International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A quantitative methodology for evaluating the ship stability using the index for marine ship intact stability assessment model

  • IM, Nam-Kyun (Division of Navigation Science, Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • CHOE, Hun (Department of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • Received : 2020.08.21
  • Accepted : 2021.01.12
  • Published : 2021.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

IMO stability regulations include various stability parameters such as GM values. To assess the stability of the ships, we should check all stability parameters of the IMO requirements. However, since this process is complex, a more convenient way to evaluate stability performance is required. In this research, the index for marine ship intact stability assessment (IMSISA) model was developed to solve these problems. The IMSISA model consists of a stability index calculation module and a stability assessment module. In the stability index calculation module, ten stability parameters, including GM, were used to develop the stability index, which has the advantage of being able to quantify the ship stability. The stability assessment module uses the stability index value to determine the stability status of the ship and provides the captain with stability management guidelines. To verify the proposed model, the basic stability calculations were performed for two model ships in 32 loading situations. The proposed model was found to provide better performance in the stability assessment than the previous study. By applying the IMSISA model to the ships, the captain can assess the ship stability more quantitatively and efficiently.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of South Korea grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2020R1F1A1050113).

References

  1. Alvarez Santullano, F.M., Souto-Iglesias, A., 2014. Stability, safety and operability of small fishing vessels. Ocean Eng. 79, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.01.011
  2. Andrei, C., 2017. A proposed new generation of intact stability criteria for assessment of ship stability in longitudinal waves. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 227, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012005
  3. Andrei, C., Blagovest, B., 2013. A proposed criterion for the assessment of the parametric rolling of ships in longitudinal waves. J. Maritime Transport and Engineering 2 (2), 4-13.
  4. Andrei, C., Lamba, M., Pazara, R., 2015. A proposed criterion for assessment the pure loss of stability of ships in longitudinal waves. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D: Mech. Eng. 77, 83-96.
  5. Ariffin, A., Laurens, J.M., Mansor, S., 2016. Real-time Evaluation of Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria.
  6. Belenky, V., Bassler, C., Spyrou, K., 2011. Development of Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria.
  7. Brown, D., Witz, J., 1996. Estimation of vessel stability at sea using roll motion records. Transactions of the R.I.N.A 139, 130-146.
  8. Caamano, L.S., Gonzalez, M.M., Casas, V.D., 2018. On the feasibility of a real time stability assessment for fishing vessels. Ocean Eng. 159, 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.002
  9. Chung, J., Shin, D., Kim, W., Moon, B., 2020. Current status of the 2nd generation of intact stability: investigation of the pure loss of stability and parametric roll mode. J. Ocean Eng. Technol. 34, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.26748/ksoe.2019.047
  10. Deakin, B., 2006. Developing Simple Safety Guidance for Fishermen.
  11. Deakin, B., 2010. Collating evidence for a universal method of stability assessment or guidance. The International Journal of Maritime Engineering 152, 85-91.
  12. Deybach, F., 1997. Intact Stability Criteria for Naval Ships.
  13. Francescutto, A., 2016. Intact stability criteria of ships - past, present and future. Ocean Eng. 120, 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.030
  14. Goldberg, L.L., Sarchin, T.H., 1962. Stability and buoyancy criteria for u.s. naval surface ships. Trans.Am.Soc.Nav.Arch. Mar.Eng. 70, 418-458.
  15. Gonzalez, M.M., Casas, V.D., Caamano, L.S., 2016. Real-time stability assessment in mid-sized fishing vessels.
  16. Hasanudin, Chen, J.H., 2015. Modification of the intact stability criteria to assess the ship survivability from capsizing. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 14. In: The 2nd International Seminar on Ocean and Coastal Engineering, Environment and Natural Disaster Management, pp. 64-75, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2015.07.086
