone levels around mini-implants in edentulous arches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:1149-55. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4012
- Ozgur GO, Kazancioglu HO, Demirtas N, Deger S, Ak G. Risk factors associated with implant marginal bone loss: a retrospective 6-year follow-up study. Implant Dent 2016;25:122-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000366
- Saravi BE, Putz M, Patzelt S, Alkalak A, Uelkuemen S, Boeker M. Marginal bone loss around oral implants supporting fixed versus removable prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent 2020;6:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00217-7
- Jawad S, Clarke PT. Survival of mini dental implants used to retain mandibular complete overdentures: systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 34:343-56. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6991
- Galindo-Moreno P, Leon-Cano A, Ortega-Oller I, Monje A, O Valle F, Catena A. Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: beyond 2 mm. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:e28-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12324
- Linetskiy I, Demenko V, Linetska L, Yefremov O. Impact of annual bone loss and different bone quality on dental implant success - a finite element study. Comput Biol Med 2017;91:318-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.016
- Leitao-Almeida B, Camps-Font O, Correia A, Mir-Mari J, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implantoplasty on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants with marginal bone loss: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01323-z
- Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:8-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01360.x
- Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322-33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.3.322
- Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 1975;8:393-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5
- Yoon KH, Kim SG, Lee JH, Suh SW. 3D finite element analysis of changes in stress levels and distributions for an osseointegrated implant after vertical bone loss. Implant Dent 2011;20:354-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318226294b
- Romeed SA, Malik R, Dunne SM. Marginal bone loss influence on the biomechanics of single implant crowns. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:1459-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182902db0
- Unsal GS, Erbasar GNH, Aykent F, Ozyilmaz OY, Ozdogan MS. Evaluation of stress distribution on mandibular implant-supported overdentures with different bone heights and attachment types: a 3D finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2019;45:363-70. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-19-00076
- Kono K, Kurihara D, Suzuki Y, Ohkubo C. In vitro assessment of mandibular single/two implant-retained overdentures using stress-breaking attachments. Implant Dent 2014;23:456-62.
- Sato H, Kobayashi T, Nomura T, Tanabe N, Takafuji K, Kihara H, Kondo H. Oral mucosa pressure caused by mandibular implant overdenture with different types of attachments. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:145-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.003
- Leem HW, Cho IH, Lee JH, Choi YS. A study on the changes in attractive force of magnetic attachments for overdenture. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:9-15. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.9
- Lee E, Shin SY. The influence of the number and the type of magnetic attachment on the retention of mandibular mini implant overdenture. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:14-21. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.1.14
- Takeshita S, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems. Dent Mater J 2011;30:928-34. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-134
- Takahashi T, Gonda T, Tomita A, Maeda Y. Effect of attachment type on implant strain in maxillary implant overdentures: Comparison of ball, locator, and magnet attachments. Part 2: Palateless dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:357-64. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6157
- Patil PG, Seow LL, Uddanwadikar R, Ukey PD. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:138.e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.015
- Shahmiri R, Aarts JM, Bennani V, Das R, Swain MV. Strain distribution in a Kennedy Class I implant assisted removable partial denture under various loading conditions. Int J Dent 2013;2013:351279. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/351279
Cited by
- Accuracy of Proximal and Occlusal Contacts of Single Implant Crowns Fabricated Using Different Digital Scan Methods: An In Vitro Study vol.14, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112843