Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Structural Performance of RC Beam with Different Depths to Lap Splice Detail of SD700 Headed Bar

SD700 확대머리 철근의 겹침이음 상세를 적용한 단차가 있는 RC 보의 구조성능 평가

  • 이지형 (한밭대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김승훈 (한밭대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2021.11.26
  • Accepted : 2021.12.14
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper conducts an evaluation of the structural performance of the lap splice detail of SD700 headed bar experiment for developing an RC beam with different depths joint details. The experiment variable is lap splice length, yield strength, and end anchorage of main reinforcements. For all specimens, a headed bar was applied to the main reinforcement of the beam with low depth (B2), and the beam with high depth (B1) was applied to the main reinforcement with two splice methods: straight headed bar and 90° hooked-headed bar. The experimental results were that specimens of applying SD500 and SD600 had the results of flexural fracture at the lap splice location, which maximum load was similar. For specimens of appling SD500, the 90° hooked-headed bar of B1, suppressed horizontal cracks in the lap splice section compared to the straight headed bar. Specimens of applying an SD 700 headed bar had the results of brittle anchorage failure. In addition, maximum load was increased with the lap splice length increasing. For specimens of applying SD700 headed bar, test for test maximum load/theoretical load for test development length/design development length were estimated to be 1.30~1.48 for the ACI 318-19 equation, and 1.14~1.30 for the KDS-2021 equation. Thus, ACI 318-19 equation had conservatively greater safety factors as estimated development lengththened.

본 논문은 SD700 확대머리철근의 겹침이음을 이용한 단차가 있는 보의 접합상세를 개발하기 위하여 실시한 구조성능평가 실험결과를 나타낸다. 실험변수는 주철근의 겹침이음길이, 철근 항복강도, 단부정착상세 등이다. 모든 실험체에 대하여 춤이 작은 보(B2)의 하부 주철근은 확대머리철근을 적용하였으며, 춤이 큰 보(B1)의 하부 주철근은 일자형 확대머리철근, 90° 갈고리형 확대머리철근 등 두 가지 상세로 이음방법을 적용하였다. 실험결과, SD500과 SD600을 적용한 실험체들은 겹침이음부에서 모두 휨파괴되었으며, 이로 인하여 최대내력은 유사하게 나타났다. SD500을 적용한 실험체들에 대하여, B1의 주철근을 90°갈고리형 확대머리철근으로 적용한 상세가 확대머리철근에 비하여 겹침이음부의 수평균열을 억제하였다. SD700의 확대머리철근을 사용한 실험체는 취성적인 정착파괴가 나타났으며, 겹침이음길이의 증가에 따라 최대내력이 증가하였다. SD700의 확대머리철근을 사용한 실험체들은 실험체정착길이/이론정착길이에 대한 실험내력/이론내력이 ACI 318-19 식은 1.30~1.48로 나타났으며, KDS-2021 식은 1.14~1.30로 평가되었다. 이를 볼 때, ACI 318-19 산정식이 보다 보수적으로 정착길이를 평가함으로써 더 큰 안전율을 가지고 있었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국연구재단 2021년 지역대학우수과학자지원사업(과제번호: NRF-2020R1I1A3074602)의 연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (2019) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary. Far-mington Hills, MI; American Concrete Institute (ACI).
  2. Chun, S. C., and Lee, J. G. (2013), Strengths of Lap Splices Anchored by SD600 Headed Bars, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 25(2), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2013.25.2.217
  3. Chun, S. C., Choi, C. S., and Jung, H. S. (2017), Side-Face Blowout Failure of Large-Diameter High-Strength Headed Bars in Beam-Column Joints. ACI Structural Journal, 114(1), 1-12.
  4. KCI Committee. (2012), Concrete Design Code and Commentary, Korea Concrete Institute.
  5. Korea Construction Standards Center (2021), Korean Design Standard (KDS). Seoul, Korea; KDS 14 20 00;2021.
  6. KSEA (2018), KSEA Detailing Manual-2018, The Korean Structural Engineers Association, 90.
  7. KS B 0801. (2017), Test pieces for tensile test for metallic materials, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards.
  8. KS B 0802. (2018), Method of tensile test for metallic materials, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards.
  9. KS F 2403. (2019), Standard test method for making and curing concrete specimens, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards.
  10. KS F 2405. (2017), Standard test method for compressive of concrete, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards.
  11. Lee, K. S., Jin, S. H., Kim, S. H.(2016), Lap Details Using Headed Bars and Hooked Bars for Flexural Members with Different Depths, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintance and Inspection, 20(4), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.4.144
  12. Shao, Y., David, D., Matthew, O., Remy, L., Krishna, G., and Muna, H. (2016), Anchorage of Conventional and High-Strength Headed Reinforcing Bars. KANSAS: Structural Engineering and Engineering Materials. SM Report No. 127. 334.
  13. Sim, H. J., Chun, S. C.(2018), A Reevaluation of Anchorage Strength of Headed Bars in Exterior Beam-Column Joints, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 30(2), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.4334/jkci.2018.30.2.207
  14. Thompson, M. K., Jirsa, J. O., and Breen, J. E.(2006), Behavior and Capacity of Headed Reinforcement, ACI Structural Journal, 103(4), 522-530.