References
- K. David and H. Berndt, 6G vision and requirements: Is there any need for beyond 5G?, IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 13 (2018), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2018.2848498
- Z. Zhang et al., 6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architecture, and key technologies, IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 14 (2019), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2019.2921208
- M. Jia et al., Intelligent resource management for satellite and terrestrial spectrum shared networking toward B5G, IEEE Wirel. Commun. 27 (2020), 54-61.
- The Federal Communications Commission, In the matter of expanding flexible use of the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz band, Report and Order FCC 20-22, 2020.
- J.-W. Lim et al., Interference mitigation technique for the sharing between IMT-Advanced and fixed satellite service, J. Commun. Networks 9 (2007), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCN.2007.6182835
- S. Aijaz, Effects of deploying IMT-Advanced systems on fixed satellite services in the 3,400-3,600 MHZ frequency band in Pakistan, in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Space Technol. (Islamabad, Pakistan), 2008, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAST.2008.4747676
- C. Zhang et al., Spatial spectrum sharing for satellite and terrestrial communication networks, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron Syst. 55 (2019), 1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2889585
- G. Hattab et al., Interference analysis of the coexistence of 5G cellular networks with satellite earth stations in 3.7-4.2GHz, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops (Kansas City, MO, USA), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCW.2018.8403528
- S. Kim et al., Coexistence of 5G with the incumbents in the 28 and 70 GHz bands, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 35 (2017), 1254-1268. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2017.2687238
- M. Hoyhtya et al., Database-assisted spectrum sharing in satellite communications: A survey, IEEE Access. 5 (2017), 25322-25341. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2771300
- Q. Zhang et al., Coexistence and performance limits for the cognitive broadband satellite system and mmWave cellular network, IEEE Access. 8 (2020), 51905-51917. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980580
- M. Haenggi, Stochastic geometry for wireless networks, Cambridge Univ, Cambridge, UK, 2013.
- H. Jin et al., Energy efficiency of ultra-dense small-cell networks with adaptive cell-breathing, IET Commun. 12 (2018), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2016.1420
- W. Lee, B. C. Jung, and H. Lee, ACEnet: Approximate thinning based judicious network control for energy-efficient ultra-dense networks, MDPI Energies 11 (2018), no. 5.1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051307
- E. Chu, J. M. Kim, and B. C. Jung, Interference modeling and analysis in 3-dimensional directional UAV networks based on stochastic geometry, Elsevier ICT Express 5 (2019), 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2019.09.006
- O. Y. Kolawole et al., On the performance of cognitive satellite-terrestrial networks, IEEE Trans. Cognit. Commun. Network. 3 (2017), no. 4, 668-683. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2017.2763619
- Z. Chen et al., Aggregate interference modeling in cognitive radio networks with power and contention control, IEEE Trans. Commun. 60 (2012), 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2011.012012.100426
- J. Wildman et al., On the joint impact of beamwidth and orientation error on throughput in directional wireless poisson networks, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 13 (2014), 7072-7085. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2014.2331055
- The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Study on New Radio (NR) to support non-terrestrial networks (Release 15), Tech. Report 38.811 v15.2.0, Sep. 2019.
- International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Attenuation by atmospheric gases, Recommendation ITU-R P.676-11, September 2016.