DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of COVID-19-Related Stress and Depression in Public Sector Workers

코로나 19 관련 공공근로자에서의 우울증상 및 스트레스 반응

  • Park, Jinsol (Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Hye-mi (Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Ko, Min-soo (Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Chi, Su-hyuk (Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Han, Changsu (Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Yi, Hyun-suk (Gwangmyung City Health Center) ;
  • Lee, Moon-Soo (Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Guro Hospital)
  • 박진솔 (고려대학교 구로병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 조혜미 (고려대학교 구로병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 고민수 (고려대학교 구로병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 지수혁 (고려대학교 구로병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 한창수 (고려대학교 구로병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 이현숙 (광명시 정신건강증진센터) ;
  • 이문수 (고려대학교 구로병원 정신건강의학과)
  • Received : 2021.07.19
  • Accepted : 2021.10.26
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Objectives : The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is a global medical crisis imposing particular burden on public sector employees. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychiatric distress among public sector workers amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods : We conducted a cross-sectional study with 531 public sector workers in Gwangmyung city who completed Korean versions of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Impact of Event Scale-Revised-Korean (IES-R-K). Results : The results revealed more than moderate levels of stress (85.2%), depressive symptoms (22.2%), and posttraumatic stress symptoms (38.8%). PSS total score was significantly correlated with PHQ-9, IES-R-K total scores as well as IES-R-K subscale scores. Total scores on the PSS, PHQ-9, and IES-R-K were all inversely correlated with age. Conclusions : COVID-19-related workers experience considerable stress and depressive symptoms, with self-rated stress correlating significantly with depression scores. Age may serve as a protective factor against occupational stress and burnout. These findings highlight the need for adequate psychiatric screening and intervention for public sector workers.

연구목적 코로나바이러스 사태로 인해 전세계가 보건 위기와 큰 혼란의 국면을 맞은 가운데, 특히 재난 상황에서 시민의 건강을 위해 노력하는 공공 근로자들의 신체적, 정신적 스트레스가 과중해지고 있다. 본 연구는 공공 근로자들의 정신적 스트레스를 분석하고자 했다. 방 법 본 연구에서는 광명시 정신건강복지센터 홈페이지를 통해 모집한 531명의 공공영역 종사자를 대상으로 한국판 지각된 스트레스 척 도(Perceived Stress Scale, PSS), 한국판 우울증 평가도구(Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9), 한국판 사건 충격 척도 수정판(Impact Event Scale-Revised, IES-R-K)을 시행하였다. 결 과 분석 결과에 의하면 코로나 19 관련 종사자들은 중등도 이상의 지각된 스트레스 반응(85.2%), 우울증상(22.2%), 외상 후 스트레스 관련 증 상(38.8%)을 보여, 상당한 스트레스와 우울증상을 경험하는 상태로 나타났다. PSS 총점은 PHQ-9, IES-R 총 점 및 IES-R의 하위 척도별 점수와 유의한 상관관계를 보여, 주관적으로 지각된 스트레스 반응 정도가 우울 증상과 연관되어 있음을 시사하였다. PSS, PHQ-9, IES-R 총점은 각각 모두 연령과 음의 상관관계를 보였다. 즉, 연령이 직무 스트레스 반응과 번아웃에 대한 보호요인으로 작용할 가능성이 있다. 결 론 향후에 공공영역 종사자 들의 정신건강에 관한 추가적인 연구가 필요하겠으며 정신건강 관리 및 적절한 개입이 마련되어야 할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the COVID-19 Disaster Psychological Support Program through Gwangmyeong mental health welfare center funded by Gwangmyeong city health center.

