DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments

  • Kilinc, Hamiyet (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University) ;
  • Sanal, Fatma Ayse (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University) ;
  • Turgut, Sedanur (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University)
  • Received : 2020.02.07
  • Accepted : 2020.07.07
  • Published : 2020.10.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. To assess shear bond strengths (SBS) of resin composites on aged and non-aged prosthetic materials with various surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Cerasmart (CE), Vita Enamic (VE), Vita Mark II (VM), and IPS e.max CAD (EC) blocks were sliced, and rectangular-shaped specimens (14 × 12 × 1.5 mm; N = 352) were obtained. Half of the specimens were aged (5000 thermal cycles) for each material. Non-aged and aged specimens were divided into 4 groups according to the surface treatments (control, air abrasion, etching, and laser irradiation; n = 11) and processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The repair procedure was performed after the surface treatments. SBS values and failure types were determined. Obtained data were statistically analyzed (P≤.05). RESULTS. The material type, surface treatment type, and their interactions were found significant with regard to SBS (P<.001). Aging also had a significant effect on prosthetic material-resin composite bonding (P<.001). SBS values of non-aged specimens ranged from 12.16 to 17.91 MPa, while SBS values of aged specimens ranged from 9.46 to 15.61 MPa. Non-aged VM in combination with acid etching presented the highest score while the control group of aged CE showed the lowest. CONCLUSION. Etching was more effective in achieving durable SBS for VM and EC. Laser irradiation could be considered as an alternative surface treatment method to air abrasion for all tested materials. Aging had significant effect on SBS values generated between tested materials and resin composite.

Keywords

References

  1. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016;32:908-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.013
  2. Kilinc H, Turgut S. Optical behaviors of esthetic CAD-CAM restorations after different surface finishing and polishing procedures and UV aging: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:107-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.019
  3. Fasbinder DJ. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:702-9.
  4. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:382-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12100
  5. El Zhawi H, Kaizer MR, Chughtai A, Moraes RR, Zhang Y. Polymer infiltrated ceramic network structures for resistance to fatigue fracture and wear. Dent Mater 2016;32:1352-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.216
  6. Carrabba M, Vichi A, Louca C, Ferrari M. Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:257-64. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.257
  7. Baldissara P, Wandscher VF, Marchionatti AME, Parisi C, Monaco C, Ciocca L. Translucency of IPS e.max and cubic zirconia monolithic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:269-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.007
  8. Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Syklawer S, McLaren EA, Burgess JO. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing. J Dent 2014;42:1586-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.008
  9. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, Pirani M, Vadini M, Gattone M, Angelis FD. Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials. Oper Dent 2014;39:612-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-108-L
  10. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-159
  11. Ustun O, Buyukhatipoglu IK, Secilmis A. Shear Bond Strength of Repair Systems to New CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J Prosthodont 2018;27:748-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12564
  12. Gungor MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, Unver S, Dogan A. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:259-66. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.259
  13. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:299-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1269-3
  14. Jeong KW, Kim SH. Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM provisional restorations. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:95-104. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.95
  15. Subasi MG, Alp G. Repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:364-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.364
  16. Puppin-Rontani J, Sundfeld D, Costa AR, Sinhoreti M, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching time on bond strength to lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent 2017;42:606-15. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-215-L
  17. Klosa K, Boesch I, Kern M. Long-term bond of glass ceramic and resin cement: evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative etching agent for lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:377-83. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a29381
  18. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-7.
  19. Vohra F, Labban N, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Jarboua M, Zawawi R, Alrahlah A, Naseem M. Influence of Er;Cr:YSGG laser on shear bond strength and color stability of lithium disilicate ceramics: an in vitro study. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2019;37:483-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2018.4582
  20. Tokar E, Polat S, Ozturk C. Repair bond strength of composite to Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiated zirconia and porcelain surfaces. Biomed J 2019;42:193-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.02.001
  21. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ongun S, Karakaya I. The effect of surface treatments on the mechanical and optical behaviors of CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e496-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12749
  22. Coldea A, Swain M, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:419-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002
  23. Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, Monaco A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: Does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013
  24. Cho SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis BA, Platt JA. Effect of Er,Cr: YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent 2013;38:e1-9.
  25. Cinar S, Kirmali O. Repair bond strength of composite resin to zirconia restorations after different thermal cycles. J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:297-304. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.297
  26. Wiegand A, Stucki L, Hoffmann R, Attin T, Stawarczyk B. Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite- based polymers. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2007-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1411-x
  27. Silva PNFD, Martinelli-Lobo CM, Bottino MA, Melo RM, Valandro LF. Bond strength between a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network and a composite for repair: effect of several ceramic surface treatments. Braz Oral Res 2018;32:e28.
  28. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L. Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:319-26.
  29. Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater 2010;26:e11-6.
  30. Naves LZ, Soares CJ, Moraes RR, Goncalves LS, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Surface/interface morphology and bond strength to glass ceramic etched for different periods. Oper Dent 2010;35:420-7. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-152-L
  31. Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Guth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;55:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004
  32. Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016;32:e275-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222
  33. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Oki M, Arksornnukit M, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2015;34:495-502. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-293
  34. Hibst R, Keller U. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 1989;9:338-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900090405
  35. Ozarslan MM, Ustun O, Buyukkaplan US, Barutcigil C, Turker N, Barutcigil K. Assessment the bond strength of ceramic brackets to CAD/CAM nanoceramic composite and interpenetrating network composite after different surface treatments. Biomed Res Int 2018;30:1871598.
  36. Hou Y, Shen R, Chen L, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Li JM, Gao J. Shear bond strength of different CAD/CAM ceramics: acid vs Er:YAG laser etching. Photomed Laser Surg 2018;36:614-20. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2018.4475
  37. Alp G, Subasi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of different resin cements and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of ceramic-glass polymer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:454-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.016
  38. Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Sancakli E, Eren MM, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yildiz E. Shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin for lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:434-43. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.434