한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제41권5호
  • /
  • Pages.391-400
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

COVID-19으로 인해 촉발된 원격 실험 수업에 대한 과학교육 전문가들의 인식

Science Education Experts' Perception of the Remote Laboratory Sessions Provoked by COVID-19

  • 투고 : 2021.08.10
  • 심사 : 2021.11.02
  • 발행 : 2021.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 COVID-19으로 인해 촉발된 원격 실험 수업에 대한 과학교육 전문가들의 인식을 조사하였다. 2021년 상반기에 물리교육, 화학교육, 생물교육, 지구과학교육 전문가 총 10인에 대한 반구조화된 질적 인터뷰를 수행하였다. 연구 결과, 과학교육 전문가들은 우선 원격 실험 수업을 예비교사교육의 일환으로서 이해하였으며 이를 통하여 기존에 관습적으로 진행되어 왔던 실험 교육의 목적을 재인식하게 되었다고 응답하였다. COVID-19으로 인한 원격 수업 실험의 현실에 관하여는 우선 핸즈온 경험의 부족으로 인한 학습 결손, 교수자 및 학습자의 상호작용 감소 우려, 교수자의 업무량 증가가 언급되었다. 그럼에도 불구하고 과학교육 전문가들은 원격 실험 수업의 적응적 실행 경험을 통해 이를 개선하기 위한 구체적인 방안들을 제시하기도 하였으며, 포스트 코로나 시대의 과학교육의 방향성을 제안하였다. 이에 연구자들은 원격 실험 수업을 핸즈온 수업의 미비한 방식이라기보다는 마인즈온 수업의 보완된 방식으로 이해할 때 이를 더 나은 형태로 설계 및 실행할 수 있는 가능성이 열릴 수 있다고 제안하고, 이와 관련한 추후 연구 주제를 제시하였다. 본 연구는 원격 실험 수업을 과학교육학의 관점에서 보다 심도 있게 이해할 수 있는 단서를 제공한다는 의의를 지닌다.

This study investigated science education experts' perception of remote laboratory sessions (RLS) provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a total of 10 semi-structured interviews with experts in physics, chemistry, biology, and earth science education. As a result, science education experts primarily understood the RLS concerning pre-service teacher education and reconsidered the aim and goal of conventional laboratory education. On practices of RLS provoked by the COVID-19, they pointed out the learning loss due to deficiency of hands-on experience, decreased interactions between instructor and students, and instructors' increased burden. Meanwhile, they contemplated upon their adaptive implementation of RLS to suggest ways to improve RLS instruction and directions of post-COVID-19 science education. We recommend that RLS should be understood as a complemented version of minds-on teaching rather than a degraded version of hands-on teaching to elicit its full potentials. This study has its own significance providing an in-depth science educational perspective interpreting the RLS phenomena.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
  2. Baek, J., Jeong, D. H., & Hwang, S. (2014). Issues and effects in developing inquiry-based argumentation task for science teachers: A case of Charles' law experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.2.0079
  3. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.
  4. Blizak, D., Blizak, S., Bouchenak, O., & Yahiaoui, K. (2020). Students' perceptions regarding the abrupt transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case of faculty of chemistry and hydrocarbons at the University of Boumerdes-Algeria. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2466-2471. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00668
  5. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 543-547. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543
  7. Erduran, S. (2021). Science education and the pandemic, 1 year on: Emergence of new conceptual tools and re-calibration of existing educational approaches. Science & Education, 30, 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730300405
  8. Flick, L. B. (1993). The meanings of hands-on science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628851
  9. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1965.12.4.03a00070
  10. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  11. Jang, W., Choi, M., & Hong, H. -G. (2020). A case study on the operation of non-face-to-face experimental class at university with COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 937-966. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.17.937
  12. Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham-Shum, S. J., & Carr, C. S. (Eds.). (2012). Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-making. Springer Science & Business Media.
  13. Lee, G. -G., Jeon, Y. -E., & Hong, H. -G. (2021). The effects of cooperative flipped learning on science achievement and motivation in high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1381-1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1917788
  14. Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students' sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
  15. Lee, J. -H., Yuo, K., Park, J., Yoon, H. -G., Park, H. -H., & Lee, S. -K. (2021). Implications of scientific practices on science education from the actor-network theory perspective: Focusing on the concept of 'circulating reference'. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 25(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2021.25.2.133
  16. Lee, L., & Kim, H. -B. (2021). Exploring science teacher agency as agent of change: The case of distance learning practice due to COVID-19. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(3), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2021.41.3.237
  17. Loveys, B. R., & Riggs, K. M. (2019). Flipping the laboratory: Improving student engagement and learning outcomes in second year science courses. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1533663
  18. Lowe, D., Newcombe, N., & Stumpers, B. (2013). Evaluation of the use of remote laboratories for secondary school science education. Reserach in Science Education, 43(3), 1197-1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9304-3
  19. Ma, J., & Nickerson (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Survey, 38(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132952.1132953
  20. Mayer, R. E., Florella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 837-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6
  21. Park, M., Lee, J., Lee, G., & Song, J. (2007). Conceptual definition and types of reflective thinking on science teaching: Focus on the pre-service science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(1), 70-83.
  22. Petillion, R. J., & McNeil, W. S. (2020). Student experiences of emergency remote teaching: Impacts of instructor practice on student learning, engagement, and well-Being. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2486-2493. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00733
  23. Ray, S., & Srivastava, S., (2020). Virtualization of science education: A lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Proteins and Proteomics, 11, 77-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42485-020-00038-7
  24. Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD. Retrieved on April 14th, 2020 from https://oecd.dam-broadcast.com/pm_7379_126_126988-t63lxosohs.pdf
  25. Reiss, M. J. (2020). Science education in the Light of COVID-19. Science & Education, 29(4), 1079-1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00143-5
  26. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Routledge.
  27. Siry, C. (2020). Science education during times of crisis: Calling for reflections, responses, and forward thinking from the CSSE community. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09985-5
  28. Tho, S. W., Yeung, Y. Y., Wei, R., Chan, K. W., & So, W. W. M. (2017). A systematic review of remote laboratory work in science education with the support of visualizing its structure through the HistCite and CiteSpace software. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(7), 1217-1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9740-z
  29. UNESCO (2021, June 23). Education: From disruption to recovery. Retrieved on June 23rd, 2021 from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
  30. Yoo, M. -H., Yoon, H., & Hong, H. -G. (2007). The effect of small-scale chemistry(SSC) lab program on science-majored student's academic self-efficacy and science-related affective domain in high school chemistry I classes. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 51(5), 1-16.
  31. Verma, G., Campbell, T., & Park, B. -Y. (2020). Science teacher education in the times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(5), 483-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1771514