The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in the Paradigm of Future International Order and Prospects for Security on the Korean Peninsula

미래 국제질서 패러다임 변화와 한반도 안보전망

  • 이웅 (대한민국 육군 미래혁신연구센터) ;
  • 정민섭 (대한민국 육군 미래혁신연구센터) ;
  • 박상혁 (우석대학교 군사학과)
  • Received : 2020.09.01
  • Accepted : 2020.09.28
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Currently, the nation's military is facing a real threat due to a reduction in military service resources and shorter service periods. Based on the military view that puts security first, the military tried to draw its impact and implications on the future army by reflecting the general objective content that the Ministry of National Defense and other government agencies and international agencies share. In other words, this study looks at the direction of the perception of mainstream perspectives (realism, liberalism) on international order, and presents the direction and framework for establishing future security strategies for the Korean Peninsula on the basis of military relevance that reflects the essential characteristics of military organizations contributing to national security on the theory and prospects of international order.

현재 우리나라 군대는 병역자원 감소 및 군 복무기간 단축으로 인한 현실적 위협으로 직면해 있는 환경에 처해있다. 안보를 최우선시하는 군사적 관점에 따라, 국방부를 비롯한 정부 기관 및 국제기관들이 인식을 같이 하고 있는 일반적으로 객관적인 내용 위주로 반영하여 미래 육군에 미치는 영향 및 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 즉, 본 연구는 국제질서를 바라보는 주류 관점(현실주의, 자유주의)의 인식 방향을 살펴보고, 국제질서 이론 및 전망에 대하여 국가안보에 기여하는 군 조직의 본질적 특성을 반영하는 군사적 합목적주의에 입각하여 한반도 미래 안보전략을 수립하는 방향과 큰 틀을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. John M. Owen, Ikenberry, international relations theory, and the rise of China, Political Studies Association, 2019.
  2. National Security Office, and Moon Jae-in, the government's national security strategy, p.12, 2018.
  3. Asan Institute for Policy Studies, "The Rise of Non-Liberal International Order," Issu Brief, p. 2. 2017.
  4. PwC, The Long View: How will the global economic order change by 2050, 2017.
  5. National Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, National Defense Science and Technology Level Survey Report, 2018.
  6. South Korea's Defense Ministry, pp. 19-33, 2019.
  7. George Friedman, The 21st Century Geographic Studies and the U.S. Defeat Strategy, (Seoul: Kim & Kim Books), 2018.
  8. Kim R. Holmes & James J. Przystup, eds., Between Diplomacy and Deterrence: Strategies for U.S. Relations with China (Washington D.C.: The Heritage Foundation), 1997.
  9. David Shambaugh, China's Future, Polity, 2016.
  10. Kenneth W.Allen, Dennis J. Blasko, John F. Corbett Jr.,"The PLA's New Organizational Structure: What is Known, Unknown and Speculation." China Brief. Vol 16, 2016.
  11. Seoul National University Institute of International Studies, "China's Rise and Domestic Political Limitation," p.103, 2017.
  12. Kwon Tae-hwan said, "Recent changes in Japan's security policy and South Korea's security strategy," (Recent seminar on the situation in Northeast Asia and South Korea's response strategy), 2018.
  13. Defense Research Institute, Defense Policy 2040: Prospects and Issues of Security Order in Northeast Asia, (Defense Research Institute), p.56, 2019.
  14. Institute of Strategic Studies, "2050 Paradigm for Transformation and Military Innovation of Strategic Environment," p.39, 2018.