DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of Failure Cause for Elastomeric Bearing in Bridge by Earthquakes

지진에 의한 교량의 탄성받침장치 손상 원인 규명

  • 서영득 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 최형석 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터) ;
  • 김인태 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 김정한 (부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 정영수 (부산대학교 지진방재연구센터)
  • Received : 2021.07.05
  • Accepted : 2021.12.06
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

The seismic isolation system have been applied in order to protect the collapse of bridge by seismic load and the vertical load transmitted from the superstructure. However, the failure and damages of non-shrinkage mortar, isolator and wedge in total 12 bridge were reported by Pohang Earthquake. In this study, the damage mechanism and behavior characteristics of elastomeric bearing by an earthquake were evaluated to consider the seismic isolation system including non-shrinkage mortar and the seat concrete of pier. To discuss the effect of installed wedge and damage mode of elastomeric bearing, the compressive-shear tests were carried out. Also, the mechanical behaviors and damage mechanism for each component of elastomeric bearing were evaluated by using finite element analysis. From the test results, the cracks were created at boundary between non-shrinkage mortar and seismic isolator and the shear loads were rapidly increased after bump into wedge. The cause for damage mechanism of seismic isolation system was investigated by comparing stress distribution of anchor socket and non-shrinkage mortar depending on wedge during earthquake.

교량 받침장치부는 상부구조의 수직하중을 지지하여 하부구조에 전달하고, 교량의 붕괴사고를 방지하는 역할을 한다. 하지만, 포항지진에 의하여 총 12개 도로교량의 받침장치 몰탈 파손, 받침장치 파손 및 쐐기 손상이 보고되었다. 본 연구에서는 지진시 교량 받침장치부의 구조 시스템 특성을 고려하여 교각의 코핑부와 무수축몰탈을 포함한 면진받침 장치 실험체의 전단 거동특성 및 손상모드를 평가하였다. 받침장치 쐐기에 대한 영향을 확인하기 위하여 쐐기 설치 유무를 변수로 설정하였으며, 압축-전단 실험을 실시하여 면진장치의 전단 거동특성과 손상모드를 확인하였다. 또한 유한요소해석을 통하여 받침장치의 거동특성 및 각 구성요소별 손상원인을 분석하였다. 실험결과, 쐐기의 충돌 및 손상 발생 이후 급격한 하중변화가 발생하였으며, 받침장치와 무수축몰탈 경계부를 따라 균열이 발생하였다. 쐐기 유무에 따른 쐐기, 앵커 소켓 및 무수축볼탈의 응력거동을 비교함으로써 지진시 교량받침장치부의 손상원인을 규명하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국토지주택공사 지원 사업으로 진행되었으며, 이에 감사드립니다.

References

  1. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (2012), Report of Investigation for Steel Structure by Tohoku Earthquake, Committee on Steel Structures in JSCE, Tokyo, 5-11. (in Japanese)
  2. Japan Bridge Association (2016), Report of Bridge Damage Investigation by Kumamoto Earthquake, Japan Bridge Association, Tokyo, 11-18. (in Japanese)
  3. Jeon, J.S., Seo, Y.D., Choi, H.S., and Park, J.B. (2018), Examples of Bridge Damage due to Earthquakes in Korea, Proceedings of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea Conference, 25-26. (in Korean)
  4. Choi, S. W., Lim, H. J., Cho, H. J., Park, K. N., Oh, J., and Jung H. Y. (2008), Evaluation of Factors Influencing the Dynamic Characteristics of Low Hardness High Damping Rubber Bearings, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 12(3), 11-20. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2008.12.3.011
  5. Oh, J., and Jung, H. Y. (2010), An Experimental Study of the Shear Property Dependency of High Damping Rubber Bearings, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 30(2), 121-129. (in Korean)
  6. Park, S. K. (2010), Estimation of Aseismatic Performance of Laminated Rubber Bearing through Shaking Table Tests, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 13(4), 440-446. (in Korean)
  7. Moon, S. K. (2011), Variation of Seismic Behavior of Continuous Skew Plate Girder Bridges according to the Arrangement of Bearings, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 15(5), 124-135. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2011.15.5.124
  8. Yoon, H.J., Kwahk, I.J., and Kim, Y.J. (2013), A Study on the Ultimate Performances of Elastomeric Bearings in Korea, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(2), 438-449. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1398-2
  9. Lee. J. U., Jung, H. Y., Oh, J., Park, J. Y., and Kim, S. D. (2014), A Study on the Characteristics of Bridge Bearings Behavior by Finite Element Analysis and Model Test, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 18(5), 96-106. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2014.18.5.096
  10. Jang, K. S., Chang, C. G., and Lee, H. P. (2016), Influence Evaluation of the Multi-Lead Rubber Bearing due to the Compressive Stress for Nuclear Power Plant, Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures, 7(3), 55-64. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.11004/kosacs.2016.7.3.055
  11. Kim, H. S., and Oh, J. (2016), A Study on Isolation Performance of High Damping Rubber Bearing through Shaking Table Test and Analysis, Korea Academy Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(5), 601-611. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.5.601
  12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2016), KCS 24 40 05, Korea Construction Standards Center. (in Korean)
  13. Korea Standard (2018), KS F 4420, Steel-Iaminated Elastomeric Bearing for Bridge. (in Korean)
  14. International Organization for Standardization (2018), ISO 22762-2, Elastomeric Seismic - Protection Isolators - Part 2 : Applications for Bridges - Specifications. (in Korean)
  15. Yura, J., Kumar, A., Yakut, A., Topkaya, C., Becker, E., and Collingwood, J. (2001), Elastomeric Bridge Bearings: Recommended Test Methods. National Research Board, NCHRP Report 449.
  16. European Committee for Standardization (2005) EN 1337-3, Structural Bearing - Part 2: Elastomeric Bearings,