DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of Perceived CSR Motives of Fashion Consumer on Sincerity, Trust, and Behavioral Intention -Focus on the Effects of CSR Timing and Information Source-

패션 소비자의 CSR 동기 지각이 진실성, 신뢰, 행동 의도에 미치는 영향 -CSR 지속성과 정보원의 효과를 중심으로-

  • Ahn, Soo-kyung (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Ryou, Eunjeong (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Changwon National University)
  • Received : 2021.09.06
  • Accepted : 2021.10.22
  • Published : 2021.11.30

Abstract

With the growing importance of CSR, more fashion brands have actively engaged in CSR activities, and consumers' perception of their motives has become a critical issue. This study investigates the influence of perceived CSR motives on fashion consumers' perceived sincerity, trust, and behavioral intentions. In addition, the effect of 'CSR timing' and 'information source' on these variables was examined. In a 2×2 between- subjects design with scenarios, 515 adult consumers responded to an online survey questionnaire. The study identified three CSR motives: value-driven motive, instrumental motive, and strategic motive. The SEM results showed that the value-driven and instrumental motives influenced trust and behavioral intentions. In particular, perceived sincerity mediates value-driven motive and trust. A comparison of latent means revealed the effect of CSR timing on value-driven and strategic motives, trust, sincerity, and behavioral intentions. This study provides an insight into the relationship between consumers' perception of CSR motives and their reactions, and the importance of CSR timing.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. (2016). Consumer ethics and fashion corporate social responsibility-attributions of fashion CSR motives and perceptions. Journal of Fashion Business, 20(6), 1-18. doi:10.12940/jfb.2016.20.6.1
  2. Ahn, S., & Ryou, E. (2011). Corporate social responsibility -Contents analysis of Korean fashion corporations' websites-. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(4), 455-465. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2011.35.4.455
  3. Ahn, S., & Ryou, E. (2013). CSR expectation from fashion firms and its impact on brand equity. Fashion and Textiles Research Journal, 15(1), 73-83. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.1.073
  4. An, D., Wang, C., & Jeon, P. (2018). A comparative analysis of CSR authenticity between proactive and reactive CSR under corporate crisis: Moderating roles of company-cause fit and the firm's prior reputation. The Journal of Korea International Trade Institute, 14(1), 585-602. doi:10.16980/jitc.14.1.201802.585
  5. Bae, J., & Cameron, G. (2006). Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144-150. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.007
  6. Becker-Olson K., Cudmore B., & Hill R. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
  7. Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24. doi:10.2307/41166284
  8. Brown, T., & Dacin, P. (1997). The company and product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84. doi:10.1177/002224299706100106
  9. Byrne, B., Shavelson, R., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
  10. Campbell, M., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69-83. doi:10.1086/314309
  11. Carroll, A. (1979). A Three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. doi:10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
  12. Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  13. Cho, J. (2013). Effects of the perception of fit and consistency on the consumers' evaluation of CSR: Based on structural relationships. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 24(8), 277-299. doi:10.14377/KJA.2013.11.30.277
  14. Choi, K., Hwang, S., & An, D. (2020). A study on the effects of motivation and attributes of corporate CSR activities on CSR authenticity and corporate attitude. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 23(2), 97-115. doi:10.17961/jdmr.23.03.202006.97
  15. Choi, M. (2012). Brand attitude formation according to consumers' cognition of CSR fit and CSR motivation. Journal of the Korean Society of Fashion Design, 12(1), 75-92.
  16. Choi, M., & Sung, H. (2013). A study on social responsibility practices of fashion corporations. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 22(1), 167-179. doi:10.5934/KJHE.2013.22.1.167
  17. Choi, M., & Yoon, N. (2010). Perceived motivation of corporate social responsibility to fashion brand and consumer-brand relationship building. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 48(6), 119-132. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 40(2), 26-40. doi:10.6115/khea.2010.48.6.119
  18. Chung, K., & Lee, Y. (2016). Korean fashion companies' strategic CSR implementation with focus on incorporation of consumers' CSR expectations. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 40(1), 26-40. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2016.40.1.26
  19. Creyer, E., & Ross Jr, W. (1997). Tradeoffs between price and quality: How a value index affects. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31(2), 280-302. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.1997.tb00392.x
  20. Ellen, P., Webb, D., & Mohr, L. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157. doi:10.1177/0092070305284976
  21. Forehand, M., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349-356. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_15
  22. Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19. doi:10.1177/002224299405800201
  23. Gilbert, D., & Malone, P. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21-38. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
  24. Graafland, J. & Ven van de, B. (2006). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 111-123. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2006.su.00012
  25. Groza, M., Pronschinske, M., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639-652. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0834-9
  26. Gu, H., & Morrison, P. (2009). An examination of the formation of consumer CSR association: When corporate social responsible initiatives are effective. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 68-75.
