Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Established Requirements for Records through Precedent Analysis: Focusing on "Inter-Korean Summit Meeting Minutes Deletion" Cases

판례 분석을 통한 기록의 성립 요건 검토: '남북정상회담회의록 삭제' 판례를 중심으로

  • Received : 2021.01.18
  • Accepted : 2021.02.02
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the court ruling on "Inter-Korean Summit Meeting Minutes Deletion," identify how the established requirements, concept, and scope for the records prescribed in the Public Records Management Act are applied in actual cases, and summarize the future tasks. It analyzes the "approval theory" as the point of establishment for records by the ruling means and how the meaning of approval is determined, and examines the difference between the e-jiwon System and the On-Nara System to understand the meaning of ruling clearly. Moreover, it analyzes how the "Invalidity of Public Documents Crime" in Article 141 in the Criminal Act influences record management. Based on such comprehensive case analyses, the study proposes what tasks the administrative agencies such as the National Archives of Korea and the Ministry of the Interior and Safety should perform.

본 연구는 '남북정상회담 회의록 삭제' 사건에 대한 법원의 판결문을 분석하여, 기록의 성립요건, 개념, 범위 등이 재판에서 어떻게 적용되고 있는지 파악하고, 앞으로의 과제를 정리하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 판결에서 기록의 성립 시점으로 밝히고 있는 '결재설'이 어떤 의미를 갖고 있는지, 결재의 의미를 어떻게 판단했는지 분석한다. 분석을 통해 기록의 성립 시점이 공공기록 관리에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 살펴본다. 판결의 의미를 명확히 이해하기 위해 e지원시스템과 온나라 시스템을 차이점도 분석하였다. 또 형법 제141조 '공용전자기록등 손상죄'가 기록관리에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 분석한다. 이러한 종합적인 판례 분석을 토대로 국가기록원, 행정안전부 등 행정기관이 어떤 과제를 수행해야 하는지 제안한다. 먼저 기록의 성립과 관련해 기록의 개념을 분화해서 명확히 사용해야 함을 주장한다. 판례로 형성된 기록의 생산시점인 '결재'에 대해서도 행정협업 및 효율에 관한 규정 등을 종합적으로 검토하여 명확히 해야 함을 역설하였다. 또한 행정정보데이터세트 등 새로운 유형의 기록에 대한 성립요건 등을 결정하는 일도 시급하다고 보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jang, Dae Hwan & Kim, Ik-Han (2019). Memory, Records and Archival Justice. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 277-320. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.277
  2. Jung, Jin Im & Park, Jong Yeon (2013). Records Management Issues Surrounding the Disappearance of NLL Transcripts. Korea National Archives Research Institute.
  3. Kang, Tae Young & Min, Ki Young (2017). e-jiwon, the President's Way of Working. Seoul: Happy Book reading.
  4. Korea Legislative Research Institute (2019). Legislative Evaluation and Improvement of the Public Records Management Act.
  5. Lee, Gemma & OH, Kyung-Mook (2020). A Study on the Judgment of Authoritative Records by Applying the Concept of Authenticity and Reliability. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(3), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.3.077
  6. Lee, Gemma (2019). The Concept and Requirements of Establishment of Records. Records Management Issue Paper, vol.02. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  7. Lim, Sin Young (2019). What is a Record? Records Management Issue Paper, vol.02. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  8. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2018). Handbook of Administrative Operations.
  9. National Archives of Korea (2018). Records Management Reflection White Paper.
  10. National Archives of Korea (2020). Administrative Information Data Set Records Management Execution Manual.
  11. National Records Management Innovation T/F (2017). National Records Management Innovation Plan. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  12. Seol, Moon-won (2019). Exploring the Concepts of Records as Persistent Representation of Activities. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 5-46. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.005
  13. Zoh, Youngsam (2011). A Study on Presidential Records & Archives Management in Korea. Myong Ji University Graduate School of Records, Archives & Information Science Ph.D. in Records, Archives & Information Science doctoral thesis.
  14. ACT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF PRESIDENTIAL ARCHIVES [Enforcement Date 28.Jul.2007]
  15. ACT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF PRESIDENTIAL ARCHIVES [Enforcement Date 5.Aug.2010]
  16. ACT ON THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS [Enforcement Date 1.Jan.2000]
  17. CRIMINAL ACT [Enforcement Date 20.Oct.2020]
  18. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT ACT [Enforcement Date 20.Dec.2020]
  19. ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF ACT ON THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS [Enforcement Date 5.Apr.2007]
  20. ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT ACT [Enforcement Date 5.Jan.2021]
  21. ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE MANAGEMENT OF PRESIDENTIAL ARCHIVES [Enforcement Date 26.Jul.2017]
  22. ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE MANAGEMENT OF PRESIDENTIAL ARCHIVES [Enforcement Date 28.Jul.2007]
  23. ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACT [Enforcement Date 5.Jan.2021]
  24. Enforcement rule of the Regulations on administrative efficiency and promotion of collaboration [Enforcement Date 17.Oct.2017]
  25. Office management regulations [Enforcement Date 28.Oct.2007]
  26. PUBLIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT ACT [Enforcement Date 4.Jun.2020]
  27. Regulations on administrative efficiency and promotion of collaboration [Enforcement Date 5.Jan.2021]
  28. Seoul Central District Court 2013gohap1232 (6.Feb.2015)
  29. Seoul Central District Court 2019gohap186 (13.Jan.2020)
  30. Seoul High Court 2015no622 (24.Nov.2015)
  31. Supreme Court of Korea 2015do19296 (10.Dec.2020)
  32. Supreme Court of Korea 2016do7104 (14.Jan.2021)
  33. Supreme Court of Korea 71do324 (30.Mar.1971)
  34. Supreme Court of Korea 95do1395 (10.Nov.1995)
  35. Supreme Court of Korea 98do360 (21.Aug.1998)