Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Habitat selection in the lesser cuckoo, an avian brood parasite breeding on Jeju Island, Korea

  • Yun, Seongho (Korea Institute of Ornithology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Won (Korea Institute of Ornithology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Yoo, Jeong-Chil (Korea Institute of Ornithology, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2020.03.09
  • Accepted : 2020.06.15
  • Published : 2020.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Determining patterns of habitat use is key to understanding of animal ecology. Approximately 1% of bird species use brood parasitism for their breeding strategy, in which they exploit other species' (hosts) parental care by laying eggs in their nests. Brood parasitism may complicate the habitat requirement of brood parasites because they need habitats that support both their host and their own conditions for breeding. Brood parasitism, through changes in reproductive roles of sex or individual, may further diversify habitat use patterns among individuals. However, patterns of habitat use in avian brood parasites have rarely been characterized. In this study, we categorized the habitat preference of a population of brood parasitic lesser cuckoos (Cuculus poliocephalus) breeding on Jeju Island, Korea. By using compositional analyses together with radio-tracking and land cover data, we determined patterns of habitat use and their sexual and diurnal differences. Results: We found that the lesser cuckoo had a relatively large home range and its overall habitat composition (the second-order selection) was similar to those of the study area; open areas such as the field and grassland habitats accounted for 80% of the home range. Nonetheless, their habitat, comprised of 2.54 different habitats per hectare, could be characterized as a mosaic. We also found sexual differences in habitat composition and selection in the core-use area of home ranges (third-order selection). In particular, the forest habitat was preferentially utilized by females, while underutilized by males. However, there was no diurnal change in the pattern of habitat use. Both sexes preferred field habitats at the second-order selection. At the third-order selection, males preferred field habitats followed by grasslands and females preferred grasslands followed by forest habitats. Conclusions: We suggest that the field and grassland habitats represent the two most important areas for the lesser cuckoo on Jeju Island. Nevertheless, this study shows that habitat preference may differ between sexes, likely due to differences in sex roles, sex-based energy demands, and potential sexual conflict.

