Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Differences in Learning Capability according to the Demand and the Degree of Demand of Learning Program

학습 프로그램 수요 및 요구도에 따른 학습역량 차이연구

  • Choi, Mee Soon (Dept. of sport leisure industry, Sehan University) ;
  • Jo, Hye Young (Dept. of Early-Childhood Education, Sehan University)
  • 최미순 (세한대학교 스포츠레저산업학과) ;
  • 조혜영 (세한대학교 유아교육과)
  • Received : 2020.07.20
  • Accepted : 2020.11.06
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the differences in learning capability according to the demand of learning programs. The participants of this study included 1,738 S University students. The results of the study are as follows. First, in learning capability according to participation in learning programs, we found statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality. Second, there were no statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality in participating in learning programs. Third, there were statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality in not participating in learning programs. Fourth, there were statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness, self-improvement and sociality in experiencing difficulties in learning. Fifth, learning capabilities in specific areas that students wanted to improve had no statistically significant differences in the ability to organize information, resource utilization, self-awareness. However, there were statistically significant differences in self-improvement and sociality.

본 연구는 학습 프로그램 수요 및 요구도에 따른 학습역량 차이를 검증하는데 목적이 있다. 연구대상은 S대학교 재학 중인 1,738명이다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 학습 프로그램 참여에 따른 학습역량 차이는 정보구성능력, 자원활용 및 자아인식, 자기개선 및 사회성에서 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 둘째, 학습 프로그램에 참여하는 이유에 따른 학습역량 차이는 정보구성능력, 자원활용 및 자아인식, 자기개선 및 사회성은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 셋째, 학습 프로그램에 참여하지 않는 이유에 따른 학습역량 차이는 정보구성능력, 자원활용 및 자아인식, 자기개선 및 사회성은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 넷째, 학습의 어려운 점에 따른 학습역량 차이는 정보구성능력, 자원활용 및 자아인식, 자기개선 및 사회성은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 다섯째, 향상시키고 싶은 학습 분야에 따른 학습역량 차이를 알아본 결과 정보구성능력과 자원활용 및 자아인식은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타나지 않은 반면, 자기개선 및 사회성은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 역량중심 학습 프로그램 개발 시 기초자료를 제공하여 궁극적으로 학습역량 강화에 기여할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. OECD (2001). Investing competency for all communique. Meeting of OECD educational ministers. Paris: OECD.
  2. B. Gray, "Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration", Journal of Community and Applied Psychology, Vol.14, No.3, pp.166-176. May 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.773
  3. M. Gibbons, The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2002, Available From: http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132326892/pendidikan/maurice-gibbons-self-directed-learning-handbook-challenging-adolescent-students-excel-jossey-bass-20.pdf (accessed June. 22, 2020)
  4. E. T. Pascarella, & P. T. Terenzini, How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: John. Wiley and Sons, 2005.
  5. J. J. Heckman, J. Stixrud, & S. Urzua, "The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior", Journal of Labor Economics, Vol.24, No.3, pp.41-482. Spring 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/504455
  6. D. Leutner & E. Klieme, "Assessment of competencies", Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, Vol.216, No.2, pp.60-73. February 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.60
  7. D. Nusche, Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: Comparative review of selected practices. Paris: OECD Publications, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
  8. R. J. Shavelson, & L. Huang, "Responding responsibly. Change", The Magazine of Higher Learning, Vol.35, No.1, pp.10-19. March 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604739
  9. R. A. Bakoban, & S. A. Aljarallah, "Extracurricular activities and their effect on the student's grade point average: Statistical study", Educational Research and Reviews, Vol.10, No.20, pp.2737-2744. October 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2436
  10. M. Morgan, "The evolution of student services in the UK", Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, Vol.16, No.3, pp.77-84. August 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2011.652990
  11. Y. S. Noh, & S. S. Lee, "A study on developing and validating the instrument for diagnosing the competency of university students: A case study of D women's university", The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol.15, No.3, pp.273-305. August 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18211/kjhrdq.2013.15.3.011
