Journal of Creative Information Culture (창의정보문화연구)

The Korean Society for Creative Information Culture (한국창의정보문화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Overseas Educational Informatization Infrastructure Evaluation Indicators

해외 교육정보화 인프라 평가 지표 분석

  • Received : 2020.04.07
  • Accepted : 2020.04.28
  • Published : 2020.04.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine overseas educational informatization infrastructure evaluation indicators and create data for establishing and developing educational informatization policy directions in the future. We analyzed the cases of OECD PISA, UNESCO, ITU, the German Wetelsmann Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education, and China as educational indicators. As a result of the analysis, evaluation items for electrical and telecommunication facilities such as the school's Internet connection network were commonly found in all indicators, and the ratio of learners to PCs (LCR) was also found in 3 out of 4 indicators. Through this study, it is expected that it will be of great help in conducting educational informatization evaluation suitable for the rapidly changing modern society and developing evaluation tools.

본 연구는 해외의 교육정보화 인프라 평가 지표들을 살펴보고, 향후 교육정보화 정책 방향 수립 및 발전을 위한 자료를 만드는데 목적이 있다. 교육정보화 평가 지표를 국제기구와 국가별로 구분하여 각각 OECD PISA의 ICT 친숙도 평가문항, UNESCO 인프라 분석지표, ITU 핵심 지표와 독일 베텔스만 재단의 보고서, 미국 교육부의 학생 접근성 보고서, 중국의 정보화 발전 지수 등을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 학교 인터넷 연결망과 같은 전기 및 통신 시설에 대한 평가 문항(지표)이 공통적으로 모든 지표에서 나타났고, 학습자 대 PC 비율(LCR)도 4개 지표 중 3개의 지표에서 나타났다. 또한, 지원되는 응용프로그램의 종류, ICT 보조 수업의 유형과 같은 다양한 해외 평가 지표가 개발되어 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구의 결과물은 빠르게 급변하는 현대 사회에 적합한 교육정보화 평가를 수행하고 평가도구를 개발 하는데 큰 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Ahn, S. Kim, H. Kim, C. Nam, H. Yang, Y. Kim and K. Cho, A Study on National ICT Literacy Test for Elementary and Middle School Students in 2014, KERIS, 2014.
  2. Ministry of Education, KERIS, White Paper on ICT in Education Korea 2013, PM-2013-3, 2013.
  3. Hyesuk Kim, Anna Sin, Hanseong Kim, Education informatization level and implications of Korea through OECD PISA 2018, RM 2020-7, KERIS, 2020.
  4. Ministry of Education, KERIS, White Paper on ICT in Education Korea 2018, KERIS, 2018
  5. Ministry of Education, OECD International Academic Achievement Comparative Study (PISA 2018), 2019.
  6. OECD. PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do - Student performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. Paris: OECD, 2014.
  7. OECD, PISA 2018 Results: What students know and can do, 2017.
  8. PISA, ICT Familiarity Questionnaire for PISA 2018, Main Survey Version, 2017.
  9. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, Information and communication technology (ICT) in Asia, Information paper no. 22, UNESCO-UIS 2014, 2014.
  10. ITU, Core List of ICT Indicators, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/coreindicators/Core-List-of-Indicators_March2016.pdf, 2016.
  11. US. Department of education, Student Access to Digital Learning Resources Outside of the Classroom, NCES 2017-098, 2017.
  12. National Information society agency, China's Future and Informatization Policy, Issue 7, 2011.
  13. U. Schmid, L. Goertz and J. Behrens, Monitor Digitale Bildung, #3 Die Schulen imdigitalen Zeitalter, Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2017.
  14. Education Policy Network Information Center, 'School Education Informatization Monitor Report' ,http://edpolicy.kedi.re.kr/frt/boardView.do?nTbBoardSeq=&strCurMenuId=55&nTbCategorySeq=&pageIndex=3&pageCondition=10&nTbBoardArticleSeq=821630&searchTopic=&searchObject=&searchCondition_D=36&searchKeyword_SD=&searchKeyword_ED=&searchCondition_W=6&searchK, 2019