Keywords

References

  1. Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology. 1993;74:1313-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940062
  2. Bingham RL, Brennan LA. Comparison of type I error rates for statistical analyses of resource selection. J Wildl Manag. 2004;68:206-12. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0206:COTIER]2.0.CO;2
  3. Bon R, Campan R. Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach. Behav Process. 1996;38:131-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00029-0
  4. Bozek CK, Prange S, Gehrt SD. The influence of anthropogenic resources on multi-scale habitat selection by raccoons. Urban Ecosyst. 2007;10:413-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0033-8
  5. Brown JS. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1988;22:37-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395696
  6. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:41-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00004-6
  7. Cody ML. Habitat selection in birds. Califonia: Academic Press; 1985.
  8. Crawley MJ. The R book. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
  9. Croston R, Hauber ME. The ecology of avian brood parasitism. Nat Educ Knowledge. 2010;1:3.
  10. Darden SK, Croft DP. Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes. Biol Lett. 2008;4:449-51. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0308
  11. Dickson BG, Beier P. Home-range and habitat selection by adult cougars in southern California. J Wildl Manag. 2002;66:1235-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802956
  12. Ersts PJ, Rosenbaum HC. Habitat preference reflects social organization of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on a wintering ground. J Zool. 2003;260:337-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903003807
  13. Freeman S, Jackson WM. Univariate metrics are not adequate to measure avian body size. Auk. 1990;107:69-74.
  14. Godet L, Marquet M, Eybert M-C, Gregoire E, Monnet S, Fournier J. Bluethroats Luscinia svecica namnetum offset landscape constraints by expanding their home range. J Ornithol. 2015;156:591-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1172-y
  15. Hamao S. Japanese Bush Warbler. Bird Res News. 2014;4:3-4.
  16. Hamao S, Hayama M. Breeding ecology of the Japanese Bush Warbler in the Ogasawara Islands. Ornithol Sci. 2015;14:111-5. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.14.111
  17. Hauber ME, Dearborn DC. Parentage without parental care: what to look for in genetic studies of obligate brood-parasitic mating systems. Auk. 2003;120:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0001:PWPCWT]2.0.CO;2
  18. Herve M. RVAideMemoire: testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics. R package version 0.9-73. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire. Accessed 23 Dec 2019.
  19. Ishizawa J, Chiba S. Food analysis of four species of cuckoos in Japan. J YIO. 1966;4:302-26.
  20. Jakimchuk RD, Ferguson SH, Sopuck LG. Differential habitat use and sexual segregation in the Central Arctic caribou herd. Can J Zool. 1987;65:534-41. https://doi.org/10.1139/z87-083
  21. Janke AK, Gates RJ. Home range and habitat selection of northern bobwhite coveys in an agricultural landscape. J Wildl Manag. 2013;77:405-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.461
  22. Jirotkul M. Population density influences male-male competition in guppies. Anim Behav. 1999;58:1169-75. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1248
  23. Johnson DH. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology. 1980;61:65-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937156
  24. Langmore NE, Adcock GJ, Kilner RM. The spatial organization and mating system of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos, Chalcites basalis. Anim Behav. 2007;74:403-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.019
  25. Lee J-W. Searching for hosts of avian brood parasites breeding in Korea. Korean J Ornithol. 2014;21:25-37.
  26. Lee J-W, Kim H-N, Yoo S, Yoo J-C. Common cuckoo females may escape male sexual harassment by color polymorphism. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7515. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44024-6
  27. Martin AR, da Silva VMF. River dolphins and flooded forest: seasonal habitat use and sexual segregation of botos (Inia geoffrensis) in an extreme cetacean environment. J Zool. 2004;263:295-305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095283690400528X
  28. Mohr CO. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am Midl Nat. 1947;37:223-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2421652
  29. Mysterud A. The relationship between ecological segregation and sexual body size dimorphism in large herbivores. Oecologia. 2000;124:40-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050023
  30. Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y. Movements, space use and social organization of radio-tracked common cuckoos during the breeeding season in Japan. Jpn J Ornithol. 1997;46:23-54. https://doi.org/10.3838/jjo.46.23
  31. Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y, Kashiwagi K. Behavior of radio-tracked common cuckoo females during the breeding season in Japan. Ornithol Sci. 2005;4:31-41. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.4.31
  32. Ornat AL, Greenberg R. Sexual segregation by habitat in migratory warblers in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Auk. 1990;107:539-43.
  33. Payne RB. The cuckoos. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  34. Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat. 1991;137:S50-66. https://doi.org/10.1086/285145
  35. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.
  36. Rettie WJ, McLoughlin PD. Overcoming radiotelemetry bias in habitat-selection studies. Can J Zool. 1999;77:1175-84. https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-079
  37. Roelke DL, Sogard SM. Gender-based differences in habitat selection and activity level in the northern pipefish (Syngnathus fuscus). Copeia. 1993;1993:528-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1447155
  38. Rothstein SI, Verner J, Steven E. Radio-tracking confirms a unique diurnal pattern of spatial occurrence in the parasitic brown-headed cowbird. Ecology. 1984;65:77-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939460
  39. Scardamaglia RC, Reboreda JC. Ranging behavior of female and male shiny cowbirds and screaming cowbirds while searching for host nests. Auk. 2014;131:610-8. https://doi.org/10.1642/AUK-14-54.1
  40. Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J Wildl Manag. 1999:739-47.
  41. Sykes PW, Carpenter JW, Holzman S, Geissler PH. Evaluation of three miniature radio transmitter attachment methods for small passerines. Wildl Soc Bull. 1990;18:41-8.
  42. Todorov V, Filzmoser P. An object-oriented framework for robust multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. 2009;32:1-47.
  43. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine; 1972. p. 136-79.
  44. Vogl W, Taborsky M, Taborsky B, Teuschl Y, Honza M. Cuckoo females preferentially use specific habitats when searching for host nests. Anim Behav. 2002;64:843-50. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.1967
  45. Vogl W, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Honza M. Habitat and space use of European cuckoo females during the egg laying period. Behaviour. 2004;141:881-98. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539042265671
  46. Ward S. Energy expenditure of female barn swallows Hirundo rustica during egg formation. Physiol Zool. 1996;69:930-51. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.69.4.30164236
  47. Yoo S, Kim H-N, Lee J-W, Yoo J-C. Seasonal and diurnal patterns of population vocal activity in avian brood parasites. Ibis. 2020: doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12741.
  48. Yun S, Kim H, Moon H-K, Lee J-W, Yoo J-C. Home range overlap and its genetic correlates in an avian brood parasite, the lesser cuckoo Cuculus poliocephalus. J Ethol. 2019;37:271-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-019-00598-2