Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics

The Korean Pediatric Society (대한소아청소년과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Health effects of electromagnetic fields on children

  • Moon, Jin-Hwa (Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2019.12.01
  • Accepted : 2020.05.07
  • Published : 2020.11.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In today's world, most children are exposed to various manmade electromagnetic fields (EMFs). EMFs are electromagnetic waves less than 300 GHz. A developing child's brain is vulnerable to electromagnetic radiation; thus, their caregivers' concerns about the health effects of EMFs are increasing. EMF exposure is divided into 2 categories: extremely low frequencies (ELFs; 3-3,000 Hz), involving high-voltage transmission lines and in-house wiring; and radiofrequencies (RFs; 30 kHz to 300 GHz), involving mobile phones, smart devices, base stations, WiFi, and 5G technologies. The biological effects of EMFs on humans include stimulation, thermal, and nonthermal, the latter of which is the least known. Among the various health issues related to EMFs, the most important issue is human carcinogenicity. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer's (IARC's) evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, ELFs and RFs were evaluated as possible human carcinogens (Group 2B). However, the World Health Organization's (WHO's) view of EMFs remains undetermined. This article reviews the current knowledge of EMF exposure on humans, specifically children. EMF exposure sources, biological effects, current WHO and IARC opinions on carcinogenicity, and effects of EMF exposures on children will be discussed. As well-controlled EMF experiments in children are nearly impossible, scientific knowledge should be interpreted objectively. Precautionary approaches are recommended for children until the potential health effects of EMF are confirmed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF2019R1F1A1058704) and research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2016).