  17. Hu, Y., Tang, J., Xue, S., Liu, S., 2015. Stability criterion and its calculation for sailassisted ship. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 7, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0001
  18. Im, N.K., Hwang, S.J., Choe, H., 2018. Development of stability index for vessel operators support system. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment and Safety 24, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.1.001
  19. IMO, 1968. Recommendation on intact stability for passenger and cargo ships under 100 meters in length. Resolution A 167 (ES.IV).
  20. IMO, 1985. Recommendation on a Severe Wind and Rolling Criterion (Weather Criterion) for the Intact Stability of Passenger and Cargo Ship of 24 Metres in Length and over Resolution A, 562 (14).
  21. IMO, 1993. Code of intact stability for all ships covered by imo instruments. Resolution A 749 (18).
  22. IMO, 2008. Code of intact stability for all ships covered by imo instruments. Resolution MSC 267 (85).
  23. IMO, 2015. Information collected by the correspondence group on intact stability regarding second generation intact stability criteria SDC 3. Int. News Fats, Oils Relat. Mater. (INF) 10.
  24. IMO, 2016. Finalization of Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria SDC 3/WP.5.
  25. ITTC, 2017. Recommended Procedure and Guidelines - Predicting Powering Margins (7.5-02-03-01.5) Revision 02.
  26. Kobylinski, L., 1975. Rational stability criteria and the probability of capsizing. In: Proceeding (1st) of Theinternational Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, pp. 1-4.
  27. Kobylinski, L., 2009. Future Generation Stability Criteria - Prospects and Possibilities.
  28. Magnussen, A.K., 2017. Rational Calculation of Sea Margin, Master Thesis. Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
  29. Manderbacka, T., Themelis, N., Backalov, I., Boulougouris, E., Eliopoulou, E., Hashimoto, H., Konovessis, D., Leguen, J.F., Gonzalez, M.M., Rodriguez, C.A., Rosen, A., Ruponen, P., Shigunov, V., Schreuder, M., Terada, D., 2019. An over-view of the current research on stability of ships and ocean vehicles: the stab2018 perspective. Ocean Eng. 186, 106090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.072
  30. Mantari, J., Silva, S., Guedes Soares, C., 2011. Intact stability of fishing vessels under combined action of fishing gear, beam waves and wind. Ocean Engineering - OCEAN ENG 38.
  31. Marutheri Parambath, J.I., 2019. Development of Intact Stability Weather Criterion Applicable to River-Sea Vessels. unpublished master's thesis).
  32. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2016. Criteria of the Ship Stability, pp. 16-88.
  33. MMGonzalez, P.C.S., Alvarez, R.T., Casas, V.D., Lopez, A.M., Pena, F.L., 2012. Fishing vessel stability assessment system. Ocean Eng. 41, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.12.021
  34. Pierrottet, E., 1935. Standards of stability for ships. Trans.Inst.Nav.Archit. 77, 208-222.
  35. Rahola, J., 1939. The Judging of the Stability of Ships and the Determination of the Minimum Amount of Stability Especially Considering the Vessels Navigating Finnish Waters. Ph.D. thesis. Technical University of Finland, Helsinki.
  36. Rea, L.M., Parker, R.A., 2014. Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide: A Comprehensive Guide. John Wiley & Son.
  37. Terada, D., Tamashima, M., Nakao, I., Matsuda, A., 2018. Estimation of metacentric height using onboard monitoring roll data based on time series analysis. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 24.
  38. Tompuri, M., Ruponen, P., Lindroth, D., 2016. Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria and Operational Limitations in Initial Ship Design.
  39. Umeda, N., Francescutto, A., 2016. Current state of the second generation intact stability critera - achievements and remaining issues. In: Proceeding of the 15th International Ship Stability Workshop.
  40. Umeda, N., Maki, A., Izawa, S., Sano, H., 2009. New generation intact stability criteria: a step forward. Proceeding of the 10th international Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles 129-139.
  41. Unit, Wolfson, 2005. Mca Research Project 509. Hsc - 'evaluation of Existing Criteria'.
  42. Unit, Wolfson, 2006. Mca Research Project 560. Simplified Presentation of Fishing Vessels Stability Information for Vessels 12 M Registered Length and over. Phase 2 Final Report.
  43. Yamagata, M., 1959. Standard of stability adopted in Japan. Trans. Inst. Nav. Architects 101, 417-443.

Cited by

  1. Indicators of the critical state of the ship’s stability vol.2131, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2131/5/052057