대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제16권4호
  • /
  • Pages.95-102
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

물건 들기 시 복부 안정화 방법에 따른 몸통 근육 활성도 비교

Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activation During Lifting with Stabilization Method

  • 김하림 (좋은삼선병원) ;
  • 손호희 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Kim, Ha-Rim (Department of Sports Exercise Therapy Center, Good Samsun Hospital) ;
  • Son, Ho-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.24
  • 심사 : 2021.09.21
  • 발행 : 2021.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE: This study examined the muscle activity of the abdominal muscle when lifting with abdominal hollowing with visual feedback and lifting with a pelvic compression belt. This study suggests how to lift an object safely in the workplace for people who bend their backs repeatedly. METHODS: The study was conducted on healthy men in their 20s and 30s. When lifting a 7kg object, lifting with abdominal hollowing with visual feedback, and lifting an object with a pelvic compression belt were performed three times in random order. The muscle activities were measured rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), internal oblique/transverse abdominis (IO/TrA) muscles, and abdominal hollowing exercises, and box lifting exercises were carried out in advance before the experiment. One-way ANOVA was used to compare muscle activities, and a Tukey HSD was used for post-analysis. The level of significance was set to .05. RESULTS: According to the study, there was no significant difference in muscle activity of the RA muscle depending on the lifting method (p > .05). There were significant differences between the EO and IO/TrA muscle (p < .05). The IO/TrA muscle activity showed the largest increase in lifting an abdominal hollowing with visual feedback (p < .05). The EO muscle activity increased in pelvic compression belt lifting (p < .05). The muscle activity was increased in RA, but there was no significant difference (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Abdominal hollowing lifting with visual feedback increases the muscle activity of the IO/TrA muscle, which is higher than normal, and affects the core stability of the body.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Haddas R, Yang J, Lieberman I. Effects of volitional spine stabilization on lifting task in recurrent low back pain population. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2833-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4586-1
  2. Wang Z, Wu L, Sun J, et al. Squat, stoop, or semi-squat: a comparative experiment on lifting technique. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2012;32(4):630-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-012-1009-3
  3. Straker L. Evidence to support using squat, semi-squat and stoop techniques to lift low-lying objects. Int J Ind Ergon. 2003;31(3):14960.
  4. Dolan P, Mannion AF, Adams MA. Passive tissues help the back muscles to generate extensor moments during lifting. J Biomech. 1994;27(8):1077-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90224-0
  5. Kisner C, Corby LA. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques (5th ed). Philadelphia, PA, F.A. Davis Co. 2010.
  6. Arumugam, A., Milosavljevic S, Woodley S, et al. Effects of external pelvic compression on form closure, force closure, and neuromotor control of the lumbopelvic spine - A systematic review. Man Ther. 2012;17(4):275-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.01.010
  7. Jung HS, Jeon HS, Oh DW, et al. Effect of the pelvic compression belt on the hip extensor activation patterns of sacroiliac joint pain patients during one-leg standing: a pilot study. Man Ther. 2013;18(2):143-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.09.003
  8. Stuge B, Hilde G, Vollestad N. Physical therapy for pregnancy-related low back and pelvic pain: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(11):983-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.2003.00125.x
  9. JE Lee, CH Yi, OY Kwon, et al. Dynamic Balance and Muscle Activity of the Trunk and Hip Extensor Following the Wearing of Pelvic Compression. Phys Ther Korea. 2015;22(1):49-57. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2015.22.1.049
  10. Vleeming A, Buyruk HM, Stoeckart R, et al. An integrated therapy for peripartum pelvic instability: a study of the biomechanical effects of pelvic belts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(4):1243-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90615-2
  11. Pel JJ, Spoor CW, Goossens RH, et al. Biomechanical model study of pelvic belt influence on muscle and ligament forces. J Biomech. 2008;41(9):1878-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.002
  12. HJ Jang, SY Kim, HJ Park, et al. Effects of the Pelvic Compression Belt on Trunk Muscles Activities During Sit-to-Stand, and Stand-to-Sit Tasks. Phys Ther Korea. 2013;20(1):1-9.
  13. de Groot M, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Spoor CW, et al The active straight leg raising test (ASLR) in pregnant women: differences in muscle activity and force between patients and healthy subjects. Man Ther. 2008;13(1):68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.08.006
