Human Ecology Research

  • 제58권4호
  • /
  • Pages.561-583
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2982-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2982-6608(eISSN)
대한가정학회 (The Korean Home Economics Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Habermas의 세 행동체계를 융합한 중학교 가정교과 식생활 수업 평가

Evaluation of Dietary Life Instruction in Middle School Home Economics by Converging Habermas's Three Systems of Action

  • 투고 : 2020.08.27
  • 심사 : 2020.10.29
  • 발행 : 2020.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study developed and implemented a teaching · learning process plan for Home Economics in middle school by converging Habermas's three systems of action. It also examined the effect of the class through the evaluation of students and teachers who participated in the class. This study developed 10 sessions for a teaching and learning process plan by converging three systems of action and reconstructing learning elements related to 'balanced meal plan' and 'food choice' according to the practical action teaching model. After class, we surveyed the degree of help for students, analyzed the learning activity sheets, and analyzed the reflection journals of teachers to evaluate the effects of the class. This class was found to be the most helpful in practicing the healthy dietary life of students, expanding their thoughts, understanding learning contents, and helping them change their lives. As a result of analyzing the learning activity sheet, students gained enlightenment by reflecting and evaluating their action through the class; in addition, changes in interest, awareness, and action appeared. Through the convergence of three systems of action, teachers who practiced the class criticized and realized the act that students were unconsciously accepted. In addition, it confirmed the possibility that students could change their lives, family and society by promoting optimal nutrition and health for a good life that pursues the best good.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Berk, L. E. (2009). Development through the lifespan, (4th eds). (O. K. Lee, Y. S. Park, H. J. Lee, H. R. Kim, Y. K. Jeong, & M. H. Kim, Trans.). Seoul: Sigmapress.(Original work published 2007).
  2. Brown, M. M. (1980). What is Home Economics education?. Minnesota: Minnesota Research and Development Center for Vocational Education.
  3. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home Economics: a definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.
  4. Cheon, J. W., Kim, M., Kim, J., & Park, S. Y. (2011). Introduction to youth studies. Paju: Yangseowon.
  5. Choi, S. A., & Ju, S. (2018). Development teaching-learning plan for food and nutrition unit of home economics based on backward design model. Korean Home Economics Education Association, 30 (3), 175-193. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.knue.ac.kr/10.19031/jkheea.2018.09.30.3.175
  6. Choi, S. E., & Chae, J. H. (2014). Development of smart education-based teaching and learning plans and a smart textbook for healthy diet and meal plans unit in Technology Home Economics. Korean Home Economics Education Association, 26(4), 85-114.
  7. Choi, S. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2011). A development and evaluation of practical problem-based home economics lesson plans applying to multimple intelligence teaching.learning strategy: Focused on the unit 'Nutrition & Meals'of middle school home economics subject matter. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(1), 87-111.
  8. Choi, S. Y., & Chae, J. H. (2020). Development of dietary life curriculum in elementary and secondary schools Home Economics that integrated Habermas's three systems of action. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 32(2), 117-139. http://dx.doi.org.proxy.knue.ac.kr/10.19031/jkheea.2020.06.32.2.117
  9. Fox, W. S. (2007). Process framework for the national standards for family and consumer sciences education. Retrieved from http://www.nasafacs.org/process-frameworks.html
  10. Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Malden, MA: Polity Press. (Original work published 1968).
  11. Han, J. S., Kim, S. S., & Go, M. A. (2015). Influences of dietary education activity on education satisfaction and self-respect. Culinary Science and Hospitality Research, 21(4), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2015.21.4.017
  12. Jacobs, J. E., & Klaczynski, P. A. (2002). The development of judgment and decision making during childhood and adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00188
  13. Jeon, S. K., Kim, H. J., Kim, Y. J., Jung, K. A., Lee, S. S., Yoon, J. H., et al. (2011). Green dietary education of health, environment and care. Paju: Yangseowon..
  14. Jeon, S. K. (2010). Educational meanings and effective practical plans of school dietary life education. Journal of Korean Home Economics education, 22(1), 117-135.
  15. Ko, M. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2012). The effects of green food education program based on the practical problem solutions to the dietary attitudes of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 25(2), 151-172.
  16. Kim, E. S., Cho, H., & Kim, Y. (2015). A study of the relationship of green dietary education, self-esteem and happiness of middle school Home Economics students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 27(3), 63-77.
  17. Kim, J. H. (2010). Studies inquiry on school dietary education in the Home Economics education. Journal Korean Home Economics education, 22(3), 189-203.
  18. Kim, J. H., Jeon, S. K., & Lee, M. J. (2010). A study of integrated dietary education programs based on textbook and curriculum for elementary school students(II). Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(4), 1-18.
  19. Kim, J. H., & Kim, Y. K. (2010). Dietary education support act and middle school dietary education. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 22(4), 1-13.
  20. Kim, W. S. (2015). Habermas reading. Seoul: Sechangmedia.
  21. Laster, J. F. (1982). A practical action teaching model. Journal of Home Economics, 74(3), 41-44.
  22. Lee, E. Y. (2018). Development of an instructional design model for practical problem-based learning in Practical Arts subject matter (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korean National University of Education, Cheongju, Korea.
  23. Lee, S. J. (2011). The change and direction of improvements in dietary education based on middle and high school curriculum. Journal of Korean Practical Art Education, 24(1), 155-174.
  24. Montgomery, B. (2008). Curriculum development: A critical science perspective. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 26(National Teacher Standards 3). 159-174.
  25. Ministry of Education (2015). Practical Arts(Technology.Home Economics/Informatics curriculum). Notice No 2015-74 [Separate 10].
  26. Muller, U., Overton, W. F., & Reese, K. (2001). Development of conditional reasoning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0201_2
  27. National Association of State Administrators of Family and Consumer Sciences (2008). National standards for FCS reasoning for action framework, standards & competencies, and process questions. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nasafacs.org/uploads/1/8/3/9/18396981/process_framework_2019.pdf
  28. National Association of State Administrators of Family and Consumer Sciences (2018). Family and consumer sciences national standards 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.nasafacs.org/national-standardsoverview.html
  29. National Law Information Center. (2020a). Dietary education support act. Retrieved 0211, 2020. from http://www.law.go.kr/.
  30. National Law Information Center. (2020b). Special act on safety management of children's dietary life. Retrieved 0407, 2020. from http://www.law.go.kr/.
  31. Park, S. K. (2018). Food stories with teenagers. Seoul: Chul-Soo and Young-Hee.
  32. Patton, M. Q. (2017). Qualitative research & evaluation method : Fourth Edition. (J. H. Kim, J. H. Na, D. C. Cha, D. H. Jho, Y. K. Cho, J. W. Lim, et al., Trans.). Paju : Kyoyookbook. (Original work published 2015).
  33. Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E, S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
  34. Sang, E. Y., & Kim, J. W. (2016). Developkment of STEAM dietary education program for the improvement of core competencies for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts education, 29(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.20954/jkpae.2016.03.29.1.1
  35. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.
  36. Venet, M., & Markovits, H. (2001). Understanding uncertainty with abstract conditional premises. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 74-99. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0006
  37. Wilson, E. (2005). Consilience: the unity of knowledge. (J. C. Choi, D. I. Jang, Trans.). Seoul: Sciencebooks.(Original work published 1998).
  38. Yoo, T. M., & Lee, S. H. (2010). Practical problem-based Home Economics class. Seoul: BookKorea.