Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of surface materials of self-draining beds on cattle behavior in a temperate climate

  • Liu, Ping (Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Guo, Lulu (Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Fulan (Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, Lin (Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Mao, Huaming (Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University) ;
  • Gu, Zhaobing (Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2019.12.07
  • Accepted : 2020.01.28
  • Published : 2020.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present experiment was to construct self-draining beds to keep surface bedding materials clean and dry for beef cattle comfort in a temperate climate. Methods: In Experiment 1, a self-draining bed was covered with sand at depths of 10 cm (S-10a), 15 cm (S-15), and 20 cm (S-20) respectively. In Experiment 2, self-draining beds of different sizes were covered with 10 cm of sand (S-10b) and wood shavings (WS) at depths of 15 cm and 20 cm (WS-15 and WS-20). Fifteen cattle were engaged to evaluate the comfort of self-draining beds covered with different bedding materials. Results: No cattle lay in the feed alley and cattle spent more time lying on S-10a than S-15 or S-20 in Experiment 1 (p<0.01). No difference in lying time was detected between S-15 and S-20 (p>0.05). In Experiment 2, no cattle selected the feed alley as the lying area. Cattle preferred WS-15 as the lying area and time spent lying on WS-20 was slightly higher than on S-10b (p<0.05). Feces weight was higher in the feed alley than in the different bedding areas in both Experiments 1 and 2 (p<0.01). Conclusion: Sand-bedding depth at 10 cm and WSs at 15 cm above the self-draining bed can provide for the lying comfort of beef cattle. Design of a special feed alley to hold most of the feces to keep bedding materials clean and dry is desirable for organic beef cattle in a loose barn.

Keywords

References

  1. Ruis-Heutinck LFM, Smits MCJ, Smits AC, Heeres JJ. Effects of floor type and floor area on behaviour and carpal joint lesions in beef bulls. In: Blokhuis HJ, Ekkel ED, Wechsle B, editors. Improving health and welfare in animal production. Proceedings of sessions of the EAAP Commission on Animal Management & Health; 2000 Aug 21-24: 2000 The Hague, The Netherlands: EAAP publication; 2000. No. 102. pp. 29-36.
  2. Earley B, McDonnell B, O'Riordan EG. Effect of floor type on the performance, physiological and behavioural responses of finishing beef steers. Acta Vet Scand 2015;57:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0162-7
  3. Tucker CB, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG, Beauchemin KA. Cow comfort in tie-stalls: Increased depth of shavings or straw bedding increases lying time. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:2684-90. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1926
  4. Meng J, Shi FH, Meng QX, et al. Effects of bedding material composition in deep litter systems on bedding characteristics and growth performance of Limousin calves. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:143-50. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0093
  5. Weyenberg S, Ulens T, De Reu K, Zwertvaegher I, Demeyer P, Pluym L. Feasibility of Miscanthus as alternative bedding for dairy cows. Vet Med Czech 2015;60:121-32. https://doi.org/10.17221/8058-VETMED
  6. McFarland DF, Gamroth MJ. Freestall designs with cow comfort in mind. In: Dairy systems for the 21st century: Proceedings of the Third International Dairy Housing Conference; 1994, Feb 2-5: Orlando, FL, USA. American Society of Agricultural Engineers; 1994.
  7. Nilsson C. Floors in animal houses. Technical design with respect to biological needs of animals in reference to the thermal, friction and abrasive characteristics and the softness of the flooring material. Uppsala, Sweden: Institutionen for lantbrukets byggnadsteknik, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 1988. Report 61.
  8. Maccormack JAD, Kelly M, Scott DG, Gracie DI. Cattle comfort and cleanliness on slats. Farm Build Prog 1992;108:6-9.
  9. Nansen P, Roepstorff A. Parasitic helminths of the pig: factors influencing transmission and infection levels. Int J Parasitol 1999;29:877-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00048-X
  10. Haugegaard J. Prevalence of nematodes in Danish industrialized sow farms with loose housed sows in dynamic groups. Vet Parasitol 2010;168:156-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.009
  11. Chan FKS, Griffiths JA, Higgitt D, et al. "Sponge city" in China-a breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy 2018;76:772-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
  12. Cook NB, Bennet TB, Nordlund KV. Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:3876-85. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73073-3
  13. Espejo LA, Endres MI. Herd-level risk factors for lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall Barns. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:306-14. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72631-0
  14. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics for behavioral sciences. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill; 1988.
  15. Houpt KA. Domestic behaviour for veterinarians and animal scientists 3rd ed. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press; 1998.
  16. Rushen J, De Passille AMB, Haley DB, Manninen E, Saloniemi H. Using behavioural indicators and injury scores to assess the effect of stall flooring on cow comfort. In: Livestock Environment VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium, Luoisville, KY, USA; 2001. pp. 716-23.
  17. Flaviana G, Rebecca R, Gianluca F, Licia R, Giulio C. Welfare and meat quality of beef cattle housed on two types of floors with the same space allowance. Ital J Anim Sci 2003;2:243-53. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2003.243
  18. Absmanner E, Rouha-Mulleder C, Scharl T, Leisch F, Troxler J. Effects of different housing systems on the behaviour of beef bulls-an on-farm assessment on Austrian farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;118:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.009
  19. Westerath HS, Meier T, Gygax L, Wechsler B, Mayer C. Effects of the inclination of the lying area in cubicles on the behaviour and dirtiness of fattening bulls. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;97:122-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.023
  20. Fregonesi JA, Veira DM, Keyserlingk MAGV, Weary DM. Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:5468-72. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0494
  21. Drissler M, Gaworski M, Tucker CB, Weary DM. Freestall maintenance: effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:2381-7. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72916-7
  22. Norring M, Manninen E, de Passille AM, Rushen J, Munksgaard L, Saloniemi H. Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2008;91;570-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0452
  23. Ortiz XA, Smith JF, Rojano F, et al. Evaluation of conductive cooling of lactating dairy cows under controlled environmental conditions. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:1759-71. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8583
  24. Lendelova J, Karandusovska I, Zitnak M, Bod'o S, Mihina S. Effect of climatic conditions on differences in thermo-technical properties of organic bedding in laboratory testing. Acta Technol Agric 2017;20:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1515/ata-2017-0001
  25. Munksgaard L, Jensen MB, Pederson LJ, Hansen SW, Matthews L. Quantifying behavioural priorities - effects of time constraints on behaviour of dairy cows, Bos Taurus. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;92:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.005
  26. Serraino A, Bardasi L, Riu R, et al. Visual evaluation of cattle cleanliness and correlation to carcass microbial contamination during slaughtering. Meat Sci 2012;90:502-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.08.001
  27. Hauge SJ, Kielland C, Ringdal G, Skjerve E, Nafstad O. Factors associated with cattle cleanliness on Norwegian dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 2012;95:2485-96. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4786
  28. Phillips C. Cattle behaviour and welfare (Second Edition). In Nutritional behaviour. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 2002. pp. 123-51.
  29. Robichaud MV, de Passille AM, Pellerin D, Rushen J. When and where do dairy cows defecate and urinate? J Dairy Sci 2011;94:4889-96. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4028