Journal of Technology Innovation (기술혁신연구)

Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics (기술경영경제학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technology Intelligence based on the Co-evolution Analysis : Semiconductor Package Process Case

공진화 분석기반 기술 인텔리전스 : 반도체 패키지공정 사례

  • 이병준 (성균관대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 신준석 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과)
  • Received : 2020.10.08
  • Accepted : 2020.11.26
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We suggest a new way of specifying the co-evolution of product and process technologies, and integrating it into one of the well-received technology intelligence tools - a technology radar. Cross impact analysis enables us to identify the core technologies of product-process co-evolution. Combining expert judgment with its results, we can clarify the technological co-evolution trajectory with mainstream as well as emerging core technologies. Reflecting these in the assessment process of a technology radar, we could improve reliance of the technology assessment process and technology portfolio. From the academic perspective, our research provides a point where the co-evolution theory encouners technology intelligence methods. Practically, strategic capability of future-preparedness and strategic management could improve by adopting our method based on our example of co-evolution of semiconductor product and process technologies.

본 연구는 반도체 제품과 설비기술을 대상으로 제품-공정기술 공진화를 교차영향분석(cross impact analysis)을 통해 구체화하고, 공진화 관계를 기술 인텔리전스의 대표적 도구 중 하나인 기술레이더에 통합하는 방법을 제시한다. 교차영향분석을 통해 공정기술 발전과 제품특성 개선이 반복되는 공진화 경로와 축이 되는 세부기술들을 파악했다. 또한 공진화 관계를 기술레이더의 기술가치평가 프로세스에 반영해 가치평가와 연구개발 포트폴리오의 신뢰성을 제고했다. 학술적 측면에서 기술간 공진화를 세부기술 단위에서 구체화했으며, 기술 공진화 이론과 기술 인텔리전스의 접점을 제시했다는 의미가 있다. 실무적 측면에서는 반도체 관통전극-하이브리드 패키지 제품과 주요 후공정 기술간 공진화 및 기술레이더 분석 실례를 제시하고, 이를 통해 기술간 공진화 관계를 기존 기술전략 및 기획도구에 반영해 기업의 미래준비역량과 전략기획의 신뢰성을 제고하는 방법을 구체화했다는 점에서 가치가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권철신, 박준호, 장동훈 (2003), "로드맵의 표현방식과 작성절차에 대한 이론적 고찰", 「한국경영과학회」
  2. 황기하 (2008), "기술로드맵의 활용 현황 및 향후 발전방향", 「한국과학기술기획평가원」
  3. 박현석 (2014), "Function-based Patent Analytics for Technology Intelligence", 「포항공과대학교 대학원」
  4. 이동희 (2018), "크로스 임팩트분석을 활용한 국내 ICT 융합산업의 정보보호정책 분석", 「충북대학교 대학원」
  5. 정용복 (2012), "기술로드맵을 위한 핵심기술선정에 관한 연구", 「성균관대학교 대학원」
  6. 한국정보화진흥원(2009), "성공적 공공 정책 수립을 위한 미래전략 연구 방법론 (FROM) version 1.0"
  7. Allen, P. M., & Sanglier, M. (1978). Dynamic models of urban growth. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1(3), 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(78)90026-X
  8. Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of product innovation management, 26(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00331.x
  9. Basalla G. (1988). The History of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  10. Belloc, F., Nicita, A., & Parcu, P. L. (2013). Liberalizing telecommunications in Europe: path dependency and institutional complementarities. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 132-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.693409
  11. Brenner, M.S., 1996. Technology intelligence and technology scouting. Competitive Intelligence Review 7, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880070306
  12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  13. David, P. A. (1975). Technical choice innovation and economic growth: essays on American and British experience in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
  14. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
  15. David, P. A., & Rothwell, G. S. (1996). Standardization, diversity and learning: Strategies for the coevolution of technology and industrial capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(95)00475-0
  16. Dedehayir, O., & Makinen, S. J. (2011). Determining reverse salient types and evolutionary dynamics of technology systems with performance disparities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(10), 1095-1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.621308
  17. Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of evolutionary economics, 4(3), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01236366
  18. Durand, T.(1992), "Dual technological trees: Assessing the intensity and strategic significanceof technological change", Research Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.361-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90034-2
  19. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, organisations and institutions. London: Pinter.
  20. Ginsberg, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Academy of management review, 10(3), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4278950
  21. Ibsen, C. L., & Skovgaard Poulsen, L. (2007). Path dependence and independent utility regulation: The case of Danish energy and telecommunications regulation. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 55(1), 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03585520701234290
  22. IEEE EPS(Electronics Packaging Society (2019). Heterogeneous integration roadmap: Identifying long-term technology requirements for advancing the eletronics industry. IEEE.
  23. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
  24. Kerr, C. I., Mortara, L., Phaal, R. Y. P. D. R., & Probert, D. R. (2006). A conceptual model for technology intelligence. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2006.010511
  25. Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., Winter & S.G., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24, 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I
  26. Langlois, R. N., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1999). The evolution of competitive advantage in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1947-1996. The Sources of Industrial Leadership, 19-78.
  27. Lee, S., Mortara, L., Kerr, C., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2011). Corporate document mining for technology intelligence: An analysis of needs, utilisation and possibilities. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 7(2), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2011.043197
  28. Leonard Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009
  29. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1987(3), 783-831. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534454
  30. Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994). Co evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150905
  31. Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the evolution of industries. In Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation (pp. 7-27). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  32. Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (2008). Vertical integration and disintegration of computer firms: a history-friendly model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2), 197-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtn001
  33. Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2015). The evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. Business History, 57(5), 664-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2014.975119
  34. Metcalfe, S. (Ed.). (2018). Evolutionary theories of economic and technological change: present status and future prospects (Vol. 44). Routledge.
  35. Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1389-1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00070-7
  36. Nelson, R. R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and corporate change, 3(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.1.47
  37. Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
  38. Rinne, M. (2004). Technology roadmaps: Infrastructure for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2003.10.002
  39. Robinson, D. K., Huang, L., Guo, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2013). Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.004
  40. Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Corporate foresight: towards a maturity model for the future orientation of a firm. Springer Science & Business Media.
  41. Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015). Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.002
  42. Rohrbeck, R., & Kum, M. E. (2018). Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013
  43. Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. CUP Archive
  44. Sahal, D. (1981) Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison-Wesley.
  45. Saviotti, P. P. (2005). On the co-evolution of technologies and institutions. In Towards Environmental Innovation Systems (pp. 9-31). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  46. Schoder, D. (2000). Forecasting the success of telecommunication services in the presence of network effects. Information Economics and Policy, 12(2), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(00)00006-8
  47. Siri Boe-Lillegraven, Stephan Monterde (2015). Exploring the cognitive value of technology foresight: The case of the Cisco Technology Radar, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101 (2015) 62-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.014
  48. Wagner A. 2011. The origins of evolutionary innovations. A theory of transformative change in living systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK