Journal of Ecology and Environment

한국생태학회 (The Ecological Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Northward expansion trends and future potential distribution of a dragonfly Ischnura senegalensis Rambur under climate change using citizen science data in South Korea

  • Shin, Sookyung (Department of Biological Resources Utilization, National Institute of Biological Resources) ;
  • Jung, Kwang Soo (Odonata Society of Korea) ;
  • Kang, Hong Gu (NATURING) ;
  • Dang, Ji-Hee (Department of Biological Resources Utilization, National Institute of Biological Resources) ;
  • Kang, Doohee (Department of Biological Resources Utilization, National Institute of Biological Resources) ;
  • Han, Jeong Eun (Department of Biological Resources Utilization, National Institute of Biological Resources) ;
  • Kim, Jin Han (Department of Biological Resources Utilization, National Institute of Biological Resources)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.08
  • 심사 : 2021.11.18
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Citizen science is becoming a mainstream approach of baseline data collection to monitor biodiversity and climate change. Dragonflies (Odonata) have been ranked as the highest priority group in biodiversity monitoring for global warming. Ischnura senegalensis Rambur has been designated a biological indicator of climate change and is being monitored by the citizen science project "Korean Biodiversity Observation Network." This study has been performed to understand changes in the distribution range of I. senegalensis in response to climate change using citizen science data in South Korea. Results: We constructed a dataset of 397 distribution records for I. senegalensis, ranging from 1980 to 2020. The number of records sharply increased over time and space, and in particular, citizen science monitoring data accounted for the greatest proportion (58.7%) and covered the widest geographical range. This species was only distributed in the southern provinces until 2010 but was recorded in the higher latitudes such as Gangwon-do, Incheon, Seoul, and Gyeonggi-do (max. Paju-si, 37.70° latitude) by 2020. A species distribution model showed that the annual mean temperature (Bio1; 63.2%) and the maximum temperature of the warmest month (Bio5; 16.7%) were the most critical factors influencing its distribution. Future climate change scenarios have predicted an increase in suitable habitats for this species. Conclusions: This study is the first to show the northward expansion in the distribution range of I. senegalensis in response to climate warming in South Korea over the past 40 years. In particular, citizen science was crucial in supplying critical baseline data to detect the distribution change toward higher latitudes. Our results provide new insights on the value of citizen science as a tool for detecting the impact of climate change on ecosystems in South Korea.

키워드

과제정보

We are grateful to many citizen scientists participating in the K-BON, especially Jae Won Jang, Jae Man Kim, Myung Hoe Oh, and Su Hwan Lee of the Odonata Society of Korea who collected the major part of the citizen data used in our study, and all volunteer dragonfly observers of the NATURING. Their monitoring and records made possible the distribution shifts analysis. We also thank anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the drafts of this article.

참고문헌

  1. Aceves-Bueno E, Adeleye AS, Feraud M, Huang Y, Tao M, Yang Y, et al. The accuracy of citizen science data. Bull Ecol Soc Am. 2017;98(4):278-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1336.
  2. Adhikari P, Jeon J-Y, Kim HW, Oh H-S. Northward range expansion of southern butterflies according to climate change in South Korea. J Clim Chang Res. 2020;11(6-1):643-56. https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2020.11.6.643.
  3. Askew RR. The dragonflies of Europe. Colchester: Harley Books; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004474383.
  4. Baker DJ, Hartley AJ, Butchart SHM, Willis SG. Choice of baseline climate data impacts projected species' responses to climate change. Glob Chan Biol. 2016;22(7):2392-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13273.
  5. Balzan MV. Associations of dragonflies (Odonata) to habitat variables within the Maltese Islands: a spatiotemporal approach. J Insect Sci. 2012;12(87):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.8701.
  6. Bird TJ, Bates AE, Lefcheck JS, Hill NA, Thomson RJ, Edgar GJ, et al. Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biol Conserv. 2014;173:144-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037.
  7. Cerini F, Stellati L, Luiselli L, Vignoli L. Long-term shifts in the communities of Odonata: effect of chance or climate change? North-West J Zool. 2020;16:1-6.
  8. Corbet PS. Are Odonata useful as bioindicators? Libellula. 1993;12:91-102.
  9. Cox J, Oh EY, Simmons B, Lintott C, Masters K, Greenhill A, et al. Defining and measuring success in online citizen science: a case study of zooniverse projects. Comput Sci Eng. 2015;17(4):28-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2015.65.
  10. Dickinson JL, Shirk J, Bonter D, Bonney R, Crain RL, Martin J, et al. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front Ecol Environ. 2012;10(6):291-7. https://doi.org/10.1890/110236.
  11. Fourcade Y, Engler JO, Rodder D, Secondi J. Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: a performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e97122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097122.
  12. Fuccillo KK, Crimmins TM, de Rivera CE, Elder TS. Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring. Int J Biometeorol. 2014;59(7):917-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0892-7.
  13. Grewe Y, Hof C, Dehling DM, Brandl R, Brandle M. Recent range shifts of European dragonflies provide support for an inverse relationship between habitat predictability and dispersal. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2013;22(4):403-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12004.
  14. Hassall C, Thompson DJ. The effects of environmental warming on Odonata: a review. Int J Odonatol. 2008;11(2):131-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2008.9748319.
  15. Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Thomas CD. A northward shift of range margins in British Odonata. Glob Chang Biol. 2005;11(3):502-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00904.x.
  16. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005;25(15):1965-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276.
  17. Ishida S. Insects' Life in Japan. Vol. 2. Dragonflies. Tokyo: Hoikusha; 1969.
  18. Jung KS. Odonata of Korea. Seoul: Ilgongyuksa; 2007.
  19. Kim CH, Kang JH, Kim M. Status and development of National Ecosystem Survey in Korea. J Environ Impact Assess. 2013;22(6):725-38. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2013.22.6.725.
  20. Kim MJ, Lee H, Ban YG, Lee SD, Kim DE. Prediction of changes in habitat distribution of the alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica) using RCP climate change scenarios. Korean J Appl Entomol. 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2018.01.1.056.
  21. Kim Y, Shim KM, Jung MP, Choi IT, Kang KK. Study on the change of climate zone in South Korea by the climate change scenarios. Kor J Agric For Meteorol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2017.19.2.37.
  22. Kwon JM. The distribution of Lycaenid species in Korea according to climate factors. MS Thesis. Yeungnam University, Daegu-si, Korea; 2012.
  23. Kwon TS, Lee CM, Kim SS. Northward range shifts in Korean butterflies. Clim Chan. 2014;126(1-2):163-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1212-2.
  24. La Sorte FA, Lepczyk CA, Burnett JL, Hurlbert AH, Tingley MW, Zuckerberg B. Opportunities and challenges for big data ornithology. Condor. 2018;120(2):414-26. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-17-206.1.
  25. Lancaster LT, Dudaniec RY, Hansson B, Svensson EI. Latitudinal shift in thermal niche breadth results from thermal release during a climate-mediated range expansion. J Biogeogr. 2015;42(10):1953-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12553.
  26. Leach K, Montgomery WI, Reid N. Modelling the influence of biotic factors on species distribution patterns. Ecol Model. 2016;337:96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.06.008.
  27. Lee BY, Nam GH, Yun JH, Cho GY, Lee JS, Kim J-H, et al. Biological indicators to monitor responses against climate change in Korea. Korean J Pl Taxon. 2010;40(4):202-7. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2010.40.4.202.
  28. Lee C-M, Kwon TS, Ji OY, Kim SS, Park GE, Lim JH. Prediction of abundance of forest flies (Diptera) according to climate scenarios RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 in South Korea. J Asia Pac Biodivers. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2015.10.009.
  29. Lee S, Jeon H, Kim M. Spatial distribution of butterflies in accordance with climate change in the Korean peninsula. Sustainability. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051995.
  30. Lewandowski EJ, Oberhauser KS. Butterfly citizen scientists in the United States increase their engagement in conservation. Biol Conserv. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.029.
  31. Loarie SR, Duffy PB, Hamilton H, Asner GP, Field CB, Ackerly DD. The velocity of climate change. Nature. 2009;462(7276):1052-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08649.
  32. Lobo JM, Jimenez-Valverde A, Real R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2008;17(2):145-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x.
