정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제38권4호
  • /
  • Pages.199-230
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사회과학분야 학술 연구자의 연구데이터 재이용 영향요인 연구

A Study on Factors Affecting the Reuse of Research Data by Academic Researchers in the Social Sciences

  • 박지원 (전남대학교 대학원 기록관리학과) ;
  • 장우권 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.22
  • 심사 : 2021.12.15
  • 발행 : 2021.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 연구데이터 재이용에 대한 연구자 및 재이용 데이터를 조사를 통해 연구데이터 재이용 영향에 대한 분석 및 활성화 방안을 제시하는데 있다. 이를 위해 연구데이터를 재이용하여 뉴 연구결과물을 산출한 경험이 있는 국내 사회과학분야 학술 연구자를 대상으로 설문배포와 회수를 토대로 178부를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 1) 대부분의 연구자들은 데이터 리포지터리, 데이터관리시스템, 연구데이터 DB와 같은 시스템을 통해 재이용 데이터를 획득하고, 실험 및 관찰을 통해 생산된 분석데이터를 주로 재이용하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 성공적으로 연구데이터를 재이용한 연구자임에도 불구하고 연구데이터 공유에 대한 인식이 낮을뿐더러 다양한 문제에 직면하여 공유를 하지 않았다. 2) 문헌 검토와 요인 분석을 통해 도출한 10가지 요인(학문적 유용성, 연구의 효율성, 연구자의 우려사항, 데이터 취약성, 직접적 노력, 간접적 노력, 재이용 적합성, 데이터 완전성, 데이터 유용성, 사회적 조건)의 신뢰성과 타당성을 검증하였다. 3) 상관 분석결과 연구 효율성, 사회적 조건은 연구데이터 재이용 의도와 양적 상관관계가, 연구자의 우려사항, 데이터 취약성, 직접적 노력은 연구데이터 재이용 의도와 음적 상관관계가 나타났다. 회귀 분석 결과 이 요인들은 모두 연구데이터 재이용 의도에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 연구의 효율성, 사회적 조건, 직접적 노력, 연구자의 우려사항, 데이터 취약성 순서로 연구데이터 재이용 의도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 토대로 연구데이터 재이용 활성화 방안을 제시하였다.