References

  1. Kheifets L, Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer E. The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields. Pediatrics 2005;116:e303-13. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2541
  2. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2002;80:1-395.
  3. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2013;102(Pt 2):1-460.
  4. Stewart W. Mobile phones and health, report of independent expert group on mobile phones. Chilton (UK): IEGMP Secretariat, 2000.
  5. National Institute of Environmental Research [Internet]. Incheon (Korea): National Institute of Environmental Research; [cited 2019 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.nier.go.kr/NIER/cop/bbs/selectNoLoginBoardArticle.do.
  6. Markov M, Grigoriev Y. Protect children from EMF. Electromagn Biol Med 2015;34:251-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2015.1077339
  7. World Health Organization [Internet]. Electromagnetic fields and public health; exposure to extremely low frequency fields. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; [updated 2007 Jun; cited 2019 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs322/en/.
  8. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys 1998;74:494-522.
  9. Odaci E, Bas O, Kaplan S. Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus of rats: a stereological and histopathological study. Brain Res 2008;1238:224-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.013
  10. Bas O, Odaci E, Kaplan S, Acer N, Ucok K, Colakoglu S. 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposure affects qualitative and quantitative features of hippocampal pyramidal cells in the adult female rat. Brain Res 2009;1265:178-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.011
  11. Aldad TS, Gan G, Gao XB, Taylor HS. Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Sci Rep 2012;2:312. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00312
  12. Salford LG, Brun AE, Eberhardt JL, Malmgren L, Persson BR. Nerve cell damage in mammalian brain after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:881-3. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6039
  13. Schirmacher A, Winters S, Fischer S, Goeke J, Galla HJ, Kullnick U, et al. Electromagnetic fields (1.8 GHz) increase the permeability to sucrose of the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 2000;21:338-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-186X(200007)21:5<338::AID-BEM2>3.0.CO;2-Q
  14. Nittby H, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Malmgren L, Persson BR, Salford LG. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone. Pathophysiology 2009;16:103-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.001
  15. Maaroufi K, Save E, Poucet B, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H, Had-Aissouni L. Oxidative stress and prevention of the adaptive response to chronic iron overload in the brain of young adult rats exposed to a 150 kilohertz electromagnetic field. Neuroscience 2011;186:39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.003
  16. Kaplan S, Deniz OG, Onger ME, Turkmen AP, Yurt KK, Aydin I, et al. Electromagnetic field and brain development. J Chem Neuroanat 2016;75(Pt B):52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.11.005
  17. Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Erdal ME, Erdal N, Ay OI, Ay ME, et al. Effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on microRNA expression in brain tissue. Int J Radiat Biol 2015;91:555-61. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2015.1028599
  18. Gye MC, Park CJ. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2012;39:1-9. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2012.39.1.1
  19. Electromagnetic field (EMF) [Internet]. Seoul (Korea): EMF; c2005 [cited 2019 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.emf.or.kr/.
  20. National Radio Research Agency [Internet]. Naju (Korea): National Radio Research Agency; c2018 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://rra.go.kr/ko/index.do/.
  21. Korea Communications Agency [Internet]. Naju (Korea): Korea Communications Agency; c2014 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://emf.kca.kr/.
  22. Korea Electric Power Corporation [Internet]. Naju (Korea): Korea Electric Power Corporation; c2019 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: http://home.kepco.co.kr/kepco/KO/D/A/KODAPP001.do?menuCd=FN050401/.
  23. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Exposure to static and low frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (0-100 kHz). Munich (Germany): International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 2003.
  24. Hardell L. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review). Int J Oncol 2017;51:405-13. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046
  25. INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:675-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq079
  26. World Health Organization. Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World HealthOrganization; 2014 Oct [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/electromagnetic-fields-and-publichealth-mobile-phones.
  27. Di Ciaula A. Towards 5G communication systems: are there health implications? Int J Hyg Environ Health 2018;221:367-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.011
  28. Russell CL. 5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: public health and environmental implications. Environ Res 2018;165:484-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.016
  29. Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer E, Kheifets L. Guest editors' introduction: is EMF a potential environmental risk for children? Bioelectromagnetics 2005;Suppl 7:S2-4.
  30. Frey AH. Headaches from cellular telephones: are they real and what are the implications? Environ Health Perspect 1998;106:101-3. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.98106101
  31. Hocking B, Westerman R. Neurological effects of radiofrequency radiation. Occup Med (Lond) 2003;53:123-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg030
  32. Wagner P, Roschke J, Mann K, Hiller W, Frank C. Human sleep under the influence of pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: a polysomnographic study using standardized conditions. Bioelectromagnetics 1998;19:199-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:3<199::AID-BEM8>3.0.CO;2-X
  33. Maskey D, Pradhan J, Aryal B, Lee CM, Choi IY, Park KS, et al. Chronic 835-MHz radiofrequency exposure to mice hippocampus alters the distribution of calbindin and GFAP immunoreactivity. Brain Res 2010;1346:237-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.045
  34. Panagopoulos DJ. Chromosome damage in human cells induced by UMTS mobile telephony radiation. Gen Physiol Biophys 2019;38:445-54. https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2019032
  35. Ha M, Im H, Lee M, Kim HJ, Kim BC, Gimm YM, et al. Radio-frequency radiation exposure from AM radio transmitters and childhood leukemia and brain cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:270-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm083
  36. Martens L. Electromagnetic safety of children using wireless phones: a literature review. Bioelectromagnetics 2005;Suppl 7:S133-7.
  37. van Rongen E, Roubos EW, van Aernsbergen LM, Brussaard G, Havenaar J, Koops FB, et al. Mobile phones and children: is precaution warranted? Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:142-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10200
  38. Grigoriev Y. Mobile phones and children: is precaution warranted? Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:322-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20041
  39. Warille AA, Onger ME, Turkmen AP, Deniz OG, Altun G, Yurt KK, et al. Controversies on electromagnetic field exposure and the nervous systems of children. Histol Histopathol 2016;31:461-8.
  40. Wiart J, Hadjem A, Gadi N, Bloch I, Wong MF, Pradier A, et al. Modeling of RF head exposure in children. Bioelectromagnetics 2005;Suppl 7:S19-30.
  41. Kritikos HN, Schwan HP. Hot spots generated in conducting spheres by electromagnetic waves and biological implications. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1972;19:53-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1972.324159
  42. Abramson MJ, Benke GP, Dimitriadis C, Inyang IO, Sim MR, Wolfe RS, et al. Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive function in young adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics 2009;30:678-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20534
  43. Redmayne M. International policy and advisory response regarding children's exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Electromagn Biol Med 2016;35:176-85. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2015.1038832
  44. Thomas S, Heinrich S, von Kries R, Radon K. Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and behavioural problems in Bavarian children and adolescents. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:135-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-009-9408-x
  45. Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M. Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:307-13. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.020784
  46. Calvente I, Perez-Lobato R, Nunez MI, Ramos R, Guxens M, Villalba J, et al. Does exposure to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields cause cognitive and behavioral effects in 10-year-old boys? Bioelectromagnetics 2016;37:25-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21951
  47. Guxens M, Vermeulen R, van Eijsden M, Beekhuizen J, Vrijkotte TGM, van Strien RT, et al. Outdoor and indoor sources of residential radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, personal cell phone and cordless phone use, and cognitive function in 5-6 years old children. Environ Res 2016;150:364-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.021
  48. Cain N, Gradisar M. Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review. Sleep Med 2010;11:735-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2010.02.006
  49. Cabre-Riera A, Torrent M, Donaire-Gonzalez D, Vrijheid M, Cardis E, Guxens M. Telecommunication devices use, screen time and sleep in adolescents. Environ Res 2019;171:341-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.036
  50. Huss A, van Eijsden M, Guxens M, Beekhuizen J, van Strien R, Kromhout H, et al. Environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure at home, mobile and cordless phone use, and sleep problems in 7-year-old children. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139869
  51. Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Cell phone use and behavioural problems in young children. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:524-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2010.115402
  52. Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 2008;19:523-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318175dd47
  53. Sadetzki S, Langer CE, Bruchim R, Kundi M, Merletti F, Vermeulen R, et al. The MOBI-Kids Study Protocol: challenges in assessing childhood and adolescent exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless telecommunication technologies and possible association with brain tumor risk. Front Public Health 2014;2:124.
  54. Final Report Summary - MOBI-KIDS (risk of brain cancer from exposure to radiofrequency fields in childhood and adolescence) [Internet]. CORDIS; 2017 [updated 2017 Jan; cited 2019 Nov 15]. Available from: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/89894/reporting/en.
  55. Choi HD, Kim N. 5G jeonjapawa inche yeonghyang. In: Proceedings of the Korea Electromagnetic Engineering Society 2018;29:26-30.
  56. Science for Environment Policy (2017) The precautionary priniple: decision making under uncertainty. Future Brief 18. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 10]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy.

Cited by

  1. Smartphone Use and Child Neurology vol.69, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.333470
  2. Role of insulin/glucagon ratio and cell redox state in the hyperglycaemia induced by exposure to a 60-Hz magnetic field in rats vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91228-w