DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An investigation of seasonal variations in the microbiota of milk, feces, bedding, and airborne dust

  • Nguyen, Thuong Thi (Department of Animal Science, Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University) ;
  • Wu, Haoming (Department of Animal Science, Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University) ;
  • Nishino, Naoki (Department of Animal Science, Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University)
  • Received : 2019.06.18
  • Accepted : 2019.11.25
  • Published : 2020.11.01

Abstract

Objective: The microbiota of dairy cow milk varies with the season, and this accounts in part for the seasonal variation in mastitis-causing bacteria and milk spoilage. The microbiota of the cowshed may be the most important factor because the teats of a dairy cow contact bedding material when the cow is resting. The objectives of the present study were to determine whether the microbiota of the milk and the cowshed vary between seasons, and to elucidate the relationship between the microbiota. Methods: We used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to investigate the microbiota of milk, feces, bedding, and airborne dust collected at a dairy farm during summer and winter. Results: The seasonal differences in the milk yield and milk composition were marginal. The fecal microbiota was stable across the two seasons. Many bacterial taxa of the bedding and airborne dust microbiota exhibited distinctive seasonal variation. In the milk microbiota, the abundances of Staphylococcaceae, Bacillaceae, Streptococcaceae, Microbacteriaceae, and Micrococcaceae were affected by the seasons; however, only Micrococcaceae had the same seasonal variation pattern as the bedding and airborne dust microbiota. Nevertheless, canonical analysis of principle coordinates revealed a distinctive group comprising the milk, bedding, and airborne dust microbiota. Conclusion: Although the milk microbiota is related to the bedding and airborne dust microbiota, the relationship may not account for the seasonal variation in the milk microbiota. Some major bacterial families stably found in the bedding and airborne dust microbiota, e.g., Staphylococcaceae, Moraxellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Bacteroidaceae, may have greater influences than those that varied between seasons.

Keywords

References

  1. Jayarao BM, Pillai SR, Sawant AA, Wolfgang DR, Hegde NV. Guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell and bacterial counts. J Dairy Sci 2004;87:3561-73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73493-1
  2. Olde Riekerink RGM, Barkema HW, Stryhn H. The effect of season on somatic cell count and the incidence of clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:1704-15. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-567
  3. Kim IS, Hur YK, Kim EJ, et al. Comparative analysis of the microbial communities in raw milk produced in different regions of Korea. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:1643-50. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0689
  4. Vithanage NR, Dissanayake M, Bolge G, Palombo EA, Yeager TR, Datta N. Biodiversity of culturable psychrotrophic microbiota in raw milk attributable to refrigeration conditions, seasonality and their spoilage potential. Int Dairy J 2016;57:80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.02.042
  5. Ribeiro JC, Oliveira AM, Silva FG, Tamanini R, Oliveira ALM, Beloti V. The main spoilage-related psychrotrophic bacteria in refrigerated raw milk. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:75-83. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13069
  6. Nam HM, Lim SK, Kang HM, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative bacteria isolated from bovine mastitis between 2003 and 2008 in Korea. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:2020-6. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1739
  7. Makovec JA, Ruegg PL. Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:3466-72. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73951-4
  8. Metzger SA, Hernandez LL, Skarlupka JH, Walker TM, Suen G, Ruegg PL. A Cohort study of the milk microbiota of healthy and inflamed bovine mammary glands from dryoff through 150 days in milk. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00247
  9. Li N, Wang Y, You C, et al. Variation in raw milk microbiota throughout 12 months and the impact of weather conditions. Sci Rep 2018;8:2371. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20862-8
  10. Wu H, Nguyen QD, Tran TM, Tang MT, Tsuruta T, Nishino N. Rumen fluid, feces, milk, water, feed, airborne dust, and bedding microbiota in dairy farms managed by automatic milking systems. Anim Sci J 2019;90:445-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13175
  11. Yu Z, Morrison M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 2004;36:808-12. https://doi.org/10.2144/04365ST04
  12. Tang MT, Han H, Yu Z, Tsuruta T, Nishino N. Variability, stability, and resilience of fecal microbiota in dairy cows fed whole crop corn silage. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;101: 6355-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8348-8
  13. Salfer IJ, Dechow CD, Harvatine KJ. Annual rhythms of milk and milk fat and protein production in dairy cattle in the United States. J Dairy Sci 2019;102:742-53. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15040
  14. Zhao F, Zhou G, Ye K, Wang S, Xu X, Li C. Microbial changes in vacuum-packed chilled pork during storage. Meat Sci 2015; 100:145-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.10.004
  15. Dutkiewicz J, Pomorski ZJH, Sitkowska J, et al. Airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in animal houses. Grana 1994;33:85-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139409427837

Cited by

  1. Examination of milk microbiota, fecal microbiota, and blood metabolites of Jersey cows in cool and hot seasons vol.91, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13441
  2. Microbiota in Dung and Milk Differ Between Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms vol.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01746
  3. Impacts of Milking and Housing Environment on Milk Microbiota vol.10, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122339