참고문헌
- van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
- Muhlemann S, Kraus RD, Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:184-95.
- Schubert O, Schweiger J, Stimmelmayr M, Nold E, Guth JF. Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability. Br Dent J 2019;226:101-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.44
- Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019;22:11-9.
- Hasanzade M, Shirani M, Afrashtehfar KI, Naseri P, Alikhasi M. In vivo and in vitro comparison of internal and marginal fit of digital and conventional impressions for full-coverage fixed restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2019;19:236-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.04.003
- Joda T, Bragger U. Time-efficiency analysis comparing digital and conventional workflows for implant crowns: a prospective clinical crossover trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:1047-53. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3963
- Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont 2018;27:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527
- Sawase T, Kuroshima S. The current clinical relevancy of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry. Dent Mater J 2020;39:57-61. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-285
- Motel C, Kirchner E, Adler W, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Impact of different scan bodies and scan strategies on the accuracy of digital implant impressions assessed with an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2020;29:309-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13131
- Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Ozcan M. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01398-2
- Shimizu S, Shinya A, Kuroda S, Gomi H. The accuracy of the CAD system using intraoral and extraoral scanners for designing of fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater J 2017;36:402-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-326
- Revilla-Leon M, Ozcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont 2019;28:146-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12801
- Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Guth JF. 3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing. J Clin Med 2021;10:2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10092010
- Emir F, Ayyildiz S. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2021;65:365-70. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_579
- Park ME, Shin SY. Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:861.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.020
- Buda M, Bratos M, Sorensen JA. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:913-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.011
- Revilla-Leon M, Gonzalez-Martin O, Perez Lopez J, Sanchez-Rubio JL, Ozcan M. Position accuracy of implant analogs on 3d printed polymer versus conventional dental stone casts measured using a coordinate measuring machine. J Prosthodont 2018;27:560-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12708
- Maria R, Tan MY, Wong KM, Lee BCH, Chia VAP, Tan KBC. Accuracy of implant analogs in 3d printed resin models. J Prosthodont 2021;30:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13217
- Revilla-Leon M, Fogarty R, Barrington JJ, Zandinejad A, Ozcan M. Influence of scan body design and digital implant analogs on implant replica position in additively manufactured casts. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:202-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.011
- Zhang Y, Tian J, Wei D, Di P, Lin Y. Quantitative clinical adjustment analysis of posterior single implant crown in a chairside digital workflow: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:1059-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13519
- Joda T, Bragger U. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1304-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12270
- Joda T, Katsoulis J, Bragger U. Clinical fitting and adjustment time for implant-supported crowns comparing digital and conventional workflows. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:946-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12377
- Joda T, Bragger U. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:1401-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12753
- Pan S, Guo D, Zhou Y, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF, Muhlemann S. Time efficiency and quality of outcomes in a model-free digital workflow using digital impression immediately after implant placement: A double-blind self-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:617-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13447
- Di Fiore A, Vigolo P, Graiff L, Stellini E. Digital vs conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: a comparison of key considerations. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:577-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5938
- Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1430-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12476
- Hamm J, Berndt EU, Beuer F, Zachriat C. Evaluation of model materials for CAD/CAM in vitro studies. Int J Comput Dent 2020;23:49-56.
- Dupagne L, Tapie L, Lebon N, Mawussi B. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method. J Prosthet Dent 2021:S0022-3913(21)00076-7.
- Ellakany P, Tantawi ME, Mahrous AA, Al-Harbi F. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral dental scanners with different CAD/CAM scanning technologies: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2021 Jun 4. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13400.
- Semper-Hogg W, Kraft S, Stiller S, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1017-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0786-1
- Hogg WS, Zulauf K, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. The influence of torque tightening on the position stability of the abutment in conical implant-abutment connections. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:538-41. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3853
- Oh KC, Lee B, Park YB, Moon HS. Accuracy of three digitization methods for the dental arch with various tooth preparation designs: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:195-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12998
- Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x
- Warreth A, Doody K, Al-Mohsen M, Morcos O, AlMohsen M, Ibieyou N. Fundamentals of occlusion and restorative dentistry. Part II: occlusal contacts, interferences and occlusal considerations in implant patients. J Ir Dent Assoc 2015;61:252-9.