The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pre-service Elementary School Teachers' Perceptions on Instructional Design: Based on Lesson Plan Analysis

예비초등교사의 교수설계에 대한 인식: 수업지도안 분석을 중심으로

  • Kwon, Hyuk-il (Dept. of Education, Cheongju National Univ. of Education)
  • 권혁일 (청주교육대학교 교육학과)
  • Received : 2021.09.30
  • Accepted : 2021.10.18
  • Published : 2021.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study intended to identify the differences of pre-service elementary school teachers' perceptions on instructional design between face-to-face and online instruction. Lesson plans for face-to-face and online instruction were analyzed by 84 participants who were seniors at C university of education. Results of content analysis indicate that 'Providing Learning Guidance' domain is the biggest domain in terms of the frequency gap between face-to-face and online instruction. Frequency differences by domains between face-to-face and online instruction were found to be significant as a result of Chi-square test. Frequency differences by instructional elements in the 'Providing Learning Guidance' domain between face-to-face and online instruction were found to be statistically significant as well. In conclusion, this study indicates the differences of pre-service elementary school teachers' perceptions on instructional design between face-to-face and online instruction, which implies the necessity for the development and implementation of professional development programs focusing on the perceptions on instructional design of online instruction for pre-service elementary school teachers.

본 연구는 예비초등교사의 대면과 비대면 수업 간 교수설계에 대한 인식의 차이를 규명하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 대면과 비대면 수업지도안을 연구 참여자인 C교육대학교 4학년 재학 중인 예비초등교사 84명에게 분석토록 하고 내용분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과 대면과 비대면 수업지도안 간 분석내용의 빈도 차이가 가장 많은 영역은 '학습안내 제시' 영역인 것으로 나타났다. 카이스퀘어 검증 결과 대면과 비대면 수업지도안 간 영역 별 빈도 차이는 유의미한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 '학습안내 제시' 영역 내 교수요소 별 빈도분석을 실시한 결과 대면과 비대면 간 분석의 빈도 차이가 두드러지게 큰 교수요소는 '매체 및 테크놀로지 활용'과 '학습자와의 상호작용' 요소인 것으로 밝혀졌다. 대면과 비대면 수업지도안 간 '학습안내 제시' 영역 내의 교수요소별 빈도 차이 역시 통계적으로 유의미한 것으로 밝혀졌다. 결론적으로 본 연구의 결과는 예비초등교사의 대면과 비대면 수업의 교수설계에 대한 인식에는 차이가 있음을 나타내주는 것으로 향후 예비교사의 교사전문성 제고를 위해 특히 비대면 수업의 교수설계에 대한 인식에 초점을 맞춘 교사양성프로그램 개발과 운영의 필요성을 시사해준다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. W. Brown, "The Teacher-Tool Relationship: Theorizing the Design and Use of Curriculum Materials." In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction (pp. 17-36). Routledge: New York, 2009.
  2. M. D. Merrill, "First Principles of Instructional Design. ETR&D, Vol 50, No. 3, pp. 43-59, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
  3. H. Kwon, "Inservice and Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Awareness of Instructional Strategies," The Journal of Elementary Education, Vol. 25, No.1, pp. 123-146, 2012.
  4. S. Jin, J. Pang, & Y. Park, "What Teachers Consider Important in Lesson Design: Focusing on the Analysis of a Lesson Plan of Elementary Mathematics," J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed .Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education. Vol. 35, No.1, pp. 15-36, 2021.
  5. W. Dick, L. Cary, & J. Carey, "The Systematic Design of Instruction," Eighth Edition, Pearson, 2015.
  6. R. M. Gagne, L. J. Briggs, & W. W. Wager, "Principles of Instrudtional Design(4th ed.)," Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. 1992.
  7. D. H. Jonassen, "Designing Constructivist Learning Environments." In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II, (pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
  8. G. Kim & M. Jeon, "Exploring Teachers' Pedagogical Design Capacity: How Mathematics Teachers Plan and Design Their Mathematics Lessons," J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed .Ser. A: Mathematics Education, Vol. 56, No.4, pp.365-385, 2017.
  9. H. Lee, S. Lee, H. Kim, & H. Park, "An Analysis of the Form and the Content of Elementary School Lesson Plan in Korea," The Journal of Elementary Education, Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 1-29, 2012.
  10. S. Kim, "Exploring Theoretical Aspects of Effective Lesson Planning," The Journal of Elementary Education, Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 97-115, 2012.
  11. H. I. Kwon, "Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Perceptions on TPACK," The Journal of Convergence on Culture Technology. Vol. 6 No. 4. pp. 339-345, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.4.339
  12. K. L. Gustafson, & R. M. Branch, "What Is Instructional Design?" In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey(Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (pp. 10-16). New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2007.
  13. J. W. Willis, "Constructivist Instructional Design: Foundations, Models, and Examples," NC: Information Age Publishing, 2009.
  14. S. E. Smaldino, D. L. Lowther, & J. D. Russell, "Instructional Technology and Media for Learning (9th ed.)," Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2008