  14. Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, et al. Insufficient lumbopelvic stability: a clinical, anatomical and biomechanical approach to 'a-specific' low back pain. Man Ther. 1998;3(1):12-20. https://doi.org/10.1054/math.1998.0311
  15. Henry SM, Westervelt KC. The use of real-time ultrasound feedback in teaching abdominal hollowing exercises to healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(6):338-45. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.6.338
  16. Coenen P, Campbell A, Kemp-Smith K, et al. Abdominal bracing during lifting alters trunk muscle activity and body kinematics. Appl Ergon. 2017;63:91-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.009
  17. Damen L, Spoor CW, Snijders CJ, et al. Does a pelvic belt influence sacroiliac joint laxity?. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17(7):495-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00045-1
  18. Mens JM, Damen L, Snijders CJ, et al. The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(2):122-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.016
  19. Cogill L, Fitz-Ritson D. The effect of trochanteric support on low back strength: a pilot study. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 1996;40(2):104-7.
  20. Goncalves M, Pereira MP. Effect of a pelvic belt on EMG activity during manual load lifting. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria E Desempenho Humano 2009;11(2):1519.
  21. Udo H, Yoshinaga F. Effect of a pelvic belt on abdominal pressure by various weights and bending angles. Ind Health. 1997;35(2):229-34. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.35.229
  22. Son HH, Kim HR, Comparison of abdominal muscle thickness during abdominal hollowing exercise according to visual feedback method. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2021;16(3):107-13. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2021.16.3.107
  23. Suehiro T, Mizutani M, Watanabe S, et al. Comparison of spine motion and trunk muscle activity between abdominal hollowing and abdominal bracing maneuvers during prone hip extension. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014;18(3):482-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.04.012
  24. Kendall F, McCreary E, Provance P, et al. Muscles: Testing and function, with posture and pain, 5th ed. Baltimore. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2005.
  25. Teyhen DS, Miltenberger CE, Deiters HM, et al. The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(6):346-55. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.6.346
  26. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(22):2640-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611150-00014
  27. Sapsford RR, Hodges PW. Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1081-88. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.24297
  28. Richardson CA, Snijders CJ, Hides JA, et al. The relation between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(4):399-405. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200202150-00015
  29. Beales DJ, O'Sullivan PB, Briffa NK. The effects of manual pelvic compression on trunk motor control during an active straight leg raise in chronic pelvic girdle pain subjects. Man Ther. 2010;15(2):190-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2009.10.008
  30. Darlow B, Perry M, Stanley J, et al. Cross-sectional survey of attitudes and beliefs about back pain in New Zealand. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004725. Published 2014 May 23. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004725
  31. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, et al. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(8):755-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199904150-00005
  32. Gallagher S, Marras WS. Tolerance of the lumbar spine to shear: a review and recommended exposure limits. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27(10):973-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.08.009
  33. Hogan DA, Greiner BA, O'Sullivan L. The effect of manual handling training on achieving training transfer, employee's behaviour change and subsequent reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Ergonomics. 2014;57(1):93-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.862307
  34. Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R. Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs Part 2: Loading of the sacroiliac joints when lifting in a stooped posture. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1993;8(6):295-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(93)90003-Z
  35. Hodges PW, Sapsford R, Pengel LH. Postural and respiratory functions of the pelvic floor muscles. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(3):362-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20232
  36. Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Changes in intra-abdominal pressure during postural and respiratory activation of the human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000;89(3):967-76. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.3.967