Advances in aircraft and spacecraft science

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Photogrammetry-based reverse engineering method for aircraft airfoils prediction

  • Ba Zuhair, Mohammed A. (Technische Universitat Hamburg (TUHH), Institute fur Lufttransportsysteme)
  • Received : 2021.05.30
  • Accepted : 2021.11.30
  • Published : 2021.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Airframe internal and external specifications are the product of intensive intellectual efforts and technological breakthroughs distinguishing each aircraft manufacturer. Therefore, geometrical information characterizing aircraft primary aerodynamic surfaces remain classified. When attempting to model real aircraft, many members of the aeronautical community depend on their personal expertise and generic design principles to bypass the confidentiality obstacles and sketch real aircraft airfoils, which therefore vary for the same aircraft due to the different designers' initial assumptions. This paper presents a photogrammetric shape prediction method for deriving geometrical properties of real aircraft airframe by utilizing their publicly accessible static and dynamic visual content. The method is based on extracting the visually distinguishable curves at the fairing regions between aerodynamic surfaces and fuselage. Two case studies on B-29 and B-737 are presented showing how to approximate the sectional coordinates of their wing inboard airfoils and proving the good agreement between the geometrical and aerodynamic properties of the replicated airfoils to their original versions. Therefore, the paper provides a systematic reverse engineering approach that will enhance aircraft conceptual design and flight performance optimization studies.

Keywords

References

  1. AIAA CFD High Lift Prediction Workshops (2020), 4th AIAA CFD High Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW-4); AIAA & NASA, USA, https://hiliftpw.larc.nasa.gov/Workshop4/geometries.html.
  2. Aicardi, I., Lingua, A., Mazzara, L., Musci, M.A. and Rizzo, G. (2020), "Ice detection on airplane wings using a photogrammetric point cloud: A simulation", Proceedings of the International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43, 183-189. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b2-2020-183-2020.
  3. Ashton, N. and Skaperdas, V. (2019), "Verification and validation of OpenFOAM for high-lift aircraft flows", J. Aircr., 56(4), 1641-1657. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/1.C034918.
  4. UIUC Applied Aerodynamics Group (2021a), B29 Root Airfoil; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A. https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/ads/coord/b29root.dat.
  5. UIUC Applied Aerodynamics Group (2021b), B737a Airfoil; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A. https://m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/ads/coord/b737a.dat.
  6. SUAVE (2018), Boeing 737 Using AVL; Stanford Aerospace Design Lab, California, U.S.A. https://suave.stanford.edu/tutorials/avl.html.
  7. Buonamici, F., Carfagni, M., Furferi, R., Governi, L., Lapini, A. and Volpe, Y. (2018), "Reverse engineering modeling methods and tools: a survey", Comput. Aided Design., 15(3), 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2017.1397894.
  8. De Grave, E. (2017), "Reverse engineering of passenger jets-classified design parameters", M.Sc. Thesis, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.
  9. Demoulin, Q., Lefebvre-Albaret, F., Basarab, A., Kouame, D. and Tourneret, J. Y. (2020), "A new flexible photogrammetry instrumentation for estimating wing deformation in airbus", Proceedings of the ETTC2020: European Test and Telemetry Conference, Online, June.
  10. Drela, M. (2000), XFOIL Subsonic Airfoil Development System; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. https://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/.
  11. Gomez, A., Olmos, V., Racero, J., Rios, J., Arista, R. and Mas, F. (2017), "Development based on reverse engineering to manufacture aircraft custom-made parts", Int. J. Mechatron. Manuf. Syst., 10(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMS.2017.084406
  12. Green, R. (2013), A6-EDY A380 Emirates 31 Jan 2013 JFK; Flicker, Bedford, U.K. https://www.flickr.com/photos/miqspix/4843636798/.
  13. He, X., Li, J., Mader, C.A., Yildirim, A. and Martins, J.R. (2019), "Robust aerodynamic shape optimization - from a circle to an airfoil", Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 87, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.051.
  14. Huband, J.M. (1997), "Reverse engineering of aircraft wing data using a partial differential equation surface model", Ph.D. Dissertation, Old Dominion University, Virginia, USA.
  15. Littell, J.D. (2016), Experimental Photogrammetric Techniques Used on Five Full-Scale Aircraft Crash Tests, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Langley Research Center, Virginia, U.S.A.
  16. Olejnik, A., Kiszkowiak, L., Dziubinski, A. (2018), "Aerodynamic modeling process using reverse engineering and computational fluid dynamics", Proceedings of the Earth and Space 2018: Engineering for Extreme Environments, Virginia, U.S.A., April.
  17. Optical Measuring Techniques (2008), Application Example: Reverse Engineering Aerospace: Digitizing of a full-scale Falcon 20 "Zero-g" jet aircraft; GOM mbH, Braunschweig, Germany. https://www.gom.com/fileadmin/user_upload/industries/falcon_EN.pdf.
  18. Orlita, M. and Vos, R. (2017), "Cruise performance optimization of the airbus A320 through flap morphing", Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Denver, U.S.A., June.
  19. Perez-Arribas, F., Castaneda-Sabadell, I. (2016), "Automatic modelling of airfoil data points", Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 55, 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.06.016.
  20. Potabatti, N. S. (2019), "Photogrammetry for 3D reconstruction in solidworks and its applications in industry", M.Sc. Thesis, Purdue University Graduate School, Indiana, U.S.A.
  21. Sadraey, M. H. (2012), Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K.
  22. Sun, J., Hoekstra, J.M. and Ellerbroek, J. (2020), "Estimating aircraft drag polar using open flight surveillance data and a stochastic total energy model", Transport. Res. C Emer., 114, 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.026.
  23. Visser, M. (2010), u berflug in Airbus-Werkslackierung; Flicker, California, U.S.A. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A380#/media/Datei:Airbus_A380_overfly_crop.jpg.
  24. Wang, Y.M., Yu, S.Y., Ren, S., Cheng, S. and Liu, J.Z. (2020), "Close-range industrial photogrammetry and application: review and outlook", Proceedings of the Optics Ultra Precision Manufacturing and Testing Conference, Beijing, China, November.
  25. Werner-Spatz, C., Heinze, W. and Horst, P. (2009), "Improved representation of high-lift devices for a multidisciplinary conceptual aircraft design process", J. Aircr., 46(6), 1984-1994. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42845.
  26. Xiong, J., Tang, S. and Guo, J. (2011), "Approach of aircraft configuration with complex free-form surface design based on reverse engineering", Proceedings of the 2011th International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology, Harbin, China, March.