ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Combined time bound optimization of control, communication, and data processing for FSO-based 6G UAV aerial networks

  • Seo, Seungwoo (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ko, Da-Eun (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chung, Jong-Moon (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2020.05.14
  • Accepted : 2020.08.24
  • Published : 2020.11.16
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Because of the rapid increase of mobile traffic, flexible broadband supportive unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based 6G mobile networks using free space optical (FSO) links have been recently proposed. Considering the advancements made in UAVs, big data processing, and artificial intelligence precision control technologies, the formation of an additional wireless network based on UAV aerial platforms to assist the existing fixed base stations of the mobile radio access network is considered a highly viable option in the near future. In this paper, a combined time bound optimization scheme is proposed that can adaptively satisfy the control and communication time constraints as well as the processing time constraints in FSO-based 6G UAV aerial networks. The proposed scheme controls the relation between the number of data flows, input data rate, number of worker nodes considering the time bounds, and the errors that occur during communication and data processing. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme is very effective in satisfying the time constraints for UAV control and radio access network services, even when errors in communication and data processing may occur.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Sharma, D. Chadha, and V. Chandra, High-altitude platform for free-space optical communication: performance evaluation and reliability analysis, IEEE/OSA J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 8 (2016), 600-609. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.8.000600
  2. M. Mozaffari et al., A tutorial on uavs for wireless networks: applications, challenges, and open problems, IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutorials 21 (2019), 2334-2360. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2902862
  3. Z. Zhang et al., 6G wireless networks: vision, requirements, architecture, and key technologies, IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 14 (2019), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2019.2921208
  4. M. A. Esmail, H. Fathallah, and M. Alouini, Channel modeling and performance evaluation of FSO communication systems in fog, In Proc. int. Conf. Telecommun. (Thessaloniki, Greece), 2016, pp. 1-5.
  5. S. Song et al., Analysis of wireless backhaul networks based on aerial platform technology for 6g systems, CMC Comput. Materials Continua. 62 (2020), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2020.09052
  6. S. Chandrasekharan et al., Designing and implementing future aerial communication networks, IEEE Commun. Mag. 54 (2016), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.7470932
  7. N. Wang, E. Hossain, and V. K. Bhargava, Backhauling 5G small cells: a radio resource management perspective, IEEE Wireless Commun. 22 (2015), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2015.7306536
  8. S. J. Lee et al., Development of autonomous flight control system for 50m unmanned airship, in Proc. Intell. Sens., Sens. Netw. Inf. Process. Conf. (Melbourne, Australia), 2004, pp. 457-461.
  9. R. La Scalea et al.Opportunities for autonomous UAV in harsh environments, in Proc. Int. Symp. Wireless Commun. Syst. (Oulu, Finland), 2019, pp. 227-232.
  10. M. A. Esmail, H. Fathallah, and M. S. Alouini, Outdoor FSO communications under fog: Attenuation modeling and performance evaluation, IEEE Photon. J. 8 (2016), 1-22.
  11. S. Wan et al., Towards big data processing in IoT: Path planning and resource management of UAV base stations in mobile-edge computing system, IEEE Internet Things J. 7 (2020), 5995-6009. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2954825
  12. J. Zhang, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, UAV-enabled radio access network: Multi-mode communication and trajectory design, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 66 (2018), 5269-5284. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2018.2866384
  13. G. Wang, L. Zhang, and W. Xu, What can we learn from four years of data center hardware failures?, in Proc. Annu. IEEE/IFIP Int. Conf. Dependable Syst. Netw. (Denver, CO, USA), 2017, pp. 25-36.
  14. S. Kavulya, et al., An analysis of traces from a production mapreduce cluster, in Proc. IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Cluster, Cloud Grid Comput. (Melbourne, Australia), 2010, pp. 94-103.
  15. Q. Zhang et al., Response delay optimization in mobile edge computing enabled UAV swarm, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 69 (2020), 3280-3295. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2020.2964821
  16. A. Asheralieva, and D. Niyato, Game theory and lyapunov optimization for cloud-based content delivery networks with device-to-device and UAV-enabled caching, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68 (2019), 10094-10110. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2934027
  17. J. Li, and Y. Han, A traffic service scheme for delay minimization in multi-layer UAV networks, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 67 (2018), 5500-5504. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2806625
  18. X. Wei et al., Joint optimization of energy consumption and delay in cloud-to-thing continuum, IEEE Internet Things J. 6 (2019), 2325-2337. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2906287
  19. J. Zhang et al., Stochastic computation offloading and trajectory scheduling for UAV-assisted mobile edge computing, IEEE Internet Things J. 6 (2018), 3688-3699. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2890133
  20. M. Koushik, and F. Hu, S. Kumar, Deep Q-learning-based node positioning for throughput-optimal communications in dynamic UAV swarm network, IEEE Trans. Cognitive Commun. Netw. 5 (2019), 554-566. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2019.2907520
  21. Z. Zhang et al., UAV-enabled multiple traffic backhaul based on multiple RNAs: A batch-arrival-queuing-inspired approach, IEEE Access 7 (2019), 161437-161448. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951603
  22. M. Zaharia et al., Discretized streams: Fault-tolerant streaming computation at scale, in Proc. ACM Symp. Oper. Syst. Principles (Farmington, PA), 2013, pp. 423-438.
  23. W. Li et al., Wide-area spark streaming: Automated routing and batch sizing, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 30 (2018), 1434-1448. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2018.2880189
  24. F. Luo et al., Stability of cloud-based UAV systems supporting big data acquisition and processing, IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 7 (2019), 866-877. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2017.2696529
  25. S. Sidhanta, W. Golab, and S. Mukhopadhyay, Deadline-aware cost optimization for spark, IEEE Trans. Big Data (2019), https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2019.2908188.
  26. J. Lee, B. Kim, and J. M. Chung, Time estimation and resource minimization scheme for apache spark and hadoop big data systems with failures, IEEE Access 7 (2019), 9658-9666. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891001
  27. M. Akkouchi, On the convolution of exponential distributions, J. Chungcheong Math. Soc. 21 (2008), 501-510.

Cited by

  1. The Intelligent Integration of Interactive Installation Art Based on Artificial Intelligence and Wireless Network Communication vol.2021, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3123317
  2. Optimization of the Online Teaching System Based on Streaming Media vol.2021, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5552168
  3. 6G and Internet of Things: a survey vol.8, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2021.1882350