DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Construct Validation of the e-learning Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Korean Middle school Science(e-AEQ-KMS)

이러닝 수업에서의 한국 중학생 과학영역 성취정서 질문지(e-AEQ-KMS) 개발과 타당화

  • Received : 2020.08.26
  • Accepted : 2020.09.25
  • Published : 2020.10.31

Abstract

In a sense that achievement emotion is directly associated with achievement activity of students and its result, drastic changes in educational environment such as expansion of e-learning due to COVID-19 may have a large impact on the achievement emotion of students inevitably. However, studies on the foregoing still remain insufficient, and development of a questionnaire capable of making a quantitative measurement on the achievement emotion of students under the environment of e-learning may become the basis of relevant studies, so this study developed the e-learning Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Korean Middle school Science(e-AEQ-KMS) and verified its validity. e-AEQ-KMS in this study was developed based on the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Korean Middle school Science (AEQ-KMS) and by reflecting characteristics of e-learning science class. With 226 questions in total, the questionnaire is composed to measure 9 kinds of achievement emotion such as enjoyment, hope, pride, relief, anger, anxiety, hopelessness, shame, and boredom under 3 academic situations of class situation, learning situation and testing situation. The result of this study has a great significance in the way that it set out a framework for making a comparative analysis quantitatively on the achievement emotion of Korean middle school students in science for e-learning classes.

성취 정서가 학생들의 성취 활동 및 결과와 직접으로 연관된 정서라는 점에서, 코로나 19로 인한 이러닝 수업의 확대와 같은 급격한 교육환경의 변화는 필연적으로 학생들의 성취 정서에 많은 영향을 줄 수 있다. 그러나 이에 대한 연구는 아직 부족한 실정이며, 이러닝 수업환경에서 학생들의 성취 정서를 정량적으로 측정할 수 있는 질문지의 개발은 관련 연구의 바탕이 될 수 있기에 본 연구에서는 이러닝 수업에서의 한국 중학생 과학영역 성취 정서 질문지(e-AEQ-KMS)를 타당화 과정을 거쳐 개발하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 e-AEQ-KMS는 한국 중학생의 과학영역 성취 정서 질문지(AEQ-KMS)을 바탕으로 이러닝 과학 수업의 특징을 반영하여 개발되었다. 수업상황, 학습상황, 시험상황 등의 3가지 학업 상황에서 즐거움, 희망, 자부심, 안도감, 화, 불안, 지루함, 절망감, 수치심 등의 9가지 성취 정서를 측정할 수 있도록 구성되어 있으며 총 226문항이다. 내적, 외적 타당도를 검증한 결과, 질문지를 구성하는 각 문항은 높은 신뢰도를 보였으며 4가지 구성요인에 대한 확인적 요인분석(CFA)결과, 성취 정서가 정의적, 인지적, 동기적, 생리적이라고 하는 4개의 구성요인으로 이루어졌다고 가정한 모형이 그렇지 않다고 가정한 모형보다 더 타당하다는 결과를 얻었다. 성취 정서 사이의 상관분석을 통하여 각각의 성취 정서가 잘 변별됨을 확인하였고, 3가지 학업 상황 및 9가지 성취 정서의 잠재적 관계에 대해 확인적 요인분석(CFA)결과, 질문지에 반영된 모형이 가장 적합도가 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 통제-가치평가, 학습전략, 성취목표, 과학성적을 준거 변인으로 한 외적 타당도 검증 결과, 모든 준거 변인에 대하여 선행 연구와 동일한 결과를 보였으며 이를 통해 충분한 외적 타당도를 가짐을 확인하였다. 본 연구 결과는 이러닝 수업에서 한국 중학생들의 과학영역 성취 정서를 정량적으로 비교분석할 수 있는 틀을 마련했다는 점에서 큰 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bentler, P. M., & Hu, L. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Coventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  2. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
  3. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp.136-162). Newbury Park: Sage.
  4. Calkins, S. D., & Dollar, J. M. (2014). Caregiving influences on emotion regulation: Educational implications of a biobehavioral perpective. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia(Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 520-538). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  5. Chei, M. J. & Lee, J. (2017). Analysis of Structural Relationship among Instructional Quality, Academic Emotions, Perceived Achievement and Learning Satisfaction in Offline and Online University Lectures. Education Information Media Research, 23(3), 523-548.
  6. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  7. Cho, H. I. (2013). The Relationship between Emotions, Achievement Emotions, and Academic Achievement. The Journal of Elementary Education, 26(4), 229-250.
  8. DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., & Williams-Johnson, M. R. (2014). The influence of culture on emotions: Implications for education, In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 539-557). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  9. Do, S. L. (2008), Issues and Prospects of Research on Affect in Education. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(4), 919-937
  10. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A $2{\times}2$ achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
  11. Elliot, A. J., & Pekrun, R. (2010). Emotion in the hierarchical model of approach-avoidance achievement motivation. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 57-73). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
  12. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002
  13. Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation model. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp.158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  14. Jeon, J. Y. (2014). Development and Construct Validation of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire-Korean Middle school Science (AEQ-KMS). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 745-754. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0745
  15. Kim, E., & Yang, M. (2011). An Exploratory Study on Academic Emotions of Korean students. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(3), 501-521.
  16. Kim, E., & Yang, M. (2013). The Influence of Emotional Regulation on Academic Achievement through Academic Emotions and Learning Strategies. The Korean Journal of School Psycholog, 10(1), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.16983/kjsp.2013.10.1.201
  17. Kim, H. S., & Song, J. H. (2019). Meta-Study on the Validation of the Domestic Achievement Emotion Scale, Korean Educational Psychology Association, 33(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2019.33.1.01
  18. Kim, M. (2009). Emotion in Learning Context: Its Origins and Functions. Asian Journal of Education, 10(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2009.10.1.004
  19. Kim, Y. S. & Cho, H. I. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Achievement Emotions and Academic Achievement. Korean Educational Psychology Association, 29(1), 85-111. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2015.29.1.05
  20. Kwon, O. Y., Lim, H. C., & Kim, S. J. (2008). The Effects of Reaction and Training Performance on Transfer Performance : Focusing on the Moderating Variables of Job Involvement and Need for Achievement. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 11(3), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.36907/krivet.2008.11.3.219
  21. Lee, J. & Ko, E. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships among Academic Emotions, Achievement Goal Orientation, Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(11), 111-128.
  22. Levenson, R. W.(1999). The intrapersonal functions of emotion. Cofnition & Emotion, 13, 481-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379159
  23. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and effect: An asymmetrical bidiredtional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_2
  24. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_5
  25. Ministry of Education (MOE) (2020a). Online school opening for elementary school, middle school, high school, and special school. The press release of Ministry of Education, 2020.3.31.
  26. Ministry of Education (MOE) (2020b). Announcement of class plan for Kindergarten, elementary school, middle school, high school, and special school. The press release of Ministry of Education, 2020.5.4.
  27. Pekrun, R. (2006) The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  28. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583
  29. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotion in student's learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
  30. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
  31. Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds), Emotion in education (pp. 13-36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  32. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ)
  33. You, J., Kim, H., & Park, S. H. (2012). Development and Construct Validation of e-Learning Academic Emotions Scale(e-AES). Open Education Research, 20(3), 19-44.