DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Analysis of Structure and Type of the Reading Programs in the Secondary School Library by Modulized Educational Activities

교육 활동의 모듈화를 통한 중등 학교도서관 독서 프로그램의 구조와 유형 분석에 관한 연구

  • 소병문 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2021.10.18
  • Accepted : 2021.11.15
  • Published : 2021.11.30

Abstract

The aim of this study is to classify the structure levels and types of the reading program in the secondary school library. The object of analysis is the practice case of the reading program included in 'Occupying School Library by 1318 Bookworms' for recently 10 years. There are 375 cases. According to the analysis result, most of the reading programs have three layers made up of 'blend title- reading activities- educational activities'. And there are classified into eight types (lecture, viewing, presentation, exhibition, making sth, debating, answering a quiz, experience) of the reading activities. The type of reading program depend on how to combine to the educational activities(reading, writing, listening, watching, speaking, making). This attribute of educational activities match up with modularity, completeness itself and organizing system. Through modular process of educational activities, it's possible to design their own reading programs based on the reading activity by adding, compensating other educational activities.

이 연구의 목적은 중등 학교도서관 독서 프로그램의 층위 구조를 밝히고, 교육 활동을 중심으로 유형화하는 것이다. 이에 국립어린이청소년도서관의 청소년독서문화진흥 사업인 '1318 책벌레들의 도서관 점령기'에 수록된 최근 10년간 전국 375개교 독서 프로그램의 운영사례를 분석하였다. 대다수 중등 학교도서관의 독서 프로그램은 '브랜드 명칭-독서 활동-교육 활동'의 층위 구조로 이뤄졌으며, '독서 활동'의 내용에 따라 강의형, 관람형, 발표형, 전시형, 제작형, 토론형, 퀴즈형, 체험형 등으로 분석되었다. 이들 유형은 읽기, 쓰기, 듣기, 보기, 말하기, 만들기와 같은 '교육 활동'의 조합에 따라 결정되며, '교육 활동'은 모듈과 같이 자기완결성이 있어 전제 시스템을 구성할 수 있다. 이렇게 모듈화된 '교육 활동'은 대상 도서 읽기 활동을 중심으로 독서 과정에 추가, 보완돼 독서 프로그램으로 실현된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Jihei & Cha, Sungjong (2020). A study on evaluation of the reading culture promotion project and development direction of smart era at the National Library for Children and Young Adults. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 31(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2020.31.2.203
  2. Institute of School Library in the Kongju National University (2015). Practice and Theory of the Reading Program. Daegu: Taeilsa.
  3. National Library for Children and Young Adults (2009). Practice Casebook of Occupation School Library by 1318 Bookworms.
  4. National Library for Children and Young Adults (2020). Practice Casebook of Occupation School Library by 1318 Bookworms.
  5. Ministry of Education (2019). The 3rd Primary Plan for Promoting the School Library.
  6. Kim, Yongcheol, Gong, Jungja, Byeon, Wooyeol, Lui, Soyoung, Lee, Sungae, Jung, Eahee, Han, Yunok, Ham, Myoungsik, & Hwang, Geumsuk (2003). School Library and Reading Education. Daegu: Taeilsa.
  7. Kim, Jongsung & Um, Mijin (2010). A study on the typological characteristics of young adults programs in public libraries and its solutions for development. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 21(2), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2010.21.2.039
  8. Kim, Hyojung, Kim, Seunghwan, Han, Bokhee, & Song, Youngsuk (1999). Practice and theory of the reading education. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  9. Byeon, Wooyeol (2015). Understanding of Reading Education (revised edition). Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  10. Son, Jungpyo (2015). New Methodology in Reading Instruction (3rd revised and enlarged edition). Daegu: Taeilsa.
  11. Yun, Yura & Lee, Eunjoo (2020). Design of reading and discussion activities using recommended book list. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.51.3.202009.325
  12. Lee, Kyounghwa & Song, Giho (2019). An analysis of program types for school reading education included in the 100 excellent curriculum by multiple intelligences. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.1.201903.85
  13. Lee, Byeongki (2008). A study on the categorization of reading strategies for reading instruction in school library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(3), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.3.200809.139
  14. Lee, Soonyoung & Song, Jung Yoon (2012). A study on the current reading programs of middle school libraries. Journal of Reading Research, 20, 290-318.
  15. Lee, Soonyoung, Choi, Sookki, Kim, Joohwan, Suh, Hyuk, & Park, Youngmin (2015). Reading Education. Seoul: Sahoipyeongronacademy.
  16. Lee, Soonyoung (2019). Understanding readers and non readers: focusing on terms, status, characteristics, and formation conversion. Korean Journal of Literacy Research, 10(6), 357-384.
  17. Jung, Jaeyoung (2014). Composition and operation of the modular classic reading programs. the Korea Association of General Education Academic Conference Manual, 511-523.
  18. Jung, Changwoo, Choi, Wonhee, Kim Jinyoung, Mun, Ilho, Park, Heungin, Park, Jungyoon, Park, Yongwoo, Jun, Jungjae, Shin, Jongsup, Han, Kyounghwa, Park, Jaehyun, Lee, Jueun, & Kim, yunjung (2018). Integrated Society. Seoul: Mirae-en.
  19. Cha, Sungjong, Bae, Kyungjea, & Kang, Jihei (2019). An empircal study on the reading culture promotion project of the National Library for Children and Young Adults. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 273-303. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.4.201912.273
  20. Korean Library Association (2013). Korean Library Standard. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  21. Han, Sanghwan (2001). Direction of School Library Policy in a Knowledge-based Society. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
  22. Hwang, Geumsuk, Lee, kyeongmin, An, Inja. Choi, Soonhee, & Kim, Sookyeong (2016). Practice of Reading Culture Program Based on NCD. Daegu: Taeilsa.
  23. Hwang, Geumsuk & Kim, Sookyeong (2020). Practice and Theory of the Reading Instruction. Daegu: Taeilsa.
  24. Hwang, Eunkyung & Hong, Seongyoun (2018). A study on general chemistry instruction based on module system for humanities students. Journal of General Education 8, 59-81. https://doi.org/10.24173/jge.2018.12.8.3