  33. Moon J, Shim C, Jung OJ, Hong J-W, Han J, Song Y-I. Characteristics in regional climate change over South Korea for regional climate policy measures: based on long-term observations. J Clim Chan Res. 2020;11(6-2):755-70. https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2020.11.6.755.
  34. Moore MP, Hersch K, Sricharoen C, Lee S, Reice C, Rice P, et al. Sex-specific ornament evolution is a consistent feature of climatic adaptation across space and time in dragonflies. PNAS. 2021;118(28):e2101458118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101458118.
  35. National Institute of Biological Resources. Operation of the Korea biodiversity observation network (K-BON) with civil participation II-1. Incheon: National Institute of Biological Resources; 2017.
  36. National Institute of Biological Resources. The Guidebook of Climate Sensitive Biological Indicator Species. Seoul: Goryeo C&P; 2019.
  37. National Institute of Biological Resources. Operation of the Korea biodiversity observation network (K-BON) with civil participation (2020). Incheon: National Institute of Biological Resources; 2020.
  38. National Institute of Meteorological Sciences. Global climate change forecast report. Jeju-do: National Institute of Meteorological Sciences; 2019.
  39. Ozana S, Burda M, Hykel M, Malina M, Prasek M, Barta D, et al. Dragonfly Hunter CZ: mobile application for biological species recognition in citizen science. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0210370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210370.
  40. Pacifici M, Foden W, Visconti P, et al. Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2448.
  41. Park CY, Choi YE, Kwon YA, Kwon JI, Lee HS. Studies on changes and future projections of subtropical climate zones and extreme temperature events over South Korea using high resolution climate change scenario based on PRIDE model. J Kor Assoc Reg Geogr. 2013;19:600-14.
  42. Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003;421(6918):37-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286.
  43. Pecl GT, Stuart-Smith J, Walsh P, Bray DJ, Martha K, Burgess M, et al. Redmap Australia: challenges and successes with a large-scale citizen science-based approach to ecological monitoring and community engagement on climate change. Front Mar Sci. 2019;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00349.
  44. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 2006;190(3-4):231-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.
  45. Pocock MJO, Chandler M, Bonney R, Thornhill I, Albin A, August T, et al. Chapter Six-a vision for global biodiversity monitoring with citizen science. Adv in Ecol Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003.
  46. Rapacciuolo G, Ball-Damerow JE, Zeilinger AR, Resh VH. Detecting long-term occupancy changes in Californian Odonates from natural history and citizen science records. Biodivers Conserv. 2017;26(12):2933-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1399-4.
  47. Ribera I, Vogler AP. Habitat type as a determinant of species range sizes: the example of lotic-lentic differences in aquatic Coleoptera. Biol J Linn Soc. 2000;71(1):33-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01240.x.
  48. Roy-Dufresne E, Saltre F, Cooke BD, Mellin C, Mutze G, Cox T, et al. Modeling the distribution of a wide-ranging invasive species using the sampling efforts of expert and citizen scientists. Ecol Evol. 2019;9(19):11053-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5609.
  49. Sharma G, Clausnitzer V. Ischnura senegalensis. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: e.T59897A75436136.0; 2016. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T59897A75436136.en. Accessed 09 Sept 2020
  50. Shin S, Kim JH, Dang JH, Seo IS, Lee BY. Elevational distribution ranges of vascular plant species in the Baekdudaegan mountain range, South Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2021;45(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-021-00182-1.
  51. Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24(9):467-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017.
  52. Suhling F, Suhling I, Richter O. Temperature response of growth of larval Dragonflies-an overview. Int J Odonatol. 2015;18(1):15-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2015.1009392.
  53. Suzuki-Ohno Y, Yokoyama J, Nakashizuka T, Kawata M. Utilization of photographs taken by citizens for estimating bumblebee distributions. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10581-x.
  54. Termaat T, van Strien AJ, van Grunsven RHA, Knijf GD, Bjelke U, Burbach K, et al. Distribution trends of European dragonflies under climate change. Divers Distrib. 2019;25(6):936-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12913.
  55. Thapa A, Wu R, Hu Y, Nie Y, Singh PB, Khatiwada JR, et al. Predicting the potential distribution of the endangered red panda across its entire range using MaxEnt modeling. Ecol Evol. 2018;8(21):10542-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4526.
  56. Urban MC, Bocedi G, Hendry AP, Mihoub JB, Pe'er G, Singer A, et al. Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science. 2016;353(6304). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad8466.
  57. van Vuuren DPV, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chan. 2011;109(1-2):5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z.
  58. VanDerWal J, Murphy HT, Kutt AS, Perkins GC, Bateman BL, Perry JJ, et al. Focus on poleward shifts in species' distribution underestimates the fingerprint of climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2012;3(3):239-43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1688.
  59. Wang Y, Casajus N, Buddlle C, Berteaux D, Larrivee M. Predicting the distribution of poorly documented species, Northern black widow (Latrodectus variolus) and Black purse-web spider (Sphodros niger), using museum specimens and citizen science data. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0201094. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201094.
  60. Wiens JJ. Climate-related local extinctions are already widespread among plant and animal species. PLoS Biology. 2016;14(12):e2001104. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001104.
  61. Yum JH. Systematics of the Zygoptera (Odonata , Insecta) in Kore. Seoul: MS Thesis. Seoul Women's University; 2000.
  62. Yum JW, Lee HY, Bae YJ. Taxonomic review of the Korean Zygoptera (Odonata). Bull Entomol Res. 2010;26:41-55.