The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of rinsing time on the accuracy of interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing: An in vitro study

  • Lee, Beom-Il (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • You, Seung-Gyu (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • You, Seung-Min (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kang, Seen-Young (Medical Device Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • Received : 2020.09.29
  • Accepted : 2021.01.25
  • Published : 2021.02.26
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study was to evaluate the effect of rinsing time on the accuracy of interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The maxillary right first molar master die was duplicated using a silicone material, while a study die was produced using epoxy resin. Scans of the epoxy resin die were used in combination with CAD software to design a maxillary right first molar interim crown. Based on this design, 24 interim crowns were fabricated with digital light processing. This study examined the trueness and precision of products that were processed with one of the three different postprocessing rinsing times (1 min, 5 min, and 10 min). Trueness was measured by superimposing reference data with scanned data from external, intaglio, and marginal surfaces. Precision was measured by superimposing the scan data within the group. The trueness and precision data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, nonparametric, and post-hoc tests, and were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction (α=.05). RESULTS. The trueness of the external and intaglio surfaces of crowns varied significantly among the different rinsing times (P=.004, P=.003), but there was no statistically significant difference in terms of trueness measurements of the marginal surfaces (P=.605). In terms of precision, statistically significant differences were found among the external, intaglio, and marginal surfaces (P=.001). CONCLUSION. Interim crowns rinsed for 10 minutes showed high accuracy.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by Korea University (grant no. S29025026).

References

  1. Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:364-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.030
  2. Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:208-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.030
  3. Peng CC, Chung KH, Yau HT. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:514-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.024
  4. Balkenhol M, Knapp M, Ferger P, Heun U, Wostmann B. Correlation between polymerization shrinkage and marginal fit of temporary crowns. Dent Mater 2008;24: 1575-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.001
  5. Kang SY, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:354-60. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.354
  6. Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, Huang H. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:649-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012
  7. Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:536-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.012
  8. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002
  9. Revilla-Leon M, Ozcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont 2019;28:146-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12801
  10. Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003
  11. Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:260-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.007
  12. Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: a comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.003
  13. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  14. Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: a review. Dent Mater 2019;35:825-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.026
  15. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 2016;32:54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018
  16. Osman RB, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Build Angle: Does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology? Int J Prosthodont 2017;30:182-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5117
  17. Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D. Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:503-10. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4835
  18. Park GS, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Seo DG. Effects of printing parameters on the fit of implant-supported 3D printing resin prosthetics. Materials (Basel) 2019; 12:2533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162533
  19. Karalekas D, Aggelopoulos A. Study of shrinkage strains in a stereolithography cured acrylic photopolymer resin. J Mater Process Technol 2003;136:146-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00028-1
  20. Katheng A, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and degree of polymerization of stereolithography photopolymer resin under different postpolymerization conditions: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020:S0022-3913(20)30160-8.
  21. Kim J, Lee DH. Influence of the postcuring process on dimensional accuracy and seating of 3D-printed polymeric fixed prostheses. Biomed Res Int 2020; 2020:2150182.
  22. Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, Müller F, Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:637-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.001
  23. Yoon HI, Hwang HJ, Ohkubo C, Han JS, Park EJ. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:919-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.027
  24. Jeon JH, Hwang SS, Kim JH, Kim WC. Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:335-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.335
  25. Kang SY, Park JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional trueness analysis of ceramic crowns fabricated using a chairside computer-aided design/manufacturing system: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:152-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.06.004
  26. Wang W, Yu H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Gao B. Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:285-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.012
  27. Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.012
  28. Shah S, Sundaram G, Bartlett D, Sherriff M. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques. J Dent 2004;32:653-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.005
  29. ISO 12836. Dentistry digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - test methods for assessing accuracy. International Standards for Organization (ISO), Geneva: Switzerland, 2012. Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso/store.html.
  30. You SM, You SG, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of a maxillary trial denture according to the layer thickness: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;125:139-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.014
  31. Lee S, Hong SJ, Paek J, Pae A, Kwon KR, Noh K. Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:55-64. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.1.55
  32. American Dental Association. ANSI/ADA Specification No. 8 for zinc phosphate cement. In: Guide to dental materials and devices (ed 5). Chicago: American Dental Association; 1970. p. 87-8.
  33. Sherman SL, Kadioglu O, Currier GF, Kierl JP, Li J. Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models. J Am Dent Assoc 2020;157:422-8.
  34. Jeon JH, Kim DY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim WC. Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:214-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.214
  35. Martorelli M, Gerbino S, Giudice M, Ausiello P. A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques. Dent Mater 2013;29:e1-10.
  36. Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:1133-40. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.87
  37. Al-Imam H, Gram M, Benetti AR, Gotfredsen K. Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:580-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.020
  38. Loflin WA, English JD, Borders C, Harris LM, Moon A, Holland JN, Kasper FK. Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;156:283-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.02.013
  39. Kirsch C, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:551-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1916-y
  40. Bae SY, Park JY, Jeong ID, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005
  41. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  42. Park JY, Bae SY, Lee JJ, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:159-69. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.159
  43. You SM, You SG, Lee BI, Kim JH. Evaluation of trueness in a denture base fabricated by using CAD-CAM systems and adaptation to the socketed surface of denture base: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020:S0022-3913(20)30573-4.
  44. Lehmann KM, Azar MS, Kämmerer PW, Wentaschek S, Hell EN, Scheller H. The effect of optical conditioning of preparations with scan spray on preparation form. Acta Stomatol Croat 2011;45:86-92
  45. You SG, You SM, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020:S0022-3913(20)30109-8.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies vol.9, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080983