This study is to present an analysis and activation plan for the effect of reuse of research data through investigation of researchers and reuse data on reuse of research data. To this end, 178 copies were analyzed based on the distribution and collection of surveys targeting academic researchers in the field of social science in Korea who have experience in calculating new research results by reusing research data. As a result, 1) Most researchers acquire reuse data through systems such as data repositories, data management systems, and research data DBs, and mainly reuse analysis data produced through experiments and observations. In addition, despite being a researcher who successfully reused research data, the awareness of research data sharing was low and did not share it in the face of various problems. 2) The reliability and validity of 10 factors derived through literature review and factor analysis (academic usefulness, research efficiency, researcher concerns, data vulnerability, direct effort, indirect effort, suitability for reuse, data completeness, data usefulness, and social conditions) were verified. 3) As a result of correlation analysis, research efficiency, social conditions showed a quantitative correlation with research data reuse intention, researcher concerns, data vulnerability, and direct effort showed a negative correlation with research data reuse intention. As a result of regression analysis, all of these factors had a significant effect on the intention to reuse research data, and in the order of research efficiency, social conditions, direct efforts, researchers' concerns, and data vulnerability. Based on this, a plan to revitalize the reuse of research data was proposed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, H. O. & Rieh, H. Y. (2009). A study on the methods for systematic management of research records in engineering school laboratories in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 10(1), 119-139.
  2. Choi, H. Y. & Seo, T.S. (2020). Open Science, the Path of Global Solidarity and Coexistence. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology.
  3. Digital Curation Centre. http://www.dcc.ac.uk [cited in September 30, 2021]
  4. Jeon, L. N. (2017). A Study on Environment Factors of Data Repository Affect Intention to Reuse Shared Research Data. MA. thesis, Dept. LIS, Graduate School of Yeonsei University.
  5. Kang, H. C. (2013). A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), 587-594. http://www.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  6. Kim, E. J. & Nam, T. W. (2012). Factor analysis of effects on research data collection. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(2), 27-44. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.2.027
  7. Kim, H. C. (2018). Statistical analysis done by himself. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  8. Kim, H. G. (2016). A study on the effect of selection attributes on store image and behavioral intention of coffee shop. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 28(7), 313-328.
  9. Kim, J. H. (2012). A study on university researchers' data management practices. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 433-455. http://doi.org/0.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.433 https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.433
  10. Kim, J. H. (2015). A study on the perceptions of university researchers on data management and sharing. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3), 413-436. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.413
  11. Kim, J. S., Kim, S. T., & Choi, S. K. (2019). The functional requirements of core elements for research data management and service. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 53(3), 317-344. http://doi.org//10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.317
  12. Kim, N. Y. (2019). A Study on Data Reuse Behaviors and Data Needs of Academic Researchers in the Korean Social Science Field. MA. thesis, Dept. of LIS., Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  13. Kim, S. T., Han, S. H., Lee, T. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). A study on a model for using and preserving scientific data. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 12(4), 81-93. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2010.21.4.081
  14. Kim. M. J. & Kim, S. H. (2015). A study on the factors affecting sharing of research data of science and technology researchers. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 49(2), 313-334. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.313
  15. Korean Research Memory. http://www.krm.or.kr [cited in September 30, 2021]
  16. Park, O. N. (2018). A study on ontology design for research data management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(1), 101-127. http://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.1.101
  17. Seoul National University (2010). Research ethics guidelines. Seoul National University.
  18. Shim, W. S., Ahn, H. Y., & Byun, J. Y. (2015). Strategic for improving the collection and use of research data in the humanities. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 49(3), 155-183. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.155
  19. Shim, Y. H. & Kim, J. H. (2019). A study on the development of research data management service in a domestic university library: focused on the analysis on the needs of researchers affiliated in Seoul national university. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(3), 61-80. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.3.061
  20. Shin, Y. R. & Chung, Y. K. (2012). A study on the improvement of the humanities and social sciences research data archives in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(3), 93-115.
  21. Bishop, L. (2015). Ethical sharing and reuse of qualitative data. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2009.tb00145.x
  22. Curty, R. G. (2015). Beyond "Data Thrifting": An Investigation of Factors Influencing Research Data Reuse In the Social Sciences. Ph.D. Dissertations - ALL, Syracuse University.
  23. Faniel, I. M. & Jacobsen, T. (2010). Reusing scientific data: how earthquake engineering researchers assess the reusability of colleagues' data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19, 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8
  24. Faniel, I. M. & Zimmerman, A. (2011). Beyond the data deluge: a research agenda for large-scale data sharing and reuse. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.172
  25. Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A., & Yakel, E. (2012). Data reuse and sense making among novice social scientists. Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech., 49(1), 1-10, Available: http://www.doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901068 [cited in September 30. 2021]
  26. Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A., & Yakel, E. (2016). Data reusers' trust development. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1404-1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23480
  27. Goodwin, J. (2012). The Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. n.p.: Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  28. Heaton, J. (2008). Secondary analysis of qualitative data: An overview. (n.p.): Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung.
  29. Higgins, S. (2008). The DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 134-140. Available: http://doaj.org/article/06ec0a3f0db2431a811034013d01427e [cited in October 10, 2021] https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
  30. Kiecolt, K. J. & Nathan, L. E. (1985). Secondary analysis of survey data. (n.p.): Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.
  31. Kim, Y. S. & Yoon, A. (2017). Scientists' data reuse behaviors: a multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(12), 2709-2719. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23892
  32. Kriesberg, A., Frank, R. D., Faniel, I. M., & Yakel, E. (2013). The role of data reuse in the apprenticeship process. Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech., 50(1), 1-10. Available: http://www.doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001051 [cited in September 30, 2021]
  33. Martin, P. A. (1985). More replication studies needed. Applied Nursing Research : ANR, 8(2), 102-103. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0897-1897(95)80574-5
  34. Mooney, H. & Newton, M. P. (2012). The anatomy of a data citation: discovery, reuse, and credit. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 1(1), 1-16.
  35. Niu, Jinfang (2009). Overcoming inadequate documentation. Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech., 46, 1-14. Available: http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.145046024 [cited in September 30, 2021]
  36. OECD (2007). OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. (n.p.): OECD.
  37. OECD (2015). Making Open Science a Reality. (n.p.): OECD.
  38. Open Data Guide. Open Data Handbook. (n.d.). Available: http://opendatahandbook.org. [cited in October 10, 2021]
  39. Piwowar, H. A. & Vison, T. J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ e175, 1-25. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175.
  40. Tenopir, C. Allard, Suzie, Douglass, Kimberly, Aydinoglu, Arsev Umur, Wu, Lei, Read, Eleanor, Manoff, Maribeth, & Frame, Mike (2011). Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLOS ONE, 6(6), 1-21. Available: http://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 [cited in October 10, 2021]
  41. Yoon, A. & Kim, Y. S. (2017). Social scientists' data reuse behaviors: exploring the roles of attitudinal beliefs, attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library and Information Science Research, 39, 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.07.008
  42. Yoon, A. & Lee, Y. Y. (2019). Factors of trust in data reuse. Online Information Review 43 no.7, 1245-1262. Available: http://www.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2019-0014 [cited in October 10, 2021]
  43. Yoon, A. (2014). making a square fit into a circle: researchers' experiences reusing qualitative data. Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech, 51(1), 1-4. Available: http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101140.
  44. Zimmerman, A. (2008). New knowledge from old data: the role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(5), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306704