Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제52권10호
  • /
  • Pages.2262-2273
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The application of machine learning for the prognostics and health management of control element drive system

  • 투고 : 2019.10.11
  • 심사 : 2020.03.25
  • 발행 : 2020.10.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Digital twin technology can provide significant value for the prognostics and health management (PHM) of critical plant components by improving insight into system design and operating conditions. Digital twinning of systems can be utilized for anomaly detection, diagnosis and the estimation of the system's remaining useful life in order to optimize operations and maintenance processes in a nuclear plant. In this regard, a conceptual framework for the application of digital twin technology for the prognosis of Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM), and a data-driven approach to anomaly detection using coil current profile are presented in this study. Health management of plant components can capitalize on the data and signals that are already recorded as part of the monitored parameters of the plant's instrumentation and control systems. This work is focused on the development of machine learning algorithm and workflow for the analysis of the CEDM using the recorded coil current data. The workflow involves features extraction from the coil-current profile and consequently performing both clustering and classification algorithms. This approach provides an opportunity for health monitoring in support of condition-based predictive maintenance optimization and in the development of the CEDM digital twin model for improved plant safety and availability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. NEI, Industry Guideline for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, no. NUMARC 93-01; Rev. 4A, Nuclear Energy Institute, 2011.
  2. W. Gunther, K. Sullivan, Aging Assessment of the Westinghouse PWR Control Rod Drive System, Upton, NY, 1991, p. 11973.
  3. E. Grove, W. Gunther, Aging Assessment of the Combustion Engineering and Babcock & Wilcox Control Rod Drives, Upton, NY, 1993, p. 11973.
  4. H.H. Han, H.P. Hong, J.M. Koo, H.S. Yim, H.B. Kim, Technique on predictive maintenance for magnetic jack type control rod driving system, in: IAEATECDOC-1551: Implementation Strategies and Tools for Condition Based Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA, 2007, pp. 110-120.
  5. J.W. Hines, R.E. Uhrig, D.J. Wrest, Use of autoassociative neural networks for signal validation, J. Intell. Robot. Syst. Theory Appl. 21 (2) (1998) 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007981322574
  6. R. Uhrig, J. Hines, W. Nelson, Integration of artificial intelligence systems for nuclear power plant surveillance and diagnostics, Short Course Notes (1998) 1-9.
  7. D.L. Mattern, L.C. Jaw, T.H. Guo, R. Graham, W. McCoy, Using neural networks for sensor validation, in: 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Jt. Propuls. Conf. Exhib., no. July 1998, 1998.
  8. D.J. Wrest, J.W. Hines, R.E. Uhrig, Instrument surveillance and calibration verification through plant wide monitoring using autoassociative neural networks, in: Proc. 1996 Am. Nucl. Soc. Int. Top. Meet. Nucl. Plant Instrumentation, Control Hum. Mach. Interface Technol., 1996, pp. 6-9.
  9. X. Li, W. Zhang, Q. Ding, Deep learning-based remaining useful life estimation of bearings using multi-scale feature extraction, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 182 (2019) 208-218, no. November 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.011
  10. L. Ren, J. Cui, Y. Sun, X. Cheng, Multi-bearing remaining useful life collaborative prediction: a deep learning approach, J. Manuf. Syst. 43 (2017) 248-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.02.013
  11. R.M. Ayo-Imoru, A.C. Cilliers, A survey of the state of condition-based maintenance (CBM) in the nuclear power industry, Ann. Nucl. Energy 112 (2018) 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.10.010
  12. Y. Zhou, J. Bo, T. Wei, A review of current prognostics and health management system related standards, Chem. Eng. Trans. 33 (2013) 277-282.
  13. K. Moshkbar-Bakhshayesh, M.B. Ghofrani, Transient identification in nuclear power plants: a review, Prog. Nucl. Energy 67 (2013) 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2013.03.017
  14. J. Coble, P. Ramuhalli, L. Bond, J.W. Hines, B. Upadhyaya, A review of prognostics and health management applications in nuclear power plants, Int. J. Prognostics Health Manag. 6 (SP3) (2015) 1-22.
  15. J. Ma, J. Jiang, Applications of fault detection and diagnosis methods in nuclear power plants: a review, Prog. Nucl. Energy 53 (3) (2011) 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2010.12.001
  16. R. Ahmad, S. Kamaruddin, A review of condition-based maintenance, Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 6 (5) (2012) 519-541. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2012.048854
  17. K.L. Tsui, N. Chen, Q. Zhou, Y. Hai, W. Wang, Prognostics and health management: a review on data driven approaches, Math. Probl Eng. 2015 (2015).
  18. J.B. Coble, et al., Prognostics and health management in nuclear power plants: a review of technologies and applications, US Dep. Energy 6 (2012) 1-22, no. July.
  19. E. Ramasso, A. Saxena, Review and analysis of algorithmic approaches developed for prognostics on CMAPSS dataset, in: PHM 2014 - Proc. Annu. Conf. Progn. Heal. Manag. Soc. 2014, 2014, pp. 612-622.
  20. G.W. Vogl, B.A. Weiss, M. Helu, A review of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and best practices for manufacturing, J. Intell. Manuf. 30 (1) (2019) 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1228-8
  21. C.J. Wallace, G.M. West, G.J. Jahn, S.D.J. Mcarthur, D. Towle, G. Buckley, Control rod monitoring of advanced gas-cooled reactors, in: Seventh American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC&HMIT, 2010.
  22. S.D. Caylor, J.B. McConkey, G.W. Morton, H.M. Hashemian, On-line monitoring and diagnostics for rod control systems in nuclear power plants, in: 9th Int. Top. Meet. Nucl. Plant Instrumentation, Control. Human-Machine Interface Technol. NPIC HMIT 2015, vol. 1, 2015, pp. 34-42, no. March.
  23. C.M. Fox, J.R. Gates, S.D. Caylor, D.E. McCarter, G.W. Morton, H.M. Hashemian, Online monitoring of rod control systems in combustion engineering pressurized water reactors, in: 10th Int. Top. Meet. Nucl. Plant Instrumentation, Control. Human-Machine Interface Technol. NPIC HMIT 2017, vol. 1, 2017, pp. 697-706.
  24. S. Committee, I. Reliability, I.E.E.E.S. Committee, I. Reliability, IEEE Standard Framework for Prognostics and Health Management of Electronic Systems, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY, 2017.
  25. International Atomic Energy Agency, Implementation Strategies and Tools for Condition Based Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, Vienna, 2007.

피인용 문헌

  1. A Three-Dimensional Complex Measurement Model-Based Avionic Radio-Frequency Power Source Health Assessment Method vol.2020, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6369729
  2. A Systems Engineering Approach for CEDM Digital Twin to Support Operator Actions vol.16, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14248/jkosse.2020.16.2.016
  3. Data-Driven Machine Learning for Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Nuclear Power Plants: A Review vol.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.663296
  4. A Quality Integrated Fuzzy Inference System for the Reliability Estimating of Fluorochemical Engineering Processes vol.9, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020292