References

  1. Sun Y, Koh V, Marimuthu K, Ng OT, Young B, Vasoo S, Chan M, Lee VJM, De PP, Barkham T, Lin RTP, Cook AR, Leo YS; National Centre for Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Outbreak Research Team. Epidemiological and Clinical Predictors of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:786-792. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa322
  2. Mazzucato M, Kattel R. COVID-19 and public-sector capacity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2020;36(Supplement_1): S256-S269. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031
  3. Haleem A, Javaid M, Vaishya R. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic in daily life. Curr Med Res Pract 2020;10:78-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmrp.2020.03.011
  4. Montemurro N. The emotional impact of COVID-19: from medical staff to common people. Brain, behavior, and immunity;2020.
  5. Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. N Eng J Med 2020;383:510-512. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017
  6. Golightley M, Holloway M. Social work in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: all in this together?: Oxford University Press; 2020.
  7. Daniel J. Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects 2020;49:91-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
  8. Spoorthy MS, Pratapa SK, Mahant S. Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic-A review. Asian J Psychiat 2020;51:102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102119
  9. Vinkers CH, van Amelsvoort T, Bisson JI, Branchi I, Cryan JF, Domschke K, Howes OD, Manchia M, Pinto L, de Quervain D, Schmidt MV, van der Wee NJA. Stress resilience during the coronavirus pandemic. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2020;35:12-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.05.003
  10. Hertel G, Rauschenbach C, Thielgen MM, Krumm S. Are older workers more active copers? Longitudinal effects of agecontingent coping on strain at work. J Organ Behav 2015;36: 514-537. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1995
  11. Cohen S, Hoberman HM. Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress 1. J Appl Soc Psychol 1983;13: 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb02325.x
  12. Roberti JW, Harrington LN, Storch EA. Further psychometric support for the 10-item version of the perceived stress scale. J Coll Couns 2006;9:135-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2006.tb00100.x
  13. Ababkov VA, Barisnikov K, Vorontzova-Wenger OV, Gorbunov IA, Kapranova SV, Pologaeva EA, Stuklov KA. Validation of the Russian version of the questionnaire "Scale of perceived stress-10";2016.
  14. Gambetta-Tessini K, Marino R, Morgan M, Evans W, Anderson V. Stress and Health-Promoting Attributes in Australian, New Zealand, and Chilean Dental Students. J Dent Educ 2013; 77:801-809. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.6.tb05532.x
  15. Wiriyakijja P, Porter S, Fedele S, Hodgson T, McMillan R, Shephard M, Ni Riordain R. Validation of the HADS and PSS10 and psychological status in patients with oral lichen planus. Oral Dis 2020;26:96-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13220
  16. Lee J, Shin C, Ko YH, Lim J, Joe SH, Kim S, Jung IK, Han C. The reliability and validity studies of the Korean version of the Perceived Stress Scale. Korean J Psychosom Med 2012;20: 127-134.
  17. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care Study Group. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA 1999;282:1737-1744. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
  18. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16: 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
  19. Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2012;184:E191-E196. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110829
  20. Park SJ, Choi HR, Choi JH, Kim KW, Hong JP. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Anxiety Mood 2010;6:119-124.
  21. Wilson JP, Keane TM. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. Guilford press;2004.
  22. Eun HJ, Kwon TW, Lee SM, Kim TH, Choi MR, Cho SJ. A study on reliability and validity of the Korean version of impact of event scale-revised. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005;44:303-310.
  23. Creamer M, Bell R, Failla S. Psychometric properties of the impact of event scale-revised. J Behaviour Research Therapy 2003;41:1489-1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010
  24. Lim HK, Woo JM, Kim TS, Kim TH, Choi KS, Chung SK, Chee IS, Lee KU, Paik KC, Seo HJ, Kim W. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Compr Psychiatry 2009;50:385-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.09.011
  25. Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts DE. Who's stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009 1. J Appl Soc Psychol 2012;42:1320-1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00900.x
  26. Hong GR, Kang HK, Oh E, Park Y, Kim H. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the perceived stress scale-10 (KPSS-10) in older adults. Res Gerontol Nurs 2016;9:45-51. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20150806-72
  27. Wang Z, Chen J, Boyd JE, Zhang H, Jia X, Qiu J, Xiao Z. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale in policewomen. PloS One 2011;6:e28610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028610
  28. Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T. The Thai version of the PSS-10: an investigation of its psychometric properties. Biopsychosoc Med 2010;4:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-4-6
  29. Shin C, Ko YH, An H, Yoon HK, Han C. Normative data and psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in a nationally representative Korean population. BMC Psychiatry 2020;20:194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02613-0
  30. (KSTSS) KSoTSS. Coronavirus Disease-19 4th national mental health survey. 2021. Available from: Retrieved from http://kstss.kr/?p=2301/.
  31. Johnson SU, Ebrahimi OV, Hoffart A. PTSD symptoms among health workers and public service providers during the COVID-19 outbreak. PloS One 2020;15:e0241032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241032
  32. Nickell LA, Crighton EJ, Tracy CS, Al-Enazy H, Bolaji Y, Hanjrah S, Hussain A, Makhlouf S, Upshur RE. Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution. CMAJ 2004;170:793-798. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1031077
  33. Liu Y, Mao B, Liang S, Yang JW, Lu HW, Chai YH, Wang L, Zhang L, Li QH, Zhao L, He Y, Gu XL, Ji XB, Li L, Jie ZJ, Li Q, Li XY, Lu HZ, Zhang WH, Song YL, Qu JM, Xu JF; Shanghai Clinical Treatment Experts Group for COVID-19. Association between age and clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2020;55:2001112. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01112-2020
  34. Becerra-Garcia JA, Gimenez Ballesta G, Sanchez-Gutierrez T, Barbeito Resa S, Calvo Calvo A. Sintomas. Psychopathological symptoms during Covid-19 quarantine in spanish general population: a preliminary analysis based on sociodemographic and occupational-contextual factors. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2020;94:e202006059.
  35. Birditt KS, Fingerman KL, Almeida DM. Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: a daily diary study. Psychol Aging 2005;20:330-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.330
  36. Pearman A, Hughes ML, Smith EL, Neupert SD. Age differences in risk and resilience factors in COVID-19-related stress. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2021;76:e38-e44. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa120
  37. Albrecht O, Zierold R, Allende S, Escrig J, Patzig C, Rauschenbach B, Nielsch K, Gorlitz D. Experimental evidence for an angular dependent transition of magnetization reversal modes in magnetic nanotubes. J Appl Phys 2011;109:093910. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3583666
  38. Castellvi P, Lucas-Romero E, Miranda-Mendizabal A, ParesBadell O, Almenara J, Alonso I, Blasco MJ, Cebria A, Gabilondo A, Gili M, Lagares C, Piqueras JA, Roca M, RodriguezMarin J, Rodriguez-Jimenez T, Soto-Sanz V, Alonso J. Longitudinal association between self-injurious thoughts and behaviors and suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2017; 215:37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.035