DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Restructuring of human security practice model to improve practical utility: Focusing on the COVID-19 situation

실천적 유용성 향상을 위한 인간안보 실천모델의 재구성 : COVID-19 상황을 중심으로

  • 이성록 (한국복지대학교 사회복지학)
  • Received : 2020.11.02
  • Accepted : 2020.11.25
  • Published : 2020.11.30

Abstract

The recent COVID-19 pandemic is threatening human life and well-being, causing pain that has not been experienced before. Human security was summoned again as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is paradoxically a threat to human security due to its inherent limitations and authoritarian control model. This paper first raises the analytical rigor of the concept of human security, focusing on COVID-19. Based on this, the practical usefulness of human security is improved by constructing a practical model that reflects the human security issues raised in reality. In particular, we approach the COVID-19 pandemic not from a natural disaster, but from the perspective of an artificial catastrophe caused by immorality and division in the international community. At the same time, we propose a multilateralism governance model that reflects the perspective of emerging security in order to realize human rights, the fundamental value of human security, and quarantine, a practical task in a balanced way.

최근 COVID-19 팬데믹은 인류의 생명과 안녕을 위협하면서 이전에 경험하지 못했던 고통을 안겨주고 있다. COVID-19 팬데믹을 계기로 인간안보는 다시 소환되었다. 그러나 태생적 한계와 권위주의 통제모델에 의해 역설적으로 인간안보의 위협요인이 되고 있다. 먼저 이 논문은 먼저 COVID-19를 중심으로 인간안보 개념의 분석적 엄격성을 제고한다. 이를 토대로 현실적으로 제기된 인간안보 이슈들을 반영한 실천모델을 재구성함으로써 인간안보의 실천적 유용성을 향상시키고자 한다. 특히 COVID-19 팬데믹이 자연재해가 아닌 국제사회의 부도덕과 분열에 기인한 인위적 대재난이라는 관점에서 접근한다. 동시에 인간안보의 근본적 가치인 인권과 현실적 과제인 방역을 균형적으로 실현하기 위하여 신흥안보(emerging security) 관점을 반영한 다자주의 거버넌스모델(Multilateralism Governance Model)을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Human Security Collective, 2020, Human Security and COVID-19, 2020. 3. 27.
  2. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Human rights issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic.16
  3. UNDP, 1994, Human Development Report.
  4. Antonio Donini, Post-pandemic change? Humanitarian action and multilateralism in transnational times. United Against Inhumanity, 2020. 4. 20.
  5. Amnesty International, Explainer: Seven ways the coronavirus affects human rights, 5 February 2020, 23:02 UTC.
  6. EDPB(European Data Protection Board), Statement on the processing of personal data in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. Adopted on 19 March 2020.
  7. Odigbo. B, Eze. F, Odigbo.R, COVID-19 lockdown controls and human rights abuses: the social marketing implications. Emerald Open Research 2020, 2:45. https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13810.1
  8. OHCHR, COVID-19 Guidance, 2020. 3. 13.; OHCHR, TOPICS IN FOCUS EMERGENCY MEASURES AND COVID-19, 2020. 4. 27.
  9. UN Policy Brief, COVID-19 and Human Rights: We are all in this together, 2020. 4. 23.
  10. International IDEA, Democracy, human rights and the pandemic: impact and opportunities, 2020. 9. 21
  11. Hye-Jin Yang, Differences in depression and psychological emotions according to the degree of self-elasticity of college freshmen in COVID-19, The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT) Vol. 6, No. 3, pp.75-82, August 31, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.3.75
  12. Hong Jin Jeon, Depression and suicide, J Korean Med Assoc, 2011 April; 54(4): 370-375, DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2011.54.4.370
  13. Buzan, Barry (2007) People, states and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era. ECPR classics. (2nd).
  14. Biddle, N &Gray, M, The experience of volunteers during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, 2020. 5.
  15. Sangbae Kim, Emerging Security and Metagovernance: Theoretical Understanding of the New Security Paradigm, Korean Political Science Review 50(1), 2016.3, 75-104. https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2016.50.1.004
  16. Junghyun Yoon, Emerging Security Risks and Network Governance : Transnational Wicked Problems and Response Strategies in the Age of Uncertainty, Korean Political Science Review 54(4), 2020.9, 29-51(23 pages) https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2020.54.4.002
  17. Jessop, Bob. 2003. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  18. Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) Social Norms and Social Roles, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 96, No. 4, May, pp. 903-968 https://doi.org/10.2307/1123430
  19. Fukuda-Parr, S. and Hulme, D. 2011, "International Norm Dynamics and the "End of Poverty": Understanding the Millennium Development Goals." Global Governance, 17: 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01701002