  12. E. M. Sung, S. H. Jin, & G. H. Kim, "The development and validation of measurement tools for Korean youth lifelong learning competency", Studies on Korean Youth, Vol.27, No.3, pp.219-256. August 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14816/sky.2016.27.3.219
  13. H. K. Yang, "A study on the development of university student's learning competency scales". The Journal of Lifelong Education and HRD, Vol.12, No.1, pp.29-64. Aprile 2016.
  14. M. S. Coi, H. Y. Jo, & H. Y. Yi, "A validation study of the Korean educational performance indicator for new millennium learners: Focusing on S university students", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol.19, No.3, pp.309-335. February 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.3.309
  15. M. Kang, H. Heo, I. Jo, J. Shin, & J. Seo, "Developing an educational performance indicator for new millennium learners", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol.43, No.2, pp.157-170. December 2010.   DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782567
  16. T. Nunan, Student support as a factor affecting the quality of Australian distance education. Victoria, Australia. ERIC ED, 355, 419. November 1992.
  17. F. C. Lunenburg, "Extracurricular activities", Schooling, Vol.1, No.1, pp.1-4. September 2010.
  18. J. M. Lee, & G. J. Lee, "A study on the factors associated with self-directed learning ability of college students", Korean Journal of Educational Administration, Vol.35, No.3, pp.133-153. August 2017.
  19. M. S. Choi, D. S. Park, & H. Y. Jo, "The structural relationship among S university students' adjustment to college, sense of community and college life satisfaction: Multi-group analysis according to experience of center for teaching and learning's circle activities", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol.19, No.1, pp.491-510. January 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.1.491
  20. M. S. Choi, & H. Y. Jo, "The structural relationship among self-directed learning, college life satisfaction and academic self-efficacy of S university students: Multi-group analysis according to frequency of participation in self-directed learning programs of center for teaching and learning", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol.19, No.16, pp.701-720. August 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.16.701
  21. E. Massoni, "Positive effects of extra curricular activities on students", Essai, Vol.9, No.1, pp.83-87. 2011.
  22. A. M. White, & C. T. Gager, "Idle hands and empty pockets? Youth involvement in extracurricular activities, social capital, and economic status", Youth and Society, Vol.39, No.1, pp.75-111. July 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X06296906
  23. L. V. Morris, S. Wu, & C. Finnegan, "Predicting retention in online general education courses", The American Journal of Distance Education, Vol.19, No.1, pp.23-36. March 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1901_3
  24. P. R. Pintrich, & E. V. De Groot, "Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance", Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.82, No.1, pp.33-40. March 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  25. J. C. Dunlap, "Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession", Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol.53, No.1, pp.65-83. March 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02504858
  26. Y. S. Song, & K. H. Lee, "Effect of experience taking a creativity class on creativity and cognitive learning competence of college students", Global Creative Leader, Vol.2, No.2, pp.73-88. December 2012.
  27. D. J. Hacker, L. Bol, D. D. Horgan, & E. A. Rakow, "Test prediction and performance in a classroom context", Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.92, No.1, pp.160-170. March 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160
  28. J. Wood, S. Little, L. Goldring, & L. Jenkins, "The confidence to do things that I know nothing about- kills development through extracurricular inquiry activity", Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Vol.3, pp.2-21. March 2011.
  29. C. N. Park, & W. H. Chung, "Study on the effects of non-subject educational programs influencing the core competency of university students-focusing on the case of K university", Korean Journal of General Education, Vol.11, No.1, pp.39-71. February 2017.
  30. T. L. Parcel, & M. J. Dufur, "Capital at home and at school: Effects on child social adjustment", Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol.63, No.1, 32-47. February 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00032.x
  31. S. Nichols, "Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment", Cognition, Vol.84, No.2, pp.221-236. June 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00048-3
  32. Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.