  27. Gustafssonn, C. (2005). Trust as an instance of asymmetrical reciprocity: An ethics perspective on corporate brand management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(2), 142-150. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00398.x
  28. Hong, S., Malik, M., & Lee, M. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-Western sample. Educational and psychological measurement, 63(4), 636-654. doi:10.1177/0013164403251332
  29. Johnson, D., & Grayson, K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 500-507. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00140-1
  30. Ju, S., & Chung, M. (2015). Evaluation of corporate social responsibility activities for fashion company's sustainable management - On the moderating effects of consumers' perceived fit and motivation. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 23(4), 644~660. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2015.23.4.644
  31. Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203-217. doi: org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.00
  32. Ku, Y. (2016). A study on the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility mediating effects of CSR authenticity and perceived CSR motives (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea university, Seoul, Korea.
  33. Kwon, G., & Jeong, S. (2013). CSR effect by exposure to prior information: an application of attribution theory, the persuasion knowledge model, and priming theory. Kookmin Social Science Reviews, 26(1), 129-154.
  34. Lee, H. (2007). The impact of the perceptions of corporate philanthropy motivation on attitude toward corporation. Korean Nonprofit Organization Research, 6(2), 285-310.
  35. Lee, H., & Park, J. (2009). The effects of corporate social responsibility activities on product and corporate evaluation: The mediating role of trust. Korea Marketing Review, 24(1), 231-250.
  36. Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2013). The influence of fashion company's CSR on consumer's purchase intention - Based on the mediating effect of ethical consumerism -. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 18(3), 1-28.
  37. Lee, J., & Shin, S. (2011). Impact of the perceived fit of a fashion company's CSR activities on the recommendation and purchasing intention of consumers. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 35(7), 816-827. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2011.35.7.816
  38. Lichtenstein, D., Drumwright, M., & Braig, B. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported non-profits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726
  39. Lim, S., & Park, J. (2012). The effects of the perceived motivation type toward corporate social responsibility activities on corporate evaluation. Korean Business Review, 5(3), 121-139.
  40. Mohr, L., & Webb, D. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121-147. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00006.x
  41. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 81-101. doi: 10.1177/002224299305700106
  42. Na, Y. (2016). The effect of fashion company's CSR efforts on the social relationship and pro-social consumption behavior. Journal of Fashion Business, 20(1), 17-34. doi: org/10.12940/jfb.2016.20.1.17
  43. Overton, H., Kim, J., Zhang, N., & Huang, S. (2021). Examining consumer attitudes toward CSR and CSA messages. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102095. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102095
  44. Park, J., & Ryu, G. (2012). The effects of corporate ability and social responsibility associations on customer attitudes: The mediating role of credibility-and benevolence-based trust. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 27(1), 1-25.
  45. Park, S., Koo, D., & Kang, B. (2012). Consumers' attributions, perception, and responses on CSR activities. Korean Management Review, 41(2), 173-200.
  46. Price, L., Arnould, E., & Deibler, S. (1995). Consumers' emotional responses to service encounters: The influence of the service provider. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(3), 4-63. doi:10.1108/09564239510091330
  47. Scheinbaum, A., Lacey, R., & Liang, M. (2017). Communicating corporate responsibility to fit consumer perceptions: how sincerity drives event and sponsor outcomes. Journal of Advertising Research, 57(4), 410-421. doi: 10.2501/JAR-2017-049
  48. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-244. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838
  49. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158-166. doi:10.1177/0092070305284978
  50. Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831-1838. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004
  51. Steenkamp, J., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-90. doi:10.1086/209528
  52. Tao, W., & Ferguson, M. (2015). The overarching effects of ethical reputation regardless of CSR cause fit and information source. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(1), 23-43. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2014.954285
  53. The Federation of Korean Industries. (2020). 2020 기업.기업재단 사회공헌백서 [Corporate community relations white book 2020]. Seoul: Author.
  54. Vlachos, P., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A., & Avramidis, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170-180. doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0117
  55. Vukovic, A., Miletic, L., Curcic, R., & Nicic, M. (2020). Consumers' perception of CSR motives in a post- socialist society: The case of Serbia. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(3), 528-543. doi:10.1111/beer.12271
  56. Wagner, T., Lutz, R., & Weitz, B. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77-91. doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
  57. Xie, Y., & Peng, S. (2011). How do corporate associations influence customer relationship strength? The effects of different types of trust. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(5), 443-454. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2011.565882
  58. Yoon, Y., